Mealey's Disability Insurance

  • March 16, 2022

    Breach Of Contract, Bad Faith Claims Properly Dismissed Against Disability Insurer

    NEW ORLEANS — A district court did not err in dismissing a disability claimant’s breach of contract and bad faith claims against a disability insurer because the claimant failed to offer sufficient facts in support of the breach of contract and bad faith claims, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said March 15.

  • March 11, 2022

    Medical Evidence Supports Disability Insurer’s Termination Of LTD Benefits

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California federal judge on Feb. 18 denied a disability claimant’s motion for judgment and granted a disability insurer’s motion for judgment after determining that the medical evidence supports the insurer’s termination of benefits based on the conclusion that the claimant was no longer disabled from performing the duties of his own occupation.

  • March 11, 2022

    Disability Plan Did Not State Continued Social Security Benefits Were Necessary

    CHICAGO — A disability plan’s termination of long-term disability (LTD) benefits was arbitrary and capricious because the plan did not state that continued Social Security Administration (SSA) disability benefits were necessary in order to continue to receive LTD benefits, an Illinois federal judge said Feb. 28 in granting the claimant’s motion for summary judgment.

  • March 11, 2022

    Disability Benefits Owed Under Plan’s Own-Occupation Standard, Judge Says

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A disability claimant is entitled to long-term disability (LTD) benefits for the full 24-month period permitted under the plan’s own-occupation standard because the claimant met his burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he was disabled from performing the duties of his own occupation, a California federal judge said Feb. 15.

  • March 10, 2022

    Denial Of LTD Benefits Was Arbitrary, Capricious, Federal Judge Determines

    CHATANOOGA, Tenn. — A Tennessee federal judge on March 9 granted a disability claimant’s motion for judgment on the administrative record and remanded the claim to the plan administrator after determining that the disability insurer’s denial of long-term disability (LTD) benefits was arbitrary and capricious because the insurer disregarded the opinion of the claimant’s treating doctor who was the only physician to physically examine the claimant.

  • March 10, 2022

    Administrative Record In Disability Suit To Be Filed Under Seal, Judge Says

    SEATTLE — A Washington federal judge on March 9 granted a joint motion to seal the administrative record in a disability benefits suit after determining that protecting the disability claimant’s privacy interests outweighs any public interest in accessing the records.

  • March 09, 2022

    Judge Says Jury Instruction On Disability Insurers’ Burden Of Proof Is Allowed

    FORT MYERS, Fla. — A Florida federal judge on Feb. 23 granted a disability claimant’s motion to include a jury instruction stating that defendant disability insurers carry the burden of proving the claimant’s disability under Florida law because the insurers terminated the claimant’s benefits.

  • March 09, 2022

    Medical Evidence Supports Finding That Disability Claimant Was Totally Disabled

    CHICAGO — An Illinois federal judge on Feb. 16 granted a disability claimant’s motion for judgment on the administrative record after determining that the medical evidence and the claimant’s deteriorating health condition support a finding that the claimant was totally disabled from performing the duties of her occupation.

  • March 09, 2022

    Judge Rejects Disability Insurer’s Objections To Inclusion Of Therapist’s Letter

    CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. — Noting that a disability benefits suit has been going on for far too long, a New York federal judge on Feb. 17 denied a disability insurer’s objections to the inclusion in the record of a letter from a physical therapist who completed the claimant’s functional capacity evaluation and encouraged the parties to consider other approaches to bring the suit to finality.

  • March 07, 2022

    Disability Claimant Met Burden Of Showing She Is Disabled From Own Occupation

    NEW YORK — A disability claimant met her burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that she was disabled from performing the duties of her own occupation under the terms of a disability plan, a New York federal judge said March 3 after determining that subjective and objective medical evidence supports the claimant’s disability.

  • March 07, 2022

    Administrative Record In Disability Benefits Suit To Be Sealed, Judge Says

    CINCINNATI — An Ohio federal judge on March 4 granted a disability insurer’s unopposed motion to seal the administrative record after determining that the insurer met its burden of showing that protection of the claimant’s private health information outweighs any public interest in the disclosure of the information.

  • March 04, 2022

    Disability Claimant Failed To Show That Termination Of Benefits Was Incorrect

    CINCINNATI — A district court did not err in entering judgment in favor of a disability insurer because the disability claimant failed to show that the lower court erroneously found that the insurer’s termination of benefits was incorrect based on the evidence, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said Feb. 22.

  • March 04, 2022

    Change In Disability Benefits Was Not Arbitrary, Capricious, 6th Circuit Says

    CINCINNATI — A district court did not err in finding that a disability plan and its administrator did not act arbitrarily and capriciously in determining that a plan participant was no longer totally disabled and, instead, only partially disabled because the medical evidence supports the plan’s decision, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said Feb. 24.

