Mealey's Artificial Intelligence

  • June 15, 2023

    On Heels Of Infringement Complaint, Tesla Seeks Review Of AI Patent

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — A recent request for inter partes review (IPR) filed by Tesla Inc. seeks cancellation of 20 claims of a patent directed to a system for autonomous device operation.

  • June 05, 2023

    COMMENTARY: Embracing AI: Why Small Law Firms Must Leverage Competitive Advantage

    By Luis Salazar

  • June 13, 2023

    AI Marketing Company Sues AI Ad Firm For Contract, Trade Secret Violations

    SAN ANTONIO — An artificial intelligence (AI) marketing firm filed suit against a company with which it had a business agreement, telling a Texas federal court that the company “lured [it] into providing access to its platform and proprietary assets” for the purpose of misappropriating them.

  • June 12, 2023

    With Eye Toward Confidential Business Info, Judge Imposes AI Restrictions

    NEW YORK — Hoping to prevent the disclosure of confidential or propriety business information, a judge in an international trade court issued courtroom rules governing the “novel risks” posed by generative artificial intelligence.

  • June 12, 2023

    Copyright Owners Amend Complaint Against OpenAI Over GitHub AI Tool

    OAKLAND, Calif. — Copyright owners filed an amended class action complaint alleging, among other things, violation of the California unfair competition law (UCL), saying OpenAI Inc. and others employed an artificial intelligence program for use on software hub GitHub that reproduces licensed code.

  • June 12, 2023

    Punish Conduct, Not Lawyer’s Use Of Tool Like ChatGPT, Amici Tells Court

    NEW YORK — Courts should exercise caution in sanctioning attorneys and imposing rules surrounding the use of artificial intelligence to avoid negative fallout including impaired growth of the tool and its usage, a company representative says in an amicus brief after an attorney told a court that he was “truly mortified” to learn artificial intelligence ChatGPT simply made up the legal research he asked it to perform.

  • June 08, 2023

    ChatGPT’s Use In Brief Stemmed From Misunderstanding, Lawyer And Firm Say

    NEW YORK — Counsel’s reliance on ChatGPT stemmed from a “fundamental misunderstanding” and at most demonstrates poor judgment, not bad faith or an intent to deceive the court, a lawyer and his law firm tell a federal judge in New York, responding to an order to show why sanctions shouldn’t be imposed.

  • June 08, 2023

    Georgia Man Claims ChatGPT Made Up Lawsuit Details, Defamed Him

    LAWRENCEVILLE, Ga. — Artificial intelligence ChatGPT told a reporter that a lawsuit involved allegations that Mark Walters committed financial misconduct — going so far as to produce a fabricated complaint — even though Walters wasn’t employed by the company in question and isn’t involved in the case, Walters says in a state court complaint seeking damages from the program’s parent, OpenAI LLC.

  • June 06, 2023

    Parties Brief Dismissal In AI Lending Platform Securities Class Action

    CINCINNATI — Optimistic statements about how an artificial intelligence lending platform would perform cannot form the basis of a securities class action, and the class never shows that the alleged misrepresentations were false, let alone false when they were made, defendants argue in a pair of reply briefs in support of motions to dismiss filed in an Ohio federal court.

  • June 06, 2023

    Lawyer Cites ChatGPT Responses In Declaration Supporting Attorney Fees

    NEW YORK — An attorney in a federal court in New York supported his claim for fees by citing a conversation he had with artificial intelligence ChatGPT, saying in part that it was important to know what consumers with access to the technology would expect to pay.

  • June 06, 2023

    Judge: Lawyers Must Certify Whether They Used AI, Checked Its Accuracy

    DALLAS — Lawyers must either certify that ChatGPT and other similar generative artificial intelligence played no role in the creation of a filing or that any language drafted by such programs was checked for accuracy against print reporters or traditional legal databases, a federal judge in Texas said.

  • June 05, 2023

    Stay Derivative Action, AI Lending Securities Defendants Say

    WILMINGTON, Del. — Staying a derivative action pending the outcome of a securities class action involving allegations that a company overstated the ability of its artificial intelligence lending system would conserve both party and court resources, defendants tell the Delaware Chancery Court.

  • June 02, 2023

    Magistrate Quotes ‘2001:  A Space Odyssey’ In Setting AI Court Rules

    CHICAGO — Any party relying on artificial intelligence for a filing must inform the court of the use and the specific tool used for research or writing, a federal magistrate judge in Illinois said in a new standing order.

