Mealey's Securities

  • June 05, 2023

    Judge Certifies Class In Securities Fraud Case Tied To Roundup Litigation

    SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge has certified a class in a securities fraud lawsuit against Bayer AG, the parent company of Monsanto Co., related to statements it made about Monsanto’s science-based trial defenses in Roundup litigation, saying Bayer’s arguments in opposition to class certification were “not persuasive.”

  • June 02, 2023

    Software Developer To 9th Circuit: Shareholders Failed To Show False Statements

    SAN FRANCISCO — A software developer that saw a drop of stock prices one day after a merger with a former rival and reduced earnings projections and others filed an appellee brief in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals arguing that a securities fraud complaint by shareholders was properly dismissed with prejudice as the parties suing “failed to plead that any of the challenged statements were false.”

  • June 01, 2023

    U.S. Supreme Court Interprets Securities Act, Remands Direct Listing Case

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 “requires a plaintiff to plead and prove that he purchased shares traceable to the allegedly defective registration statement,” a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 1 in a putative class case over a technology company’s direct listing of shares and allegedly misleading registration statement, vacating a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ judgment and remanding for the court to consider that issue in the first instance.

  • May 31, 2023

    Asbestos Securities Class Certification Briefing Refiled After Stay Lifted

    TRENTON, N.J. — Plaintiffs in a case claiming that Johnson & Johnson violated securities law by withholding knowledge about the presence of asbestos in its talc tell a federal judge that they were refiling briefing involving class certification in the wake of a May 8 order lifting a stay and reopening the case.

  • May 30, 2023

    U.S. Supreme Court Won’t Hear Case Involving SEC’s Denial Of Whistleblower Award

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on May 30 denied review of a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel’s ruling upholding the Securities and Exchange Commission’s denial of a whistleblower award for information the whistleblower provided in an international bribery scheme enforcement action.

  • May 26, 2023

    Hedge Fund Parties Argue Against High Court Review Of Fraud Claims Adjudication

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A hedge fund manager and the fund’s investment adviser filed two briefs in two days in the U.S. Supreme Court, one opposing a petition for a writ of certiorari by the Securities and Exchange Commission challenging a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ decision on the adjudication of securities fraud claims and one supporting the hedge fund parties’ own conditional cross-petition.

  • May 25, 2023

    En Banc Review Of D&O Coverage Dispute Is Warranted, Insured Tells 4th Circuit

    RICHMOND, Va. — An insured filed a petition in the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals seeking en banc review of the panel’s opinion earlier in May that vacated and remanded a lower federal court’s ruling that a “bump-up” exclusion does not unambiguously preclude directors and officers liability insurance coverage for the $90 million settlement of two underlying lawsuits arising from a 2015 merger, challenging the panel’s holding that the lower court “adopted an unduly narrow reading” of the exclusion.

  • May 25, 2023

    Immunomedics CFO Pleads Guilty To Insider Trading About Breast Cancer Drug

    NEWARK, N.J. — The former chief financial officer (CFO) of Immunomedics Inc. has pleaded guilty to one charge of insider trading, admitting that he gave insider information about a new drug development and then made about $213,000 in profit off of a $65,000 purchase of company stock.

  • May 24, 2023

    2nd Circuit Hears Arguments In Appeal Over ‘Control Share’ Provision Adoption

    NEW YORK — The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals heard arguments on May 24 in an appeal by a collection of closed-end Massachusetts business trusts and their trustees after a trial court granted summary judgment to investors and rescinded their adoption of a “control share” provision, finding that it violated the Investment Company Act of 1940 (ICA).

  • May 23, 2023

    Michigan Appeals Court: Reves Test Determines If Promissory Note Is Security

    DETROIT — The “family resemblance test” announced in Reves v. Ernst & Young is the appropriate assessment to use in Michigan to determine whether a promissory note is a security under the Michigan Uniform Securities Act, a Michigan appellate court panel ruled, reversing a trial court’s determination that the Reves test conflicted with Michigan law.

  • May 22, 2023

    ESOP Asks 7th Circuit To Revive Claims In Suit Over Valuations, Securities Laws

    CHICAGO — An employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) is asking the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to reverse dismissal of claims it asserted against company executives, independent trustees and financial advisers under federal securities laws, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and state law.

  • May 22, 2023

    Notice Of Proposed $22M Settlement Approved In Block.one EOS Securities Case

    NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York issued an order providing for notice of a proposed $22 million settlement in a class action accusing a company that promised it would develop a software program enabling the creation of novel EOS blockchain technologies of making “a host of materially false and misleading statements to induce investors to purchase EOS Securities” and failing to register its initial coin offering (ICO).  The order was issued nine months after the judge denied approval of a $27.5 million settlement because the requirement of adequate representation had not been satisfied.

  • May 22, 2023

    Supreme Court Declines To Hear 2nd Appeal Of Disgorgement Award Ruling

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on May 22 let stand a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that affirmed a federal district court’s calculation of a disgorgement award and imposed joint and several liability in a Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action, and the high court also declined to address the jurisdictional character of the appellate mandate rule.

