Mealey's Insurance Pleadings

  • July 17, 2023

    Insurers Refute Argument That Wind-Driven Rain Must Be Treated As ‘Separate’ Peril

    SEATTLE — Responding to a condominium owners association insured’s appeal in a water damage repairs coverage suit, insurers argued to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that the Washington Supreme Court’s recent unanimous ruling Hill & Stout, PLLC v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins. Co. precludes the insured’s argument that wind-driven rain must be treated as a “separate” peril under the policy.

  • July 17, 2023

    Homeowners Association Appeals Ruling For Insurer In Suit Arising From Roof Damage

    LOS ANGELES — A condominium homeowners association has appealed a California judge’s grant of summary judgment to its insurer in its breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit arising from storm damage to the roof of a Studio City building that housed 31 luxury condominiums.

  • July 12, 2023

    Insured Appeals Denial Of Leave To Amend Coronavirus Complaint

    BALTIMORE — An insured notified a Maryland federal court that it is appealing the court’s denial of its motion for leave to file a second amended complaint to address the standard for physical loss that was provided by the Maryland Supreme Court in answer to a certified question in a coronavirus coverage dispute.

  • July 11, 2023

    Whistleblower Seeks To Vacate Dismissal In FCA Suit Alleging Medicare Fraud

    NEW YORK — One day after a New York federal magistrate judge issued an order granting a whistleblower physician permission to do so, the whistleblower moved to reopen a case dismissed by stipulation, asserting that he discovered new evidence in his federal and state false claims act violations suit against his former employer, a New York state health system, for alleged fraudulent billing to Medicare and Medicaid.

  • July 10, 2023

    Black Homeowners Say State Farm’s AI Discriminates Against Them

    CHICAGO — State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. trained the artificial intelligence at the heart of its claims processing system with historically biased housing and claims data, making the program much more likely to flag claims by black homeowners and causing delays in repairs and other harms, plaintiffs tell a federal judge in Illinois in opposing dismissal of a class action.

  • July 05, 2023

    Remand Motion In Lawsuit Over Purported Reinsurance Is Withdrawn

    HONOLULU — The plaintiff in a dispute over a purported reinsurance policy has withdrawn its remand motion without prejudice, telling a Hawaii federal court that it made the call after “review of the current evidentiary record,” including the defendant’s opposition to remand and “recently filed exhibits” that “assert and contain facts that were uniquely in Defendant’s control.”

  • July 05, 2023

    Judgment On Pleadings Disputed In Row Over Sexual Abuse Case Settlements

    SEATTLE — Parties in a case over reimbursement for defense and settlement of suits alleging sexual abuse are disputing a motion for judgment on the pleadings, with an interlocal cooperative and a foreign reinsurer arguing issues including whether a pending bid to add allegations renders the motion moot.

  • July 03, 2023

    Texas High Court Passes On Health Insurance Arbitration Dispute

    FORT WORTH, Texas — The Texas Supreme Court declined to weigh in on a dispute over the proper process for evaluating arbitration claims involving health insurers and out-of-network providers.

  • June 30, 2023

    Insurer Says 3rd Circuit Properly Found Faulty Workmanship Is Not Occurrence

    PHILADELPHIA — Rehearing of the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling in favor of an insurer in a dispute over coverage for damages to natural gas wells caused by the insured’s fracking work is not warranted because the panel correctly found that neither faulty workmanship nor failure to perform a contract in a workmanlike manner can be construed as an occurrence under the policy at issue, an insurer says in response to the insured’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.

  • June 30, 2023

    District Court Decision In Mold Coverage Suit Must Be Reversed, Insureds Say

    ATLANTA — A district court’s ruling that no coverage is owed for mold damage discovered in an insured hotel should be reversed because the policy at issue provides coverage for losses caused by a construction defect even if the cost to fix the defect is not covered, the insureds say in an appellant reply brief filed in the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

  • June 30, 2023

    Insurer Says No Coverage Owed For Bodily Injury Suit Caused By Rodent Droppings

    RALEIGH, N.C. — A commercial general liability insurer asserts in a complaint filed in North Carolina federal court that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured for an underlying suit claiming that the insured’s failure to inspect its storage pod for rodent droppings resulted in the underlying plaintiff becoming infected with bacterial meningitis because its policies’ exclusions for communicable disease, fungi and bacteria and mold apply as a bar to coverage.

  • June 27, 2023

    Insurer Seeks Rehearing Of Dismissal Of Its Appeal In Hurricane Irma Dispute

    ATLANTA — An insurer filed a petition for rehearing en banc challenging a majority of the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ dismissal of its appeal in a Hurricane Irma coverage dispute for lack of appellate jurisdiction, challenging the majority’s finding that a lower federal court’s order compelling appraisal and staying a Hurricane Irma coverage dispute pending the appraisal is an interlocutory order that is not immediately appealable under 28 U.S. Code Section 1292(a)(1), 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), or under the Federal Arbitration Act.

  • June 27, 2023

    Insureds Appeal California Court’s Ruling In Insurer’s Favor In COVID-19 Dispute

    LOS ANGELES — Insureds filed a notice appealing a Los Angeles County Superior Court’s judgment on a jury’s special verdict in favor of a commercial property insurer in a breach of contract coverage lawsuit arising from the coronavirus pandemic, challenging the jury’s finding that SARS-CoV-2 did not cause any direct physical loss or damage to the insureds’ hotel on or before June 1, 2020.

