Mealey's California Insurance
-
January 23, 2023
Insurer’s Denial Of Defense To Developer In Defects Suit Was Not In Bad Faith
SAN DIEGO — A California appellate court panel ruled that a trial court did not err in granting summary adjudication in favor of an insurer on a bad faith claim in a coverage dispute stemming from the insurer’s failure to defend a developer and contractor in a construction defects lawsuit because a genuine dispute existed between the parties at the time the developer and contractor made their request to the insurer to contribute to their defense costs.
-
January 19, 2023
Panel Reverses Ruling For Insurer In Movie Theater Owner’s COVID-19 Coverage Suit
SAN DIEGO — A California appeals panel held that although a movie theater owner insured’s coronavirus coverage complaint fails to allege a scenario triggering coverage under its commercial business insurance policy’s business income losses and business access prevention by civil authority provisions, the policy contains other provisions for which the lower court should have granted the insured leave to amend.
-
January 17, 2023
9th Circuit Refuses To Disturb Ruling Against Insurer In Forgery Coverage Dispute
PASADENA, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 13 refused to rehear its reversal of a federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of an insurer in a bank insured’s lawsuit seeking coverage for its losses resulting from a forgery, standing by its decision that the lower court erred in finding that the insured failed to satisfy the policy’s first coverage element.
-
January 13, 2023
California Panel Affirms Ruling In Favor Of Manufacturers In Insurer’s Defects Suit
LOS ANGELES — A California appeals panel affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of manufacturers in an insurer’s lawsuit alleging strict liability manufacturing defect and strict liability design defect claims, rejecting the insurer’s argument that the lower court erred in finding that it failed to establish a prima facie case of liability under the risk/benefit test and in declining to assess the insurer’s design defect claim under the consumer expectations test.
-
January 11, 2023
Lens Manufacturer, Calif. Insurance Department Settle Whistleblower Case For $23.8M
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A company that manufactures and markets ophthalmic lenses and its subsidiaries have agreed to pay $23.8 million to resolve allegations that they violated the California Insurance Frauds Prevention Act (IFPA) by providing kickbacks and other unlawful incentives to eye care providers, driving consumers to more expensive services and submitting false claims to insurance companies, health care savings plans and vision benefit organizations.
-
January 11, 2023
California Panel Affirms Judgment For Defendants In Fraudulent Billing Action
LOS ANGELES — A state court did not err in finding that a relator and the California Department of Insurance (CDI) failed to present sufficient evidence that a hospital and others violated the Insurance Fraud Prevention Act (IFPA) by billing insurers for services performed at a medical detoxification center that was not properly licensed and using a referral agency to steer patients to the center, a California appellate panel has ruled.
-
January 11, 2023
Insured Appeals Ruling In California Coverage Suit Over Postponed Metallica Shows
LOS ANGELES — An insured filed a notice of appeal challenging a California judge’s summary judgment ruling in favor of an insurer in the insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit seeking coverage under a “Cancellation, Abandonment and Non-Appearance Insurance” policy for the postponement of the last six shows of Metallica’s South American tour in 2020.
-
January 10, 2023
Panel Publishes Reversal Of Dismissal Of UCL Claim For Denied COVID-19 Coverage
LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel granted an amicus curiae’s request to publish its earlier ruling reversing a trial court’s grant of an insurer’s demurrer to claims that it violated California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by denying an Italian restaurant’s claim for physical damage from the COVID-19 virus based on the restaurant’s forced closure, writing that the claims were “sufficient to withstand demurrer.”
-
January 10, 2023
Parties Stipulate To Dismissal Of Suit Over Fee Calculation, Payment, Indemnity
LOS ANGELES — Stipulating to dismissal with prejudice of a breach of contract action including alleged violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL), the parties in a suit over allegations that an administrative service provider mistakenly underpaid itself by approximately $40 million provided little detail to a California federal court.
-
January 09, 2023
Federal Judge Dismisses Legionnaire’s Disease Coverage Suit Following Settlement
RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A California federal judge dismissed an insurer’s suit seeking a declaration that no coverage is owed for suits arising out of exposure to Legionnaire’s disease after the parties notified the court they had reached a settlement.
-
January 05, 2023
United Policyholders Files Brief In Support Of Insured In Suit Arising From Opioid Epidemic
SAN FRANCISCO — United Policyholders filed an amicus curiae brief in support of a prescription drug distributor insured’s appeal of a lower federal court’s ruling that underlying lawsuits prompted by the opioid epidemic fail to allege an “accident” under California law, arguing to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that the lower court’s “conclusion is contrary to the very purpose of insurance as it has developed over the course of many centuries.”
-
January 05, 2023
9th Circuit Certifies Question To California High Court In COVID-19 Coverage Suit
SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals certified to the California Supreme Court the question of whether “the actual or potential presence of the COVID-19 virus on an insured's premises” constitutes “direct physical loss or damage to property” to trigger coverage under the insured’s commercial property insurance policy.