  • February 22, 2022

    District Court Erred In Awarding Disability Benefits, Panel Says In Remanding

    NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 18 vacated and remanded a district court’s award of almost $195,000 in disability benefits to a disability claimant after determining that the lower court should have remanded the claim to the plan administrator to determine the amount of benefits owed to the claimant.

  • February 22, 2022

    High Court Denies Review Of Disability Claimant’s Petition On Choice Of Law

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 22 denied a disability claimant’s petition for writ of certiorari seeking a “uniform rule enforcing an ERISA plan’s choice of law” and a ruling that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act does not preempt state law prescribing de novo judicial review for challenged benefit determinations.

  • February 15, 2022

    Question Of Fact Exists As To Disability Claimant’s Medical Specialty, Judge Says

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on Feb. 10 denied a disability claimant’s motion for summary judgment in a breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit after determining that a question of fact exists as to whether the claimant’s occupation was limited to that of a pediatric anesthesiologist.

  • February 10, 2022

    Disability Claimant’s Suit Not Filed Within 3 Years As Required, Judge Determines

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on Jan. 12 dismissed a breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit filed against a disability insurer after determining that the claimant’s suit seeking disability benefits for pain following a voluntary bone marrow donation is untimely as it was not filed within three years as required by the policy.

  • February 10, 2022

    Question Of Fact Exists As To Whether Disability Insurer Waived Payment Deadline

    PHOENIX — An Arizona federal judge on Jan. 31 determined that questions of fact exists as to whether a disability income insurer waived its right to cancel an insured’s policy based on a late payment because a fact finder could find that the insurer’s prior acceptance of premium payments made after the 31-day grace period is evidence of the insurer’s waiver of the premium payment deadline.

  • February 10, 2022

    Disability Insurers Did Not Act In Bad Faith In Denying LTD Claim

    PHILADELPHIA — A Pennsylvania federal judge on Feb. 9 dismissed a bad faith claim alleged against two disability insurers after determining that the insurers had a reasonable basis to deny the insured’s claim for additional long-term disability (LTD) benefits.

  • February 09, 2022

    Good Cause Exists To Extend Discovery Deadline In Disability Benefits Suit

    ASHEVILLE, N.C. — A North Carolina federal judge on Feb. 8 granted a disability claimant’s request to extend a discovery deadline after determining that good cause exists for extending the deadline and allowing the disability insurer to respond to the claimant’s discovery requests.

  • February 09, 2022

    Federal Judge Awards Prejudgment Interest, Attorney Fees In Disability Suit

    CINCINNATI — An Ohio federal judge on Jan. 31 determined that a disability claimant is entitled to a 3.5% prejudgment interest rate on the claimant’s long-term disability (LTD) benefits incurred after Jan. 24, 2020, and determined that the claimant is entitled to more than $130,000 in additional attorney fees following a 33% reduction in the amount requested by the claimant.

  • February 08, 2022

    Judge Denies Disability Claimant’s Motion To Supplement Record

    DENVER — A Colorado federal judge on Feb. 7 denied a disability claimant’s motion to supplement the administrative record with documents received after the insurer denied the claimant’s appeal because the claimant failed to meet her burden of proving that supplementing the administrative record is warranted.

  • January 31, 2022

    Editor’s Note

    The journalists and staff of Mealey’s Litigation Reports are saddened by the passing of co-founder Michael P. Mealey. He was a respected member of the newsletter community, being named publisher of the year by the National Newsletter Association and president of the National Newsletter Association. Mike and Judy Mealey started Mealey Publications Inc. in 1984. As president, Mike grew the Mealey’s Litigation Report portfolio, introduced email news bulletins and electronic CD formats and launched a continuing legal education conference business. Mealey’s was sold to LexisNexis in 2000. We hope to carry on his journalistic curiosity and integrity in the titles we continue to publish today under his name.

  • January 28, 2022

    District Court Correctly Denied Disability Claimant’s Motion To Amend Complaint

    NEW YORK — The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 27 affirmed a district court’s denial of a disability claimant’s motion to amend a complaint to assert a cause of action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, agreeing with the lower court’s conclusion that amendment would be futile as the claimant failed to exhaust all administrative remedies prior to filing suit.

  • January 27, 2022

    State Law Claims Are Not Preempted By ERISA; Policy Not Part Of ERISA Plan

    TACOMA, Wash. — A disability claimant’s state law claims for breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith, negligent claims handling and violations of Washington law can proceed because the individual disability income policy at issue is not a plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a Washington federal judge said Jan. 19 in rejecting the insurer’s argument that the state law claims are preempted by ERISA.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Disability Insurance archive.