Mealey's Fracking

  • April 06, 2023

    Judge Says Factual Dispute Over Trade Secrets Exists In Fracking Chemicals Case

    DENVER — A federal judge in Colorado has partially dismissed a trade secrets lawsuit involving a company that sells chemicals to hydraulic fracturing operators, ruling that there is a factual dispute over whether the information in question is a protected trade secret.

  • April 06, 2023

    Alaska Fracking Proponents Insist Biden Administration’s Moratorium Was Unlawful

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Hydraulic fracturing advocates have filed a brief in Alaska federal court contending that the Biden administration has failed to rebut their claims that the moratorium on fracking enacted through President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s executive order was unlawful.

  • April 05, 2023

    Fracking Trade Groups’ Case Against Federal Agencies Stayed Pending Development Plan

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The clerk of the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has entered an order holding in abeyance a lawsuit brought by the American Petroleum Institute (API) against the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) related to what the API calls “an unlawful delay” in the DOI’s program for oil and gas leasing in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).

  • April 04, 2023

    Judge Stays Briefing In National Monuments Case Against Biden Administration

    SALT LAKE CITY — A federal judge in Utah on April 4 granted a motion by the Biden administration staying the briefing in a lawsuit brought by the state of Utah and two municipalities over the dimensions of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments, ruling that threshold legal issues must be resolved before addressing the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

  • March 30, 2023

    Judge Refuses To Certify Class In Fracking Case, Says Individual Inquiries Needed

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — A federal judge in Ohio denied class certification for landowners in a mineral rights dispute with a hydraulic fracturing company, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to meet the class action criteria regarding the proportionality of the potential damages to the actual harm and that individual inquiries must be conducted for each member of the proposed class.

  • March 29, 2023

    Judge Enjoins Federal Agency From Halting Fracking Lease Sales In North Dakota

    BISMARCK, N.D. — A federal judge in North Dakota has approved the state of North Dakota’s request for an order enjoining and restraining the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) implementation of its moratorium on hydraulic fracturing lease sales in the state, but the judge denied the state’s request for an order compelling the DOI to hold the previously canceled quarterly lease sales for “available” lands.

  • March 28, 2023

    Fracking Operator To Pay $6.2M To Remedy Noncompliance At Its Wells In New Mexico

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on March 27 announced that it has reached an agreement with a hydraulic fracturing operator under which it will pay a combined $6.2 million in penalties and environmental improvement costs to ensure that it is in compliance with clean air regulations on all of its 239 well pads in New Mexico.

  • March 28, 2023

    Oil Company:  Municipality Violated Civil Rights, Due Process With Zoning Changes

    LOS ANGELES — An oil and gas exploration company sued a California municipality in California federal court, contending that it is liable for violating the company’s civil rights and arguing that it has violated the takings clause of the U.S. Constitution by changing zoning laws that make drilling difficult on lands for which the company already has the right to drill.

  • March 22, 2023

    Following Adverse Inter Partes Review, U.S. Well Gives Notice Of Appeal

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — In a March 21 filing with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, the owner of a patented method and system for fully electronic monitoring and control of hydraulic fracturing said it will appeal a January determination of obviousness.

  • March 21, 2023

    Native American Group Seeks Intervention In Case Opposing Willow Project Approval

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska — A Native American organization on March 20 moved to intervene in a lawsuit brought by other Native Americans who oppose the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) decision to allow a hydraulic fracturing development project in the National Petroleum Reserve on Alaska’s North Slope known as the Willow Project.  The organization seeking to intervene says it has the right to do so because it represents the community of Nuiqsut, Alaska, the village closest to the project.

  • March 13, 2023

    Landowners In Fracking Royalty Dispute Seek 3rd Circuit Review Of Dismissal

    SCRANTON, Pa. — Pennsylvania landowners who had their royalty dispute dismissed when a federal judge found that they failed to produce evidence that created a genuine dispute of material fact regarding the negotiation of certain fees with a hydraulic fracturing operator have filed a notice of appeal to the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

  • March 13, 2023

    Split Texas High Court Favors Landowners In Fracking Royalty Contract Dispute

    AUSTIN, Texas — A divided Texas Supreme Court on March 10 affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of landowners in a hydraulic fracturing royalty dispute, holding that the “broad lease language” of the agreement between the parties “unambiguously contemplates” a royalty base that may exceed gross proceeds.

  • March 13, 2023

    Groups Say Federal Fracking Lease Approval Was ‘Arbitrary And Capricious’

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Environmental groups filed a brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia arguing that they are entitled to summary judgment in their dispute with the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) over the sale of oil and gas lease parcels for hydraulic fracturing because the DOI’s analysis that found that there was no significant impact from fracking was “arbitrary and capricious.”