-
January 03, 2023
Panel Affirms Finding That No Coverage Owed For Judgment In Contamination Suit
SAN FRANCISCO — A district court properly found that an insurer has no duty to indemnify a city on behalf of its insured for a judgment entered against the insured in an underlying environmental contamination dispute because the releases of contaminants into the groundwater are excluded by the policies’ pollution exclusion as the releases were expected and intended by the insured, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said.
-
January 03, 2023
Insurer Must Pay Insureds’ Defense Costs Incurred In Environmental Suits
SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California federal judge said that an insurer must pay defense costs incurred by its insureds in underlying environmental contamination lawsuits because the insurer has a duty to defend the insureds and the insurer’s intent to appeal the court’s ruling on the duty-to-defend issue does not provide a basis for the insurer’s refusal to pay the defense costs.
-
December 29, 2022
Dismissal Stipulation Ends Force-Placed Insurance, Mortgage Loan Dispute
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Less than a month after reporting reaching an unspecified settlement with the remaining defendant in the putative class suit over home mortgage loan servicing and a reinsurance program, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice in a California federal court.
-
December 20, 2022
California Federal Judge Enters Judgment For Insured In Water Damage Suit
LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge entered judgment in favor of an insured in a water damage dispute after a jury awarded the insured $125,000 for water damage sustained in the insured’s home as a result of a water leak in the insured’s home.
-
December 20, 2022
Lack Of Reinsurance Claim Cited In Breach Of Contract Suit Against Medical Group
LOS ANGELES — Asserting that it expects to prove damages of more than $1 million, the operator of an independent physician’s association (IPA) sued a medical group in California state court over a deal including reinsurance of a shared risk incentive pool, alleging claims including breach of written contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
-
December 16, 2022
Panel Reverses Dismissal Of Restaurant’s UCL Claim For Denial Of COVID-19 Coverage
LOS ANGELES — A California appellate court panel reversed a trial court’s grant of an insurer’s demurrer to claims that it violated California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and breached an Italian restaurant’s business interruption insurance policy by denying a claim for physical damage from the COVID-19 virus based on the restaurant’s forced closure, writing that the claims were “sufficient to withstand demurrer.”
-
December 15, 2022
Certiorari Sought Over Prior Exclusive Jurisdiction Ruling In Conservatorship Row
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Seeking U.S. Supreme Court review in an insurance conservatorship dispute, petitioners argue that the challenged affirmation of dismissal “conflicts with longstanding precedent of this Court and various circuit courts as to the scope of two judge-made rules governing when federal courts must abstain from adjudicating constitutional claims against state officials under” 42 U.S. Code Section 1983.
-
December 12, 2022
Arbitrator Disclosures Are Among Disputed Issues In Fight Over Award
SANTA ANA, Calif. — Parties in a California appellate case challenging confirmation of an arbitration panel’s ruling against a university are disputing issues including deadlines and disclosures by an arbitrator whose firm had worked for reinsurers of the appellant.
-
December 08, 2022
Motion To Remand Disability Suit Denied; Diversity Of Citizenship Exists, Judge Says
LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge denied a disability claimant’s motion to remand a breach of contract and bad faith suit after determining that complete diversity of citizenship exists between the parties because the claimant fraudulently joined an individual who conducted surveillance video on behalf of the disability insurer in an attempt to avoid federal jurisdiction.
-
December 07, 2022
Judge: Insured’s Material Misrepresentation On Auto Policy Bars Accident Coverage
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — A California judge granted an automobile liability insurer’s motion for summary judgment in its declaratory judgment lawsuit disputing coverage for an accident, concluding that the insured made a material misrepresentation as to the use of his vehicles on the insurance application.
-
December 07, 2022
9th Circuit: Forklift Parade Did Not Trigger Policy’s Mobile Equipment Exclusion
PASADENA, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed a lower court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of an insurer in a coverage dispute over a personal injury lawsuit arising from an injury that happened during a “forklift parade,” finding that the policy’s mobile equipment exclusion does not apply to the insureds’ conduct.
-
December 07, 2022
Panel Remands TCPA Coverage Suit To Determine Yahoo’s Reasonable Expectations
SAN FRANCISCO — Following the California Supreme Court’s answer to a certified question, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Dec. 6 reversed and remanded a coverage dispute between Yahoo! Inc. and its commercial general liability insurer over claims brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) to determine Yahoo’s reasonable expectations as to coverage.
-
December 07, 2022
Claimant Met Burden Of Showing She Is Disabled From Sedentary Occupation
LOS ANGELES — A disability claimant is entitled to long-term disability (LTD) benefits, a California federal judge said after determining that the claimant showed by a preponderance of the evidence that she is more than likely disabled from performing the duties of a sedentary occupation.