Mealey's Fracking

  • September 08, 2023

    Panel Says Trade Group’s Challenge To Fracking Royalty Valuation Rule Fails

    DENVER — A panel of the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has affirmed a lower court and upheld a royalty valuation rule related to hydraulic fracturing production of oil and gas that was implemented by the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) in 2016, ruling that the American Petroleum Institute (API) failed to show that the DOI violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when it enacted the rule.

  • September 08, 2023

    Energy Company Seeks Damages For Wrongfully Transferred Fracking Royalty Interests

    HOUSTON — An energy company has sued in Texas state court, arguing that the oil and gas interests a man claims to have in the Eagle Ford Shale play were wrongfully transferred to him without the company’s knowledge and contending that the man knew that the assets were fraudulently conveyed to him.

  • September 07, 2023

    Agency Cancels Arctic Fracking Leases, Proposes Rules For Future Development

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) announced Sept. 6 that it is canceling oil and gas leases issued by the Trump administration in the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and proposed new regulations for the National Petroleum Reserve-A (NPR-A) to protect 13 million acres of Special Areas in the reserve.  The new regulations withdraw roughly 2.8 million acres of the Beaufort Sea from parcels available for fracking, which the DOI said ensures that the entire U.S. Arctic Ocean is off limits to oil and gas leasing.

  • September 07, 2023

    Study: Radioactive Material Found Downstream Of Fracking Waste Facilities

    NEW YORK — A study scheduled to be published in the upcoming issue of the journal “Ecological Indicators,” made available online on Sept. 6, finds that records related to surface water and stream sediments near wastewater facilities that accept hydraulic fracturing waste are “conflicting and inadequate” in light of a discovery that radium was enriched in sediments that are downstream from waste facilities.

  • September 06, 2023

    Landowner Says Agency Failed To Act Regarding PFAS Pollution From Fracking

    HARRISBURG, Pa. — A landowner who contends that a state agency failed to act in response to contamination of his water supply from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) used in hydraulic fracturing operations has filed a brief with the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board (EHB) arguing that it should deny the agency’s motion to dismiss the case on grounds that the case is within the EHB’s jurisdiction.

  • September 06, 2023

    Abandoned Wells Case Fails, Constitutes Collateral Attack, Fracking Operator Says

    WHEELING, W.Va. — A hydraulic fracturing operator has filed an answer in West Virginia federal court denying all class action allegations brought by landowners in an abandoned wells dispute and asserting affirmative defenses that the plaintiffs’ claims are bared because they constitute “an improper collateral attack” because a state agency’s order establishes that the fracking company is not obligated to plug the wells in question.

  • September 06, 2023

    Fracking Company To Relinquish Lease At Center Of Dispute With Federal Agency

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Sept. 5 entered an order approving the joint motion of a hydraulic fracturing company and the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) for an abeyance pending approval of a settlement agreement in a long-running dispute over a lease the fracking company has agreed to surrender.

  • September 05, 2023

    Landowners Say Lower Court ‘Ignored’ Evidence Related To Fracking Royalty Claims

    PHILADELPHIA — Landowners who claim that hydraulic fracturing companies have underpaid royalties filed a reply brief in the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals arguing that a lower court erred when it “ignored, refused to consider, or dismissed the substantial record evidence” related to their claims.

  • September 05, 2023

    Alaska: Groups Have Not Shown Injury, Lack Standing To Oppose Willow Project

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Alaska filed a brief in federal court in two related cases over an oil and gas development plan in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska known as the Willow Project, arguing that the environmental advocacy groups opposed to the project lack standing to bring their claims because they have not shown that they suffered an injury in fact.

  • September 01, 2023

    Pipeline Company: Permit Appeal Belongs In 3rd Circuit

    PHILADELPHIA — A pipeline company has filed its opening brief in the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals arguing it should reverse a lower court’s decision and remand the case with instructions to issue a preliminary injunction enjoining the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board (EHB) from considering an appeal of a permit to construct a gas pipeline expansion because permit appeals should be heard in federal appellate courts pursuant to the Natural Gas Act (NGA).

  • August 29, 2023

    Study:  Children Living Near Fracking Wells Have Greater Chance Of Getting Cancer

    PITTSBURGH — The University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health published a study that found that children who lived within one mile of a hydraulic fracturing well had “approximately 5 to 7 times the chance of developing lymphoma,” a relatively rare type of cancer, as compared to children who lived in a place with no wells within five miles.

  • August 18, 2023

    Energy Company Says Mineral Rights Owner Failed To Pay For Well Services

    YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio — An energy company has filed an amended complaint against a mineral rights company in Ohio federal court contending that it breached the contract between the parties when it failed to pay for the energy company’s services in operating oil and gas wells.

  • August 16, 2023

    Insurer: Insured Vs. Insured Exclusion Bars D&O Coverage For Crude Oil Entities

    DENVER — An insurer filed an amended complaint in a Colorado federal court seeking a declaration that it owes no directors and officers liability coverage for underlying indemnification demands and counterclaims that directors and officers brought against their former employers and its related entities that operate a crude oil purchasing business, arguing that the business and management indemnity policy’s insured versus insured exclusion barred coverage.

