Mealey's California Section 17200

  • September 27, 2023

    Provider’s Distinct Injuries Permit 2nd Suit Against Insurer, Court Says

    LOS ANGELES — Because a medical provider’s second lawsuit seeking compensation from an insurer involves different claims and injuries arising from distinct time periods, it does not constitute impermissible claim splitting, and a trial court erred in imposing sanctions for filing it, a California appeals court said Sept. 26 in reviving California unfair competition law (UCL) and other causes of action.

  • September 27, 2023

    Decongestant Makers, Retailers Face Class Claims For Selling Ineffective Products

    SAN FRANCISCO — Two new putative class lawsuits filed in California federal court accuse multiple defendants of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by selling decongestant products to millions of consumers that contained an active ingredient that a Food Drug and Administration advisory panel recently agreed is not effective as advertised

  • September 26, 2023

    Hearing Scheduled After Settlement Notice Filed In Franchisor Classification Case

    SAN FRANCISCO — A hearing was scheduled for Sept. 27 in a cleaning service franchisee classification class dispute after the franchisor filed a notice that the parties reached a settlement agreement that will provide up to $30 million; the federal judge in California stated in the order that the status of the settlement and whether to vacate the October trial date will be considered at the hearing.

  • September 25, 2023

    Judge Relates Authors’ AI Suits Against Meta For Copyright Infringement

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on Sept. 22 brought a putative class action against Meta Platforms Inc. for copyright infringement in its training of its artificial intelligence software filed by authors including Michael Chabon into the docket of a similar suit filed by a group of writers including comedian Sarah Silverman, who had moved to relate the cases.

  • September 22, 2023

    Judge Certifies Classes Of Smokers Deceived By American Spirits ‘Natural’ Claims

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A New Mexico federal judge published the redacted version of his opinion granting in part a motion to certify a class of smokers accusing three tobacco companies of mislabeling American Spirit-brand cigarettes as “natural” and “additive-free,” shortly after three tobacco companies petitioned the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for permission to challenge the certification order, which was previously issued to the parties under seal.

  • September 22, 2023

    AI Health Care Company Seeks To Defend Common-Law Trademark

    SAN FRANCISCO — A company’s registration of an already-in-use trademark and its intention to use the mark going forward sow confusion and tie the name’s existing goodwill to a disreputable entrepreneur in violation of the California unfair competition law (UCL), among others, a company hoping to use artificial intelligence in the medical education space says in a complaint.

  • September 21, 2023

    Sarah Silverman Seeks To Relate AI Suit Against Meta With Michael Chabon’s

    SAN FRANCISCO — A group of writers including comedian Sarah Silverman moved in California federal court to relate their putative class action against Meta Platforms Inc. for copyright infringement in its training of its artificial intelligence software with a similar suit filed by authors including Michael Chabon, one day after Meta moved to dismiss the litigation involving Silverman.

  • September 20, 2023

    Plaintiffs Dismiss Suit Challenging AI Chatbot Privacy Practices

    SAN FRANCISCO — After warning that the release of artificial intelligence was done with “disregard for the potentially catastrophic risk to humanity,” 16 anonymous plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their complaint claiming that Microsoft Corp. and others violated federal privacy laws and state consumer protection laws, including California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • September 18, 2023

    9th Circuit Vacates Dismissal Of UCL Suit Against Nestle For ‘White Morsels’

    SAN FRANCISCO — Citing new state law precedent involving a similar lawsuit, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a California federal judge’s dismissal of a lawsuit in which purchasers of Nestlé’s “Toll House Premier White Morsels” accused the company of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by misleading them into believing the product is made of white chocolate.

  • September 18, 2023

    9th Circuit Reverses Dismissal Of Suit Over ‘Wet Ones’ Germ-Killing Claims

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal of a consumer’s lawsuit claiming that a sanitary wipe product maker violated California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by falsely claiming that its product “Kills 99.99% of Germs,” finding that the court misconstrued the reasonable consumer standard.

  • September 18, 2023

    Judge Says Plaintiff Suing Supplement Maker Failed To Plead Caloric Mislabeling

    SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge granted a supplement maker’s motion to dismiss a putative class action accusing it of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by misrepresenting its products as containing zero calories after finding that the plaintiff failed to establish its methodology for testing the product’s caloric content.

  • September 18, 2023

    9th Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Suit Against Apple For IDevices’ Defects, Slowdown

    SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals split panel affirmed a federal judge’s dismissal for failure to state a claim a putative class suit claiming that Apple Inc. violated California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other statutes by concealing the fact that its software updates to fix security defects in iPhones, iPods, iPads and Apple TVs (collectively, iDevices) significantly slowed their performance.

  • September 15, 2023

    California High Court Won’t Review UCL Mental Health Coverage Ruling

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The California Supreme Court denied a petition for review after a lower court published its opinion finding that two insureds adequately alleged standing under the California unfair competition law (UCL) and that the way the insurer handles mental health care results in shortages of that care.

