NEW ORLEANS — Hundreds of Indian tribes, more than 50 economic scholars, a handful of constitutional law experts who in the past opposed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) and two Republican-led states said striking down the entire law simply because Congress zeroed out the individual mandate penalty lacks any historic or legal precedent while warning about the far-reaching impact doing so would have. The amici were among 21 parties filing briefs on April 1 (Texas, et al. v. U.S.A., et al., No. 19-10011, 5th Cir.).
OKLAHOMA CITY — An Oklahoma law limiting who can sell American Indian artwork in the state is preempted by the federal Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 (IACA) because the state law unconstitutionally disturbs the purpose of the IACA to promote and develop Native American art, an Oklahoma federal judge held March 28 in awarding an Indian artist summary judgment on her challenge to the state statute (Peggy Fontenot v. Mike Hunter, No. 16-1339, W.D. Okla., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52859).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A full-blown consultation with American Indian tribes under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) is required before a company can operate a uranium mine in a national forest near the Grand Canyon that contains sacred Indian grounds, an Arizona tribe tells the U.S. Supreme Court in a March 21 petition for a writ of certiorari (Havasupai Tribe v. Heather C. Provencio, et al., No. 18-1239, U.S. Sup., 2019 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 1157).
TACOMA, Wash. — A Washington federal magistrate judge on July 25 dismissed a couple’s excessive force claims against tribal police officers at the request of the couple, who agreed that they should pursue their claims in tribal court (Robert Lewis, et al. v. United States, et al., No. 3:18-cv-05196, W.D. Wash., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49937).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court need not review a 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ holding that the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) does not authorize the transfer of jurisdiction from tribal courts to state courts for tort claims arising from a gaming operation because of the limited nature of the ruling, a tribe and its casino business argue in a March 13 response brief (Harold McNeal, et ux. v. Navajo Nation, et al., 18-894, U.S. Sup., 2019 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 1010).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Alaska’s Nation River is not public land under the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) and is exempt, as is all other nonpublic land in the state’s national parks, from the usual regulatory authority of the National Park Service (NPS), a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court held March 26 (John Sturgeon v. Bert Frost, et al., No. 17-949, U.S. Sup., 2019 U.S. LEXIS 2294).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court has been asked to decide whether Congress clearly abrogated tribal sovereign immunity in the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in a petition for a writ of certiorari docketed March 20 from creditors asserting fraudulent transfer claims against a Michigan Indian tribe and its gaming business (Buchwald Capital Advisors, LLC v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, et al., No. 18-1218, U.S. Sup.).
PASADENA, Calif. — In an issue of first impression, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held March 21 that the language of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) allows time limits to be placed on tribal-state gaming compacts (Chemehuevi Indian Tribe, et al. v. Gavin Newsom, et al., No. 17-55604, 9th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 8343).
NEWARK, N.J. — Two Indian tribes in New Jersey should be allowed to amend their complaint against a township because they state valid and ripe claims that the township discriminated against them by forcing them to stop holding religious ceremonies on their land, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) says in a March 18 statement of interest filed in New Jersey federal court (Ramapough Mountain Indians, Inc., et al. v. Mahwah Township, et al., No. 2:18-cv-9228, D. N.J.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Washington Indian tribe does not have to pay the state’s fuel tax on gasoline it hauls into the state to its reservation because subjecting the tribe to the tax would violate its treaty right to travel unburdened on public roads, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled March 19 in a 5-4 decision (Washington State Department of Licensing v. Cougar Den, Inc., No. 16-1498, U.S. Sup., 2019 U.S. LEXIS 2086 ).
BUFFALO, N.Y. — On the heels of a February determination that the state of New York may proceed with allegations that two Indian enterprises violated federal and state law by running a contraband cigarette ring, defendants in the case moved March 12 for a stay (New York v. Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd., et al., No. 14-cv-910, W.D. N.Y.).
NEW ORLEANS — A Texas Indian tribe suffered another defeat in its battle to conduct gaming on its land when the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals agreed March 14 that a 1987 statute barring gambling on the tribe’s land takes precedent over a 2015 National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) opinion that gaming is allowed on the land under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) (Texas v. Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas, No. 18-40116, 5th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 7559).
SAN FRANCISCO — A California tribal court has jurisdiction to hear fraud claims against the former tribal administrator, who is not a member of the tribe, due to the tribe’s “inherent sovereign power” and its regulatory authority, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held March 13 (Duanna Knighton v. Cedarville Rancheria of Northern Paiute Indians, et al., No. 17-15515, 9th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 7366).
SAN FRANCISCO — The Bureau of Indian Affairs’ (BIA) denial of federal recognition to a California tribe was neither arbitrary nor an abuse of discretion, a federal judge in that state ruled March 12 in awarding the agency summary judgment on the tribe’s bid for declaratory relief (Tolowa Nation v. United States, et al., No. 3:17-cv-6478, N.D. Calif.).
SEATTLE — The Department of the Interior (DOI) correctly determined that a Washington Indian tribe is not eligible to run a gambling operation under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held March 12 in affirming summary judgment for the federal government (Frank’s Landing Indian Community v. National Indian Gaming Commission, et al., No. 17-35368, 9th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 7216).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A case in which a drugmaker is trying to use an Indian tribe’s sovereign immunity to shield it from inter partes review (IPR) of its patents is a poor vehicle for the U.S. Supreme Court to decide the issue of tribal immunity for IPRs, respondent generic drugmakers tell the high court in a March 6 brief in opposition to a certiorari petition (Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al., No. 18-899, U.S. Sup., 2019 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 837).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court should reverse a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals finding that the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation are entitled to recover more than $8.25 million in response costs from a Canadian industrial polluter of the Columbia River for enforcement actions taken under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), the company liable for the pollution says in a petition for certiorari docketed March 6 (Teck Metals Ltd. v. The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, et al., No. 18-1160, U.S. Sup.).
SAN FRANCISCO — Two Native American tribes on March 6 filed an amicus curiae brief in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals arguing that it should deny a motion to stay an injunction filed by a pipeline company that wants to proceed with construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline, which the tribes say would threaten their land and water because it would transport hydraulically fractured oil (Indigenous Environmental Network, et al. v. United States Department of State, et al., No. 18-36068, 9th Cir.).
PASADENA, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 6 declined to review its affirmance of a California county’s collection of a state tax on U.S. trust lands leased by an Indian tribe and finding that the tax is not preempted by federal law (Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Riverside County, et al., No. 17-56003, 9th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 6767).
ATLANTA — Three Native American tribes that saw their claims against Equifax Inc. transferred and centralized in Georgia federal court along with hundreds of other similar suits filed a motion March 1 asking the court to establish a separate track in the litigation for tribal governments’ claims against the company, citing unique issues of law and sovereignty (In Re: Equifax Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, No. 1:17-md-2800, N.D. Ga.).