  • June 26, 2023

    Contractor Challenges Ruling That Exclusion Bars Coverage For Faulty Installation

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A contractor moved for a Florida federal court to reconsider its Feb. 27 ruling that a commercial general liability insurer is entitled to summary judgment on its declaratory judgment claims in a lawsuit stemming from a subcontractor’s alleged faulty installation of cladding and glazing systems in a construction project, challenging the court’s ruling that the policy’s “course-of-construction” exclusion bars coverage.

  • June 26, 2023

    Freddie Mac Sues Insurers, Seeking D&O Coverage For Costs Incurred By SEC Subpoenas

    WASHINGTON, D.C. —  Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (Freddie Mac), sued its primary and excess directors and officers liability insurers for breach of contract and bad faith in a District of Columbia federal court, seeking coverage for underlying expenses that it incurred on behalf of its directors, officers and employees who were subpoenaed by the Securities Exchange Commission during an investigation and subsequent lawsuit.

  • June 23, 2023

    CGL Insurer Responds To Homeowners’ Petition Seeking Oregon High Court Review

    SALEM, Ore. — A commercial general liability insurer responded to homeowners’ petition asking the Oregon Supreme Court to review an appeals court’s ruling that the insurer has no duty to indemnify either the homeowners or its contractor insured for a coverage dispute over faulty work performed in building a home, challenging the homeowners’ contention that the appeals court “erroneously read” Oak Crest Construction Co. v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. “to require tort liability to find an ‘occurrence’ or ‘accident’” under the policy.

  • June 23, 2023

    Insured Seeks Coverage For $14M In Losses Resulting From ‘COVID-19 Manifestations’

    NEW YORK — The holding company for the U.S. interests of the Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group sued its “all risk” commercial insurers in a New York federal court, arguing that the “Special Perils Provision” in an endorsement of the policies provided coverage for its $14 million in business interruption/interference losses caused by infectious or contagious diseases that were “manifested by any person within a 5-mile radius of” its four hotels in Boston, New York, Miami and Washington, D.C.

  • June 23, 2023

    Court Erred In Compelling Arbitration Of $7M Hurricane Ida Suit, 5th Circuit Told

    NEW ORLEANS — An insured tells the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in its appellant brief that a Louisiana federal court erred by compelling arbitration of a dispute over its claims for $7 million in damages caused by Hurricane Ida and for bad faith against its foreign and domestic insurers, arguing that its domestic insurers cannot circumvent an anti-arbitration clause under Louisiana law.

  • June 22, 2023

    Wisconsin Majority Affirms Coverage Ruling In Dispute Over Pool Construction

    MADISON, Wis. —A majority of the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed an appellate panel’s reversal of a trial court’s ruling that there was no insurance coverage as a matter of law for a pool contractor or the company that supplied the shotcrete for a project that was allegedly riddled with leaks, finding that a trier of fact could determine that the water leakage and consequent cracks in the inground pool, as well as the damage to the surrounding soil, constituted property damage that was caused by an occurrence.

  • June 19, 2023

    Professors Call For Review Of Insurer Standing Ruling In Asbestos Bankruptcy Case

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A request for the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether the primary insurer for asbestos debtors Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc. and Hanson Permanente Cement Inc. has standing to challenge the debtors’ reorganization plan should be granted “to resolve an entrenched circuit split and restore uniformity to bankruptcy proceedings,” eight law professors say in an amicus curiae brief in support of the insurer.

  • June 16, 2023

    Property Insurer Says Insured Refused To Cooperate With Policy Conditions As Required

    PHOENIX — A commercial property insurer contends in a motion for summary judgment filed in Arizona federal court that its insured’s claims for breach of contract and bad faith cannot proceed because the insured breached the policy by failing to cooperate with the insurer’s investigation of the insured’s vandalism and theft claim.

  • June 15, 2023

    Trial Set In Suit Seeking Nonpublic Info On Holding Company’s Captive Reinsurer

    WILMINGTON, Del. — A one-day trial in the Delaware Court of Chancery has been set for June 26 in a suit seeking nonpublic information regarding a captive reinsurer, with the parties filing a joint pretrial stipulation and the plaintiff filing a pretrial brief.

  • June 15, 2023

    Third-Party Complaint Is Filed In Suit Involving Reinsurance Commutation

    JACKSON, Miss. — Defendants in a lawsuit involving what the plaintiff alleges was “a corporate insurance and risk management program promoted, created, and put in place by Defendants for Domino’s Pizza franchisees” have filed a third-party complaint against Domino’s Pizza LLC and related entities in a Mississippi federal court.

  • June 14, 2023

    Parties Debate Exclusions In D.C. Circuit Appeal Over Condensation Damage Coverage

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A real estate developer and contractor seeking reversal of summary judgment granted to their builders risk insurers in a dispute over coverage for remediation of condensation damage tell the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that the insurers’ arguments in opposition were rejected in Blaine Construction Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America and that the evidence of causation provided should have been dispositive under the language of the policies.

  • June 14, 2023

    Vizio Tells 9th Circuit Its 4th Amended Complaint Is ‘More Than Sufficient’

    SAN FRANCISCO — Responding to an insurer’s contention that its appeal “merely regurgitates the same failed arguments,” Vizio Inc. tells the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that the allegations in its fourth amended complaint are “more than sufficient” to permit it to proceed past the pleading stage in its lawsuit seeking coverage for an underlying $17 million settlement and defense costs arising from class claims alleging unauthorized collections of consumers’ television viewing data.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Insurance Pleadings archive.