  • September 14, 2023

    Judge Dismisses Class Suit Accusing Herb, Spice Maker Of Concealing Heavy Metals

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A California federal judge on Sept. 13 granted an herb and spice maker’s motion to dismiss a putative class action accusing it of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other state consumer protection laws by failing to disclose the presence of heavy metals in products as was discovered during independent testing by Consumer Reports.

  • September 14, 2023

    Brita Water Filters Fail To Remove PFAS, Plaintiff Claims In Putative Class Suit

    LOS ANGELES — A consumer filed a putative class action in California state court accusing a water filter maker of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other state consumer protection laws by allegedly misrepresenting its products’ abilities to purify water when the products in fact do not remove contaminants such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

  • September 13, 2023

    Company Denies UCL Liability For ‘Incidental Presence’ Of PFAS In Smoothie Drinks

    SAN DIEGO — A beverage maker on Sept. 12 moved in California federal court to dismiss a putative class action accusing it of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by concealing the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in its fruit juice smoothie products, writing that the plaintiffs lack standing as they do not allege that it intentionally added PFAS to the products or that it intentionally deceived consumers.

  • September 13, 2023

    Award-Winning Writers Sue AI Developers For Unfairly Using Copyrighted Books

    SAN FRANCISCO — Pulitzer Prize-winning author Michael Chabon, his wife and fellow author Ayelet Waldman and three other writers on Sept. 12 filed a putative class action in California federal court against Meta Platforms Inc. accusing it of copyright infringement and violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by integrating their copyrighted written works into a dataset it uses to train artificial intelligence software, days after they sued OpenAI for similar conduct.

  • September 12, 2023

    Class Claims OpenAI Violated UCL, Privacy Law In Training ChatGPT

    SAN FRANCISCO — Plaintiffs in a putative class action say artificial intelligence ChatGPT trained on private and personally identifiable information from hundreds of individuals of all ages in violation of federal and state privacy laws and the California unfair competition law (UCL).

  • September 11, 2023

    Judge Won’t Dismiss Putative Class UCL Suit Against Orthotic Shoe Maker

    OAKLAND, Calif. — A California federal judge on Sept. 8 granted in part and denied in part an orthotic shoe company’s motion to dismiss a putative class action brought against it by a customer who claimed its products provided her no pain relief, denying the motion as to the plaintiff’s claim for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • September 11, 2023

    Roblox Digital Good Purchaser Seeks Final Approval Of $10M Settlement

    SAN FRANCISCO — A class action plaintiff moved in a California federal court for final approval of a $10 million settlement to resolve putative class claims that will return more than half of “Robux” that 8 million users of the Roblox online video game lost when the game deleted in-game digital items the users had purchased, allegedly in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • September 11, 2023

    Tesla Solar Roof Customers Again Seek Approval Of $6.08M Settlement

    SAN FRANCISCO — Solar roof customers who filed a class complaint in a federal court in California accusing Tesla Inc. of increasing the cost for solar roofs after customers sign contracts filed a renewed motion for preliminary approval of a $6.08 million settlement, arguing that they have provided the additional information regarding the claims and calculations the court requested.

  • September 11, 2023

    Some Google Assistant Class Members Agreed To Arbitrate Privacy Suit, Google Says

    SAN JOSE, Calif.  — In a reply brief supporting its motion to compel arbitration with certain class members in a suit over its Google Assistant (GA) feature, Google LLC disputes that it waived its right to seek arbitration, citing a conclusion to that end by the California federal court where three such suits were consolidated.

  • September 08, 2023

    L.A. Files UCL Suit Against Short-Term Rental Company For Hosting ‘Unruly Parties’

    LOS ANGELES — The city attorney’s office of Los Angeles County filed a lawsuit in state court accusing a short-term rental company of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and causing a public nuisance, saying it is violating local ordinances on short-term rentals and hosting parties that led to more than 250 calls to the police (People of the State of California v. Ultimate Host, LLC, et al., No. 23STCV19069, Calif. Super., Los Angeles Co.).

  • September 08, 2023

    Meta Pixel Privacy Suit Discovery To Include Files Of Zuckerberg, Executives

    SAN FRANCISCO — Meta Platforms Inc.’s searches for documents responsive to the discovery requests of the plaintiffs in a consolidated lawsuit over alleged sharing of patients’ protected health information (PHI) via Meta’s Pixel product will include searches of the files of six Meta executives, including its Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg, a California federal magistrate judge ruled, finding that their files were likely to include “unique, relevant information” that would not be available to other custodians who are junior employees.

  • September 07, 2023

    Solicitor General Asks High Court Not To Hear National Bank Act Preemption Cases

    WASHINGTON D.C. — The U.S. solicitor general urged the Supreme Court in an amicus curiae brief to deny petitions for writs of certiorari on the grounds that lower courts failed to apply the proper assessment of the degree to which the National Bank Act (NBA) preempts state laws in two unrelated appeals regarding whether lenders are required to pay interest on mortgage escrow accounts.