Mealey's California Section 17200

  • March 06, 2024

    Judge Strikes Dismissal Of Putative Class Suit Against Alleged Gambling App

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge struck a plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal of his putative class suit against a “sweepstakes” app for allegedly enticing the plaintiff into illegal sports gambling in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and directed the plaintiff to file further briefing establishing whether the plaintiff received any settlement or consideration for dismissal and if dismissal will prejudice the interests of potential class members.

  • March 06, 2024

    9th Circuit: Google Didn’t Deceive Android Users By Gathering App, OS Data

    SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on March 5 affirmed the dismissal of two smartphone users’ fraud, unfair competition and breach of contract claims against Google LLC for collecting data on third-party app usage via its Android operating system (OS), finding that Google adequately disclosed its collection of consumer data across both Google apps and third-party apps using its OS.

  • March 05, 2024

    Georgia Judge Grants Final OK In Chick-Fil-A Hidden Delivery Fee Settlement

    ATLANTA — A settlement agreement that includes a cash settlement fund of up to $1.45 million and up to $2.95 million in gift cards reached in a consolidated class complaint accusing a fast food chain of offering free or low-cost delivery while hiding charges within increased food prices was granted final approval by a Georgia judge.

  • March 05, 2024

    Consumers Tell 9th Circuit UCL Claims Against Chipmaker Were Wrongly Dismissed

    SAN FRANCISCO — Consumers filed an appellant brief in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals arguing that their putative class claims against a modem chipmaker for violation of antitrust laws and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) should not have been dismissed on summary judgment and alternatively urging the court to certify a question to the California Supreme Court on their state law claims.

  • March 04, 2024

    Consumer Accuses Apple Of ‘Rigging’ Devices To Monopolize Cloud Storage

    SAN FRANCISCO — A consumer on March 1 filed a putative class action complaint against Apple Inc. in California federal court, accusing it of monopolizing access to its iCloud data storage service by configuring Apple mobile devices to require users to sign up for iCloud to store certain digital files, allegedly in violation of federal and state antitrust laws and California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • March 01, 2024

    Elon Musk Takes On OpenAI’s Altman With Contract, UCL Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — OpenAI’s founders breached the company’s founding agreements dictating that it operate as a nonprofit and be open source when they partnered with Microsoft in exchange for millions of dollars, Elon Musk alleges in a Feb. 29 lawsuit filed in California against Sam Altman for breach of contract and violation of the California unfair competition law (UCL).

  • February 29, 2024

    Plaintiffs Say PFAS Complaint Against L’Oreal Is Supported By Lab Test Results

    NEW YORK — The plaintiffs who argue that L’Oreal USA Inc. is liable for making and selling mascara that contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have filed a brief in New York federal court contending that L’Oreal’s motion to dismiss their claim should be denied because it has concealed the fact that its products contain PFAS, knowing that that information would cause consumers to purchase another product.

  • February 29, 2024

    Panel Reverses Dismissal Of UCL Claim Brought By Car Purchaser Who Lost $300,000

    LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel reversed the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by the prospective buyer of “high-end vehicles” who accused the woman who organized the purchase of deceiving him into paying $300,000 but ultimately providing no vehicles, finding that the plaintiff sufficiently alleged unfair conduct in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • February 29, 2024

    Plaintiff Dismisses Suit Claiming ‘Sweepstakes’ App Caused Gambling Losses

    LOS ANGELES — A putative class plaintiff on Feb. 28 filed a notice of voluntary dismissal in California federal court of his claims against an app company for violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by allegedly enticing him into illegal sports gambling two months after a judge granted a motion to compel arbitration of his all his claims.

  • February 29, 2024

    Justices Suggest Remand, Express Confusion In Crypto Sweepstakes Arbitration Row

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In Feb. 28 oral arguments, the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly returned to questions about why a dispute about contractual arbitration and delegation provisions between a cryptocurrency exchange and sweepstakes entrants ended up before them, with the option of remand seeming to gain momentum over the course of the session.

  • February 28, 2024

    Initial OK Given To $2.45 Million Settlement Of Debt Collector Data Breach Suit

    SEATTLE — Two months after the proposed settlement of a class action over the 2022 breach of a debt collector’s network was sent back for some fine-tuning, a Washington federal judge granted a renewed motion for preliminary approval of a $2.45 million agreement, finding that the parties cured ambiguous language in its scope of release and sufficiently identified the range of attorney fees and costs amounts sought.

  • February 27, 2024

    Judge: PREP Act Applies To Class Action Alleging Injuries From COVID-19 Drug

    LOS ANGELES — Patients and their family members who allege injuries after being prescribed and ingesting an antiviral drug used to treat severe COVID-19 symptoms saw their putative class action dismissed by a California federal judge who found that the manufacturer has immunity under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act).

  • February 27, 2024

    Call Of Duty Players Say Activision’s Esports Monopoly Caused $120M In Damages

    LOS ANGELES — Two professional players of the video game “Call of Duty” (CoD) and one affiliated business entity allege in a complaint filed in California federal court that developer Activision Blizzard Inc. has violated the federal Sherman Act, California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by monopolizing all CoD-related esports and excluding existing teams, allegedly causing the plaintiffs more than $120 million in damages.