  • August 15, 2023

    Public Interest Law Group Focused On Youth Files Brief Opposing Willow Project

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska — A nonprofit public interest law group filed an amicus curiae brief in Alaska federal court in two separate-but-related cases related to an oil and gas development plan in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska known as the Willow Project, arguing that the additional greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the project will cause “further harm and endangerment to Youth.”

  • August 15, 2023

    Utah, Counties Appeal Dismissal Of Case Against Biden’s National Monuments Decision

    SALT LAKE CITY — Utah and two counties on Aug. 14 filed a notice of appeal stating that they are appealing to the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a decision by a Utah federal judge which dismissed their case against the Biden administration for its decision to reinstate the dimensions of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments.

  • August 15, 2023

    Agency Asserts Authority To Require Fracking Company To Obtain Drilling Permit

    CHEYENNE, Wyo. — The U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and other defendants filed a response brief in Wyoming federal court arguing that the BLM acted within the scope of its authority in deciding that an oil company needs to submit a federal application for a permit to drill (APD) before the agency would allow it to extract mineral from federal land.

  • August 14, 2023

    4th Circuit Dismisses Pipeline Challenge, Bemoaning Power Of ‘Legislative Fiat’

    RICHMOND, Va. — A Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Aug. 11 granted the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) motion to dismiss petitions for review by environmental groups of the approval and development of the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP), ruling that Congress has removed the Circuit Court’s jurisdiction through the passage of Section 324 of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (FRA).  One judge in a concurrence called Section 324 “a blueprint for the construction of a natural gas pipeline by legislative fiat.”

  • August 07, 2023

    Investors Say Company Officers Misrepresented Fracking, Committed Securities Fraud

    HOUSTON — Investors have filed a consolidated stockholder derivative lawsuit in Texas state court arguing that the directors of a hydraulic fracturing company “drastically overstated the value of the resources” in a shale play known as the Alpine High when they made public statements to the market that are now being litigated in a separate-but-related securities fraud class action.  The plaintiffs in the case at hand seek relief for breach of fiduciary duty.

  • August 04, 2023

    Fracking Operators Say Court Properly Rejected Claims Of Underpaid Royalties

    PHILADELPHIA — Two hydraulic fracturing companies filed a joint response brief in the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals arguing that it should affirm a lower court’s ruling that rejected landowners’ claims of underpaid royalties because under the controlling principles of contract construction in Pennsylvania, the fracking leases in question were not breached.

  • August 04, 2023

    Fracking Companies’ Bid To Nix Abandoned Wells Case Is ‘Vexatious,’ Plaintiffs Say

    WHEELING, W.Va. — Landowners have filed a brief in West Virginia federal court arguing that it should deny a hydraulic fracturing operator’s motion to dismiss the third amended complaint in an abandoned wells case on grounds that the motion is “vexatious” and the company is attempting to “escape [its] common law obligations to plug and remediate abandoned gas wells” on his properties.

  • August 04, 2023

    State Agency Denies Claims Related To Drilling Permits In San Joaquin Valley

    FRESNO, Calif. — The California Resources Production Corp. (CRPC) on Aug. 4 filed an answer in California federal court denying all claims brought against it by environmental advocacy groups that allege violations of federal law as a result of the approval of drilling permits on public land in the San Joaquin Valley of California and asserting affirmative defenses that the plaintiffs lack standing and have failed to exhaust administrative remedies.

  • August 04, 2023

    California Supreme Court Says State Law Preempts Monterey’s Local Fracking Ban

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The California Supreme Court on Aug. 3 ruled that state law preempts Monterey County’s anti-hydraulic fracturing ordinance known as Measure Z because it is contrary to, and conflicts with, the California Public Resources Code, which regulates oil and gas activities in the state.

  • August 03, 2023

    Judge Says Energy Company Has No Right To Claim Royalties From Fracking Wells

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — A federal judge in Ohio has granted summary judgment to a hydraulic fracturing operator in a royalty interest dispute, ruling that the energy company that sued the operator has no interest in the oil and gas produced by deep horizontal wells operated by the fracking company.

  • August 03, 2023

    Judge Refuses To Reconsider Mineral Rights Ruling About Certain Tracts Of Land

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — A federal judge in Ohio denied a motion to reconsider her ruling in which she dismissed many claims made by an energy company in a complex mineral rights dispute, concluding that the company identified “no controlling precedent that the Court disregarded, misapplied, or failed to recognize” when it determined that the company did not have claims to specific tracts of land.

  • August 03, 2023

    Fracking Operator Says Arbitration Is ‘Exclusive’ Remedy For Royalty Dispute

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — A hydraulic fracturing operator filed a reply brief in Ohio federal court contending that a mineral rights owner has not met her “very great burden” of establishing that the arbitration provision in her agreement with the company is unconscionable; therefore, arbitration is the “exclusive remedy” to the royalty dispute between the parties.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Fracking archive.