Mealey's Class Actions

  • May 07, 2024

    Redfin Seeks To Settle Commissions Conspiracy Claims For $9.25 Million

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Redfin Corp. and home sellers who have accused the broker and others of violating the Sherman Act by entering into an agreement to artificially inflate the cost of commissions in residential real estate transactions filed in a federal court in Missouri on May 6 a notice of pending settlement and joint motion to stay as to Redfin; on the same day, Redfin filed a Form 8-K with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission stating that the settlement was for $9.25 million.

  • May 07, 2024

    Parties In ERISA Imprudence Case Over Funds Report Unspecified Global Deal

    SAN FRANCISCO — With a bench trial imminent, parties in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action over the allegedly imprudent retention of certain funds told a California federal court on May 6 that they reached an unspecified agreement “in principle to a global resolution” of the class action and a recently filed related case.

  • May 07, 2024

    Federal Judge Rules For Class On 2 Issues In ERISA Residual Annuities Case

    NEW YORK — After “resolving the two disputed issues” in favor of the class after a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that drew an unsuccessful certiorari petition, a New York federal judge has entered a revised final judgment in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action over residual annuities.

  • May 06, 2024

    ‘Waste Of Time’ Summary Judgment Ruling Trims ERISA Class Case Over Fees, Funds

    BOSTON — Saying “this entire summary judgment exercise has been a monumental waste of time,” a Massachusetts federal judge partly granted the defendants’ motion in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action challenging management of retirement plans but denied summary judgment as to imprudence allegations regarding record-keeping fees and retention of challenged funds.

  • May 06, 2024

    Mortgagors Appeal Finding That Broker Price Opinion Was Not An Inspection Fee

    GREENBELT, Md. — A couple who filed a putative class complaint against their lenders over a broker price opinion (BPO) fee that appeared on their account after their mortgage was identified as being in active loss mitigation and a putative class member who attempted to intervene filed a notice of appeal on May 4 after a federal magistrate judge in Maryland granted the lenders summary judgment and ruled that the BPO fee at issue was not an inspection fee prohibited by Maryland’s usury statute.

  • May 03, 2024

    On Remand, Judge Dismisses Putative Class Action Against Google For Banner Ads

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — On remand from the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, a federal judge in California dismissed with prejudice putative class claims brought against Google LLC by two website owners for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws in relation to Google’s former practice on its Android search app of superimposing its logo and a “Related Pages” banner on the plaintiffs’ websites, which featured links to competitors’ websites.

  • May 03, 2024

    2nd Circuit Affirms Expert Exclusion, Summary Judgment In Food Labeling Case

    NEW YORK — A district court properly excluded testimony from experts retained by a class of consumers who alleged that an “All Natural” claim on snack foods and granola bars is deceptive or misleading, the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said May 2, and because they failed to show that the company’s label would deceive a reasonable consumer, the court affirmed summary judgment and found that arguments that the court erred in decertifying the class are moot.

  • May 03, 2024

    Amended Complaint Planned In Fiduciary Breach Case Against Health Plans’ Sponsor

    CAMDEN, N.J. — In a granted joint stipulation, parties in a high-profile putative class Employee Retirement Income Security Act fiduciary duty case over alleged “mismanagement of prescription-drug benefits” told a New Jersey federal court they agree that a pending dismissal motion will be mooted by a forthcoming amended complaint.

  • May 03, 2024

    Production, Brief Ordered In Nonparty Discovery Disputes In Apple Antitrust Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — In response to recently filed briefs concerning discovery plaintiffs seek from two nonparties in their iPhone app monopolization class action against Apple Inc., a California federal magistrate judge issued an order partly granting their motion to compel certain records from app developer Rocket Money, while addressing the company’s concerns about discovery burdens and protecting the confidentiality of its records.

  • May 03, 2024

    Faulty Shingles Dispute Terminated Following Parties’ Notice Of Settlement

    KANSAS CITY, Kan. — After receiving notice of settlement from a group of property owners and roofing manufacturer, a Kansas federal judge ordered a dispute over the company’s allegedly faulty shingles to be administratively terminated.

  • May 02, 2024

    Split 2nd Circuit Affirms Effective Vindication Ruling In ERISA Arbitration Row

    NEW YORK — In a 2-1 ruling on a high-profile Employee Retirement Income Security Act issue, a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on May 1 upheld denial of a motion for individual arbitration over an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) deal, with the majority applying the effective vindication exception as three other circuits did “in closely analogous cases” and asserting that “this is not actually a class action.”

  • May 02, 2024

    Borrowers’ Class Suit Alleging Lender Wrongfully Denied COVID Relief Dismissed

    PHILADELPHIA — A federal judge in Pennsylvania on May 1 dismissed without prejudice borrowers’ putative class action alleging that their lender violated state and federal statutes when it denied some borrowers COVID-19 aid and approved only a portion of the aid for others, finding that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL) or the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).

  • May 02, 2024

    Judge Dismisses Consumer’s UCL Suit Against Herbal Cough Drop Maker

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A California federal judge granted a cough drop maker’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed without prