Mealey's Insurance
-
February 29, 2024
In High Court, Kaiser Insurer Says It Has Standing ‘Twice Over’ In Chapter 11 Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The primary insurer of Chapter 11 asbestos debtors Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc. and Hanson Permanente Cement Inc. is obligated to pay most of the debtors’ debts and is a creditor, giving it standing to object to the debtors’ reorganization plan, the insurer tells the U.S. Supreme Court in a reply brief on the merits.
-
February 28, 2024
Reinsurers Turn To 2nd Circuit In Oil Seizure Row Involving Insurrection Clause
NEW YORK — Reinsurers who were ordered to pay CITGO Petroleum Corp. more than $72.5 million following a jury trial in a suit stemming from the February 2020 seizure of crude oil at a Venezuelan port and involving a marine cargo reinsurance policy have obtained a supersedeas bond and initiated an appeal.
-
February 27, 2024
Delaware High Court: Letter About Paraquat Exposure Does Not Constitute Claim
WILMINGTON, Del. — The Delaware Supreme Court on Feb. 26 affirmed a lower court’s finding that an insurer owes a duty to defend its insured against underlying bodily injury suits arising out of exposure to paraquat, a chemical compound manufactured by the insured for use in herbicides, because a letter from a law firm sent to the insured a year before the policies at issue incepted did not constitute a claim for damages.
-
February 23, 2024
1st Circuit Says Insurer Not Entitled To Reimbursement For Settlement, Defense Costs
BOSTON — A district court erred in finding that an insurer is entitled to reimbursement for defense and settlement costs paid on behalf of its insureds to settle an underlying bodily injury suit stemming from an employee’s contact with raw sewage because the insureds never agreed to reimburse the insurer for any settlement costs and the policy does not include a provision allowing for the reimbursement of costs paid on behalf of the insureds, the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said Feb. 22 in reversing the district court’s rulings related to the insurer’s claim for reimbursement.
-
February 23, 2024
No Contribution Owed By 2 Other Insurers In Environmental Coverage Dispute
SALEM, Ore. — In two separate opinions issued Feb. 22, the Oregon Court of Appeals reversed two trial court rulings entered in favor of a primary insurer seeking contribution costs from other insurers for environmental cleanup costs incurred by insureds after determining that the insureds’ settlement with one insurer bars the primary insurer’s contribution claim and that the failure to prove that underlying policies were exhausted bars the primary insurer’s contribution claim against an excess insurer.
-
February 23, 2024
Questions Of Fact Exist On Cause Of Water Damage, Federal Judge Determines
SCRANTON, Pa. — Summary judgment in favor of a homeowners insurer in a water damage coverage dispute is not warranted because questions of fact exist regarding whether the water damage was caused by a long-term leak or a sudden and accidental burst of water, a Pennsylvania federal judge said in denying the insurer’s motion.
-
February 23, 2024
Building Owner Files Notice Of Appeal To 6th Circuit In Wall Collapse Coverage Suit
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. — A building owner filed a notice of appeal to the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals following a judgment entered by a Tennessee federal judge in favor of the insurer in a dispute between the building owner, contractor and insurer over coverage for the replacement of the building’s wall that fell during renovation work.
-
February 22, 2024
New Jersey Panel Affirms No Coverage Owed To YMCAs For Losses Arising From Pandemic
TRENTON, N.J. — The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division on Feb. 21 affirmed a lower court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of commercial property and casualty insurers in a coverage dispute arising from the coronavirus pandemic, finding that YMCA insureds’ business interruption claims are restricted by their policies’ clear and plain meaning that the court cannot rewrite to cover the “unfortunate losses” they incurred.
-
February 21, 2024
Magistrate Judge Grants Motion To Strike Bad Faith Claim In Water Damage Suit
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal magistrate judge denied a business insurer’s motion to dismiss claims for promissory estoppel and unfair competition but granted the insurer’s motion to strike a bad faith claim in the insured’s complaint, which seeks coverage for water damages at the insured’s business, after determining that the bad faith claim is duplicative of the insured’s claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
-
February 21, 2024
9th Circuit Denies Insurer’s Petition For Rehearing Of Pollution Exclusion Ruling
SAN FRANCISCO — A panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 20 denied an insurer’s petition for panel rehearing, refusing to reconsider the panel majority’s finding that a pollution exclusion does not bar coverage for an underlying toxic exposure suit stemming from the cleanup of wildfire debris.
-
February 20, 2024
Judge Rejects Reinsurer’s Efforts To Quash Service In Settlement Reimbursement Row
OMAHA, Neb. — Ruling that a Brazil-based reinsurer “failed to rebut [an insurer’s] prima facie case of effective service of process,” a Nebraska federal judge denied the reinsurer’s motions to vacate default and quash service in the suit over reimbursement for a settlement reached with Montana regarding alleged asbestos exposure.
-
February 20, 2024
Marine Transportation Company, Insurer Settle Environmental Liability Coverage Suit
TACOMA, Wash. — An insured marine transportation company seeking coverage for environmental liabilities and defense costs incurred as a result of contamination allegedly caused by the insured’s operations settled its breach of contract and bad faith suit with its insurer, according to a notice of settlement filed by the parties in Washington federal court.