  • February 23, 2024

    Gig Economy Company Agrees To Settlement Including Worker Reclassification

    SAN FRANCISCO — A gig economy staffing company accused of violating California’s unfair competition law, the state’s labor code and San Francisco ordinances by misclassifying its workers as independent contractors has agreed to a settlement in a lawsuit in California court to convert its misclassified California workers to employees, according to a final judgment and injunction filed Feb. 22.

  • February 22, 2024

    Epic Calls Apple’s $73 Million Costs, Fees Tab In Antitrust Dispute An Overreach

    OAKLAND, Calif. — Responding to Apple Inc.’s motion that it be required to indemnify more than $73 million in court costs and other fees related to their 3-1/2-year monopolization row, Epic Games Inc. tells a California federal court that most of the amounts sought are unrecoverable under controlling precedent, California law and the very agreement under which the defendant seeks indemnification.

  • February 21, 2024

    Panel Trims $933K From $22.3M Penalty Against Online School For Misrepresentations

    SAN DIEGO — A California appeals court panel on Feb. 20 reduced a $22.3 million judgment in civil penalties against an online education company and its former online university by approximately $933,000 but otherwise affirmed the judgment after finding that the California attorney general’s office properly established more than 1 million violations of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and false advertising law (FAL) based on deceptive calls to lure in students.

  • February 21, 2024

    Judge Grants Stipulated Dismissal In AI-Tax Prep, UCL, Advertising Suit

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A federal judge on Feb. 20 approved a stipulated dismissal in a case involving two companies locked in a battle over whether the advertising of artificial intelligence tax preparation software violated the California unfair competition law.

  • February 21, 2024

    Magistrate Judge Grants Motion To Strike Bad Faith Claim In Water Damage Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal magistrate judge denied a business insurer’s motion to dismiss claims for promissory estoppel and unfair competition but granted the insurer’s motion to strike a bad faith claim in the insured’s complaint, which seeks coverage for water damages at the insured’s business, after determining that the bad faith claim is duplicative of the insured’s claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

  • February 20, 2024

    Google Says UCL, Other Claims In AI Training Lawsuit Fail

    SAN FRANCISCO — Vague allegations and hypothetical damages involving the scraping of websites and other sources for data used in the training of artificial intelligence cannot form the basis of California unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims because the potential usage was adequately disclosed and individuals lack a privacy interest in information they themselves publicly disclosed, Google LLC tells a federal judge in California in seeking dismissal.

  • February 20, 2024

    High Court Won’t Hear Meta’s Appeal Over Standing In Biased Housing Ads Row

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In its Feb. 20 order list, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari by Meta Platforms Inc. (formerly Facebook Inc.) in a putative class action in which it has been accused of participating in housing discrimination, leaving unanswered the social network operator’s question over the proper standard for determining whether a plaintiff has standing to sue under Article III of the U.S. Constitution.

  • February 16, 2024

    Class Certification Affirmed In Dispute Over Insurer’s Square Footage Calculation

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower federal court’s ruling that granted an insured’s motion for class certification in a lawsuit alleging that a homeowners insurer improperly calculated the square footage of California homes, finding that the lower court did not abuse its discretion in redefining the certified class.

  • February 16, 2024

    Judge Disqualifies Law Firm From Job Search Sites’ Row Over Prior Representation

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A California federal judge hearing a lawsuit brought by the operators of a job search and resume-creation website against a competitor for copyright infringement and violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) granted the plaintiffs’ motion to disqualify a law firm whose attorneys included the defendant’s general counsel and one defendant’s wife, due to the firm’s prior representation of the plaintiffs.

  • February 15, 2024

    Judge Dismisses UCL Suit Accusing Gas Stove Maker Of Concealing Pollutants

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge found that a consumer has standing to bring claims that he was deceived into overpaying for a gas stove because the manufacturer allegedly concealed that it emits air pollutants when used as directed, but granted the manufacturer’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s California consumer protection law claims with prejudice for failure to comply with presuit notice requirements for toxic exposure claims.

  • February 15, 2024

    California AG, Company Settle Medical Waste, Patient Records Disposal Suit For $5M

    STOCKTON, Calif. — The California Attorney General’s Office and a medical diagnostics company filed a stipulation for entry of final judgment and permanent injunction in a state court, under which the company will pay roughly $5 million in part for civil penalties under California’s unfair competition law (UCL) due to the company’s improper disposal of medical waste and patient records.

  • February 14, 2024

    Consent Decree Entered Under 1 Dismissal In Case Over Alleged Counterfeit Policies

    LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A variety of claims and parties have been dismissed under agreements in a sprawling suit over allegations of fraud, trademark counterfeiting and trademark infringement involving captive reinsurance programs, with a Kentucky federal court permanently enjoining two defendants “from future infringement of Plaintiffs’ trademarks.”