Mealey's (February 22, 2018, 2:52 PM EST) -- TOPEKA, Kan. — A Kansas court did not err in denying a plaintiff’s request to review the source codes for a program he helped develop and requiring review of the code to be done by a third party, while prohibiting him from using the third party as an expert witness because the plaintiff failed to name an expert witness during the allowable timeframe, a Kansas Court of Appeals panel ruled Feb. 16 in affirming the lower court’s ruling (John Macklin v. Liquidynamics Inc., No. 116,620, Kan. App., 2018 Kan. App. Unpub. LEXIS 115)....