(June 20, 2018, 11:51 AM EDT) -- DENVER — Insureds on June 19 objected to a magistrate’s recommendation to deny their renewed motion for leave to amend their complaint in a dispute over coverage for more than $1.8 million in undelivered fine wine, contending the magistrate constructed an excuse for the insurer and then relied upon it to support his recommended dismissal (Malik M. Hasan, M.D., et al. v. AIG Property Casualty Co., No. 16-02963, D. Colo.)....