(October 2, 2019, 8:11 AM EDT) -- SAN FRANCISCO — A California couple tells an appeals panel in a brief filed Sept. 3 that a trial court judge erred when ordering a general contractor to pay $218,185.50 in attorney fees after they prevailed at trial, arguing that the construction contract between the parties contained a provision that required the contractor to pay all attorney fees if it is not the prevailing party (Philip Stolp, et al. v. Murphy-True Inc., No. A155426, Calif. App., 1st Dist., 1st Div., 2019 CA App. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 4848)....