(October 17, 2017, 1:48 PM EDT) -- MILWAUKEE — Courts — not individuals or companies — determine if conduct violates the law, and a judge mistakenly believed that the parties agreed that an insurer’s interpretation governed application of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) provision barring caps on essential health benefits, a dialysis provider argues in a Sept. 26 motion for reconsideration (Fresenius Medical Care Midwest Dialysis LLC, et al. v. Humana Insurance Co., et al., No. 16-711, E.D. Wis.)....