  • May 22, 2023

    COMMENTARY: Intellectual Property Legal Issues Impacting Artificial Intelligence

    By Edward D. Lanquist and Dominic Rota

  • May 30, 2023

    Judge Threatens Sanctions After ChatGPT-Produced Brief Cites Fake Cases

    NEW YORK — An attorney and his law firm must appear at a June hearing to show why they should not be sanctioned for submitting an opposition brief with fake cites created through the use of artificial intelligence software ChatGPT, a federal judge in New York said May 26.

  • May 30, 2023

    Judge Denies Certified Question, Says Parties Must Unwind AI Merger Software Sale

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — A company may rescind the sale of artificial intelligence software that analyzes mergers, acquisitions and other investments after prevailing on a fraudulent inducement claim, a federal judge in Ohio said after declining to certify a question to the Ohio Supreme Court.

  • May 26, 2023

    Magistrate: AI Concerns Among Reasons To Preclude Evidence Release In ERISA Case

    SALT LAKE CITY — Citing in part potential concerns that competitors could use artificial intelligence and machine learning to create derivative products if a vendor’s health care guidance information were publicly released, a federal magistrate judge in Utah granted a motion for a protective order and rejected the argument that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act mandated release of the evidence.

  • May 16, 2023

    DMCA, UCL Claims Against Microsoft, GitHub Over AI Tools Largely Dismissed

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge dismissed most of the claims brought by two John Doe plaintiffs against Microsoft Corp., GitHub Inc. and OpenAI LP over the purported misuse of open-source code in artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including alleged violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and California’s unfair competition law (UCL), with the judge finding failures to establish standing and plead injuries, among other things.

  • May 03, 2023

    Match Group’s Discovery, Seal Motions Denied In FTC Enforcement Action

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Match Group Inc. failed to establish that the Federal Trade Commission initiated an action to enforce a civil investigative demand (CID) with improper motives, a District of Columbia federal magistrate judge ruled, denying the dating website operator’s motion to conduct related discovery, while also denying the company’s motion to seal the proceedings in which the FTC seeks documents related to its investigation of the purported sharing of users’ pictures and information with a facial recognition firm.

  • April 24, 2023

    SCOTUS Passes On Question Of Patent Inventorship For AI

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court in its April 24 order list denied a petition for writ of certiorari that posed the question of whether the term “inventor” is limited to a human being, in a blow to the artificial intelligence (AI) industry.

  • April 21, 2023

    Generative AI Firms Move To Dismiss Artists’ Unfair Competition, Copyright Claims

    SAN FRANCISCO — Three companies involved in the field of content-generation artificial intelligence (AI) filed motions to dismiss putative class copyright infringement and unfair competition claims, telling a California federal court that the plaintiff artists fail to allege that any images created by their respective programs are derivative of their copyrighted works that were purportedly used to “train” their technology.

  • April 17, 2023

    Professors Urge High Court To Recognize Inventorship Of Artificial Intelligence

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Filing an amicus curiae brief in support of a petitioner who sought registration of two patents he attributed to his artificial intelligence (AI) system, a group of four professors ask the U.S. Supreme Court to grant the petition for certiorari and “recognize that AI systems have been producing inventions constituting patentable subject matter for decades,” asserting that the practice of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to deny patent registration to AI systems is “unwarranted” under the Patent Act.

  • April 14, 2023

    McDonald’s Granted Protective Order In AI Voiceprint Class Lawsuit

    CHICAGO — A federal judge in Illinois on April 13 granted a motion for a protective order sought by McDonald’s Corp. in a putative class complaint alleging that the franchisor violates Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting voiceprints to place drive-through orders.

  • April 06, 2023

    Panel Says Claims Court Correctly Dismissed Copyright Claim On Remand

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on April 5 left intact dismissal by the Court of Federal Claims of allegations by a pro se plaintiff that the federal government is liable for copyright infringement in connection with his scientific research on artificial intelligence (AI).

  • March 22, 2023

    High Court Asked To Decide If Artificial Intelligence Can Be A Patent Inventor

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals did not properly consider the definitions of “inventor” and “individual” when it held that artificial intelligence (AI) could not be listed as an inventor on a patent application, a petitioner tells the U.S.  Supreme Court, seeking a grant of certiorari for a question of whether the Patent Act requires that inventorship be limited to just human beings.