  • May 19, 2023

    2nd Circuit: Shareholders’ COVID-19 Vaccine Misstatements Suit Properly Dismissed

    NEW YORK — AstraZeneca PLC shareholders who accused the company and executives of making material misstatements regarding testing of a COVID-19 vaccine failed to “adequately [plead] falsity or facts fiving rise to a strong inference of scienter,” a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled, affirming dismissal of the complaint.

  • May 18, 2023

    Evidence Supported Jury’s Finding In Securities Suit, U.S. Government Says

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court should deny a former trader’s petition for writ of certiorari because the evidence supports a jury’s finding that the trader conspired to make material misrepresentations when he engaged in a scheme to lie to his clients about bids to inflate his firm’s profits, the U.S. government says in a response brief.

  • May 18, 2023

    Panel Denies Musk’s Claim That SEC Acted In Bad Faith, Nixes Bid To Quash Subpoena

    NEW YORK — A panel of the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has affirmed a lower court ruling and held that there is no evidence to support Elon Musk’s contention that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission used a consent decree “to conduct bad-faith, harassing investigations of his protected speech,” with regard to something he tweeted about possibly taking his company Tesla private.  As a result, the panel denied Musk’s bid to quash a subpoena and terminate a consent order that had been instituted in response to his tweeting behavior.

  • May 16, 2023

    ‘Unwaivable Conflict Of Interest’ Prevents Law Firm From Recovering Under Policy

    NEW YORK — The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 15 affirmed a lower court’s ruling that a law firm has no claim to the remaining proceeds of a directors, officers and entity securities liabilities insurance policy for legal services that it conducted for a pharmaceutical company during an investigation brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission, finding that “an unwaivable conflict of interest prevented” the law firm from recovering under the policy.

  • May 16, 2023

    Wells Fargo Agrees To Settle Investors’ Securities Class Action For $1 Billion

    NEW YORK — Wells Fargo & Co. has agreed to pay $1 billion to settle a securities class action filed by investors who allege that the company violated federal securities laws by making false and misleading statements about its compliance with consent orders to remedy improper banking procedures, according to a May 15 proposed order filed in New York federal court seeking preliminary approval of the settlement.

  • May 16, 2023

    Justices Decline To Decide Whether Courts Have Jurisdiction Over FINRA Bar

    WASHINGTON, D.C.  — The U.S. Supreme Court on May 15 denied review of a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling that a federal district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) suspension and bar of a man were null and void where the man failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before bringing his action.

  • May 16, 2023

    Consent Judgment Entered Against Brazilian Reinsurer In Suit Over 2020 False Claim

    NEW YORK — Days after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an enforcement action against a Brazilian reinsurance company over a false 2020 claim of substantial investment by Berkshire Hathaway Inc., a New York federal judge has entered a consent judgment containing a permanent injunction but no monetary penalty.

  • May 12, 2023

    Investors’ Harm Theory Not In Line With Trump’s Actions, Treasury Says

    ST. LOUIS — A federal district court did not err in rejecting the theory of harm and proposed remedy set forth by plaintiffs in a shareholder action challenging the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (FHFA) oversight of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (Freddie Mac) because both the theory and remedy are not in line with actions taken by former President Donald J. Trump, the U.S. Department of Treasury and Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen argue in an appellee brief filed in the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

  • May 12, 2023

    11th Circuit Won’t Rehear, Publish Opinion In Fraudulent Conversion Case

    ATLANTA — The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has rejected a petition for rehearing by an investor in a long-term incentive plan who unsuccessfully leveled allegations of self-dealing and fraudulent conversion against former plan managers.

  • May 12, 2023

    Securities, RICO Claims Against Flooring Company Consolidated In Georgia

    ROME, Ga. — A federal judge in Georgia has granted a request by Mohawk Industries Inc. and current and former Mohawk executives to join, for pretrial purposes, three cases in which the flooring company stands accused of violating federal securities and state racketeering laws.

  • May 12, 2023

    Settlement Distribution For Array Shareholders Approved After Fee Challenge Fails

    DENVER — A federal magistrate judge in Colorado issued two orders clearing the way for class settlement payments to be made in a case in which shareholders had accused Array Biopharma Inc. and its executives of making false statements about a clinical trial; the orders were filed less than two month after a 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel rejected an objector’s challenge of class counsel fees approved as part of the settlement.

  • May 11, 2023

    9th Circuit Issues Mandate After Rehearing Denied In Revenue Expectations Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued a formal mandate one week after denying a petition for rehearing en banc filed by a cybersecurity services provider and two of its senior executives after a divided panel ruled that while a federal district court erred in concluding that shareholders failed to sufficiently plead the requisite falsity and scienter as to some alleged misstatements made by those petitioners in concealing that the company would not be able to meet its revenue expectations, certain of the statements were forward-looking and protected by a safe harbor provision.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Securities archive.