-
February 20, 2024
Insured Cannot Present Evidence On Request For Future Policy Benefits
RIVERSIDE, Calif. — An insured is not permitted to present evidence in an environmental contamination coverage suit concerning its request for future insurance policy benefits that the insured seeks as damages for an insurer’s alleged bad faith conduct because the request for future policy benefits was not timely filed, a California federal judge said in granting the insurer’s motion in limine.
-
February 16, 2024
Dispute Over Applicability Of Pollution Exclusion Transferred To D.C. Federal Court
SANTA ANA, Calif. — A suit filed by insurers seeking a declaration that their policies’ pollution exclusion bars coverage for an underlying class action alleging that an insured restaurant’s grain and salad bowls contain harmful levels of fluorine and biocides will be transferred to District of Columbia federal court because the insurance contracts were signed in the District of Columbia and the majority of the witnesses are located in the District of Columbia, a California federal judge said in granting the insured’s motion to transfer the suit.
-
February 16, 2024
New York High Court: Restaurateur Fails To Allege Direct Physical Loss Or Damage
ALBANY, N.Y. — The New York Court of Appeals on Feb. 15 held that the owner and operator of numerous restaurants failed to allege persistent contamination or total uninhabitability of its restaurants to trigger coverage for “direct physical loss or damage,” affirming the First Department New York Supreme Court Appellate Division’s affirmation of a lower court’s dismissal of the insured’s coverage lawsuit arising from an alleged tens of millions of dollars in revenue loss prompted by the coronavirus pandemic.
-
February 15, 2024
Liquidation Order Leads To Permanent Stay For 1 Defendant In Coverage Row
NEWARK, N.J. — All claims against one defendant in a suit in New Jersey federal court over environmental investigation and remediation have been permanently stayed because of a liquidation and injunction order issued by the Delaware Court of Chancery.
-
February 14, 2024
Claims Against LIGA Tossed In Asbestos Coverage Suit Involving Insolvent Insurer
NEW ORLEANS — A Louisiana federal judge granted summary judgment to the Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association (LIGA) and dismissed an asbestos liability suit against it, finding that the claims for asbestos-related lung cancer against LIGA, as the statutory obligor for a now-insolvent insurer, are not covered claims.
-
February 12, 2024
Insureds File Suit, Seek Coverage For Costs Incurred To Remediate Riverbank
SAN FRANCISCO — Insureds filed suit against their umbrella liability insurer in California federal court, alleging that the insurer breached its contract and acted in bad faith by relying on the policy’s pollution exclusion to deny coverage for costs incurred in remediating a riverbank.
-
February 12, 2024
11th Circuit Schedules Oral Arguments In Mold Coverage, Bad Faith Suit
ATLANTA — The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals scheduled oral arguments for April 16 in a mold coverage suit involving an insured’s appeal of a district court’s ruling on breach of contract and bad faith claims and an insurer’s cross-appeal of the district court’s ruling on fraud and conspiracy counterclaims asserted by the insurer.
-
February 09, 2024
Insurer Petitions 9th Circuit For Panel Rehearing Of Pollution Exclusion Ruling
SAN FRANCISCO — A district court’s ruling that a pollution exclusion bars coverage for an underlying toxic exposure suit stemming from the cleanup of wildfire debris should be affirmed because a panel majority of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals failed to consider two applicable California appellate decisions before concluding that the insurer’s pollution exclusion does not apply to toxic dust, an insurer argues in its petition for panel rehearing.
-
February 08, 2024
Dismissal Granted In Asbestos Liability Case Involving Guaranty Association
NEW ORLEANS — A Louisiana federal judge on Feb. 7 granted a motion for voluntary dismissal of a man’s claim that he was exposed to asbestos through contact with a specific worker at a shipyard but keeping other claims regarding exposure against the shipyard, related parties, multiple insurers and the Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association (LIGA).
-
February 07, 2024
4th Circuit Affirms District Court’s Ruling On Continuous Trigger Of Coverage
RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 6 affirmed a district court’s ruling that a continuous trigger of coverage applies in a toxic chemical exposure suit based on an answer to a certified question from the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals regarding the appropriate trigger of coverage.
-
February 07, 2024
Texas Panel: Exclusion Bars Coverage For Baylor College Of Medicine’s COVID-19 Losses
HOUSTON — A Texas appeals court on Feb. 6 affirmed a lower court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of insurers in Baylor College of Medicine’s lawsuit seeking commercial property insurance coverage for its lost business income arising from the coronavirus pandemic, finding that the Pollution and Contamination exclusion unambiguously bars coverage.
-
February 06, 2024
Texas Judge Allows Cross-Claim, Countercross-Claims In Asbestos Dispute To Proceed
FORT WORTH, Texas — A Texas judge denied competing motions to dismiss filed by an insured and one of its excess insurers after determining that the excess insurer and the insured alleged sufficient facts to support a cross-claim and countercross-claims filed in an asbestos coverage suit.
-
February 06, 2024
Coverage Owed For Some Fuel Spill Cleanup Based On Pollution Exclusion Wording
LAS VEGAS — An excess insurer owes coverage for fuel oil that spilled from a tractor because the excess policy’s pollution exclusion did not exclude coverage for cleanup costs stemming from a statutory or regulatory requirement, a Nevada federal judge said in finding that some of an insured’s cleanup costs are covered by the excess policy.