  • March 10, 2023

    Panel: Fracking Operator Validly Pooled Portions Of Lease, So No Violation

    CINCINNATI — A panel of the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 9 issued a mandate enforcing its unpublished opinion that a hydraulic fracturing operator validly pooled portions of the leasehold into a drilling unit and conducted operations that extended the lease in question such that it did not violate the lease by continuing operations, contrary to the claims of the leaseholders.

  • March 09, 2023

    Native American Tribes Say Case Challenging National Monuments Order Fails

    SALT LAKE CITY — A group of Native American tribes moved to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the state of Utah and two municipalities over the dimensions of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments, contending that President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s proclamation reestablishing them is consistent with the Antiquities Act and, therefore, the lawsuit challenging the president’s decision fails.

  • March 09, 2023

    Judge Allows Royalty Claims In Fracking Case But Dismisses 2 Defendants

    CLARKSBURG, W.Va. — A federal judge in West Virginia partially dismissed a hydraulic fracturing contract dispute as it relates to two fracking operators but denied dismissal with respect to claims against the remaining defendant for improper deductions of royalties.

  • March 09, 2023

    Judge Denies Reconsideration Of Order Allowing Cross-Unit Drilling In Pennsylvania

    HARRISBURG, Pa. — A federal judge in Pennsylvania has denied a motion by leaseholders seeking reconsideration of an order that granted summary judgment in a dispute over cross-unit drilling of hydraulic fracturing wells, ruling that he did not “clearly err” in his interpretation of the lease in question.

  • March 09, 2023

    Fracking Company Says Colorado Agency’s Remediation Order Deprives It Of Revenue

    DENVER — A drilling and well service company has sued the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) in state court challenging the legality of the COGCC’s order of noncompliance with regard to remediating hazards, which the company says effectively requires it to shut down wells and deprives it of operating revenue by suspending its authority to transport and sell oil and gas.

  • March 09, 2023

    Group:  Agency’s Arguments Opposing Offshore Fracking Case ‘Have No Legal Basis’

    LOS ANGELES — An environmental advocacy group filed a brief in California federal court arguing that its lawsuit pertaining to offshore oil and gas activities along the Pacific Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) is valid and contending that the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) arguments that the case should be dismissed “have no legal basis and conflict with considerable precedent.”

  • March 08, 2023

    DOI: Groups Fail To Show Unlawful Delay In Plan To Develop Offshore Drilling

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) has filed a brief in the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals arguing that oil and gas industry trade groups have not established standing and have not shown that there has been an unlawful delay in the DOI’s program for oil and gas leasing in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).

  • March 08, 2023

    Class Says Fracking Company Breached Its Contract By Failing To Pay Royalties

    LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — A putative class of hydraulic fracturing royalty owners has sued an oil and gas company in Arkansas federal court contending that it has breached its obligations by failing to pay royalties based upon the gross proceeds actually received on the sale of natural gas to third-party purchasers at the pipeline interconnects, without deductions.

  • March 08, 2023

    Amici:  High Court Review Of Coastal Zone Fracking Case Needed For Economic Reasons

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Texas and other states have filed an amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that it should grant review of a hydraulic fracturing trade group’s petition regarding the interpretation of the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) because the lower court ruling jeopardizes the “economic driver” of oil and gas production in their respective states and conflicts with the decisions of other circuit courts.

  • March 08, 2023

    Native American Groups Oppose Fracking Advocates In Case About Drilling Moratorium

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska — A Native American tribal government and other tribal parties filed a brief in Alaska federal court contending that it should deny a motion for summary judgment sought by hydraulic fracturing advocates who say the Biden administration unlawfully imposed a moratorium on fracking.  The tribal government says the fracking proponents’ arguments are “based on fundamental misapprehensions” regarding both executive actions and the analysis conducted by federal agencies.

  • February 27, 2023

    Judge Denies 2nd Motion To Nix Plaintiff Attorney In Abandoned Wells Case

    WHEELING, W.Va. — A federal judge in West Virginia denied a hydraulic fracturing company’s second attempt to disqualify the counsel for landowners in a dispute over abandoned wells, ruling that there is no ethical violation on the part of the fracking operator’s former employee Bryan “Wayne” Bowman II or the plaintiffs’ counsel because during his employment he did not serve in any official capacity in its in-house legal department.

  • February 27, 2023

    Canada Not Liable For Revocation Of River Fracking Permit, Tribunal Says

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) has published a split tribunal’s award rejecting a U.S. hydraulic fracturing company’s claim for more than $103.6 million against the government of Canada for allegedly breaching the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) by revoking its permit to explore and frack oil deposits under the St. Lawrence River.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Fracking archive.