NEW ORLEANS — A federal judge in Louisiana on May 28 stayed a man’s lawsuit against the seller and manufacturer of a home over leaks caused by an improperly installed roof pending arbitration, finding that the causes of action in the lawsuit fall within the scope of an arbitration provision in the purchase agreement.
NEW ORLEANS — The federal judge in Louisiana overseeing litigation stemming from allegedly defective drywall made in China on May 27 entered summary judgment against seven opt-out plaintiffs, finding that their claims were brought outside Louisiana’s prescriptive period or barred by the subsequent purchaser doctrine.
RALEIGH, N.C. — An engineering firm named as a third-party defendant in a property owner and hotel franchisee’s suit over a building designer’s allegedly faulty plans says in a motion for summary judgment filed May 13 in federal court in North Carolina that the designer has not proffered any evidence that the firm violated its standard of care.
AUSTIN, Texas — A couple tells a Texas appeals court in a May 25 answering brief that it should deny a homebuilder’s appeal of a ruling rejecting its request to compel arbitration of a dispute over construction defects, arguing that the builder never contested all grounds that supported the decision and that they provided sufficient evidence to show that the provision was unconscionable based on the cost of arbitration compared to litigation.
CHARLESTON, S.C. — The federal judge in South Carolina overseeing litigation stemming from fiber cement siding that allegedly prematurely cracks and splits entered final approval on May 21 of a $12.5 million settlement to resolve the litigation, finding that the terms of the agreement are fair and reasonable.
RALEIGH, N.C. — A federal judge in North Carolina on May 12 denied a hotel franchisee’s motion for judgment on an architecture firm’s counterclaim for breach of an agreement to pay for design services, finding that emails between the parties from 2008 cannot be considered because they are not integral to or relied on by the firm in its counterclaim.
LOS ANGELES — A California appeals court panel on May 17 sustained a trial court’s ruling finding that the president of a roofing company accused of applying the wrong roof coating was the company’s alter ego and, therefore, should be named as an additional debtor in judgment, finding that sufficient evidence showed that the president made the decision to use the cheaper product and that he regularly used company funds for personal use.
HOUSTON — A Texas appeals panel on May 13 ruled that claims brought by homeowners alleging that a builder’s failure to construct the homes at the proper elevation allowed for flooding during Hurricane Harvey must be arbitrated because arbitration provisions in home purchase agreements were not unconscionable.
Five lawsuits were filed in Florida state court between April 26 and April 28 by homeowners who complain that the installation of the stucco on their homes, which failed to comply with industry standards and the Florida Building Code, has caused damage to the structures.
CHARLESTON, S.C. — A subcontractor says in a motion to compel filed April 21 in South Carolina state court that a proposed class of homeowners claiming that the improper installation of the roofs on their homes has caused water damage has failed to respond to its initial request for interrogatories and requests for production.
SAN DIEGO — A California appeals panel on April 28 sustained a ruling denying a motion by a general contractor seeking prevailing party status in a construction defects suit because a jury found for both parties following a trial as well as a ruling that rejected a homeowner’s request to offset damages awarded for negligence because the trial court lacked jurisdiction.
CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas — A trial court judge’s entry of a no-answer default judgment against a homebuilder accused by a couple of construction defects was reversed by a Texas appeals court panel on April 29 after the panel found that the plaintiffs failed to present evidence that the Texas secretary of State forwarded a copy of the lawsuit and process papers to the builder.
AUSTIN, Texas — A homebuilder seeking reversal of a ruling denying its motion to compel arbitration of a construction defects suit tells a Texas appeals court in an April 20 appellant brief that a lower court erred when sustaining a couple’s argument that the arbitration provision in the home sales agreement was unconscionable because the costs are higher than litigating in state court.
CHICAGO — A federal judge in Illinois on April 16 trimmed a large portion of claims brought by a couple who accused a builder of breaching the terms of the sales agreement and violating the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act (ICFA) when constructing their home, finding that triable issues existed only as to whether NVR Inc. breached the sales agreement by installing allegedly improper floor framing and whether it violated the ICFA by installing wood veneer cabinets rather than cabinets made from solid wood.
OKLAHOMA CITY — The builder of houses for service members stationed at the Tinker Air Force Base (AFB) says in a motion to dismiss filed April 15 in federal court in Oklahoma that the manufacturer of cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) tubing that allegedly prematurely ruptured and caused more than 200 water leaks in the homes in 2017 cannot pursue third-party claims against it for contribution and indemnification because the claims are untimely since construction of the homes was completed in 2010.
NEW ORLEANS — A Louisiana federal judge on April 8 denied one motion to exclude expert testimony and partially granted another in a dispute related to delays and expenses accrued during construction of a hotel.
NEW CASTLE, Del. — A homebuilder was awarded summary judgment by a state court judge in Delaware on March 26 after finding that a couple’s 2019 lawsuit over water intrusion was barred by the three-year statute of limitations because they knew about the problem since 2011.
EAST ST. LOUIS, Ill. — A federal magistrate judge in Illinois on April 9 refused to remand a lawsuit brought by property owners against a contractor they claim failed to properly repair the roof of a historic mill, finding that the plaintiffs’ arguments that the sole member of the company is a resident of Illinois was not convincing.
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — A federal judge in New York on March 31 dismissed with prejudice a contractor’s amended third-party suit asserting claims for indemnification, contribution, negligence and breach of warranty against the plaintiff’s parent company and agent, finding that the allegations were conclusory and that another amendment of the complaint would be futile.
SAN ANTONIO — A federal judge in Texas on March 18 refused to dismiss a lawsuit brought by subclasses of homeowners in Alabama and Texas over damages sustained as a result of allegedly defective cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) piping installed in their homes, finding that the court has jurisdiction over their claims and that their allegations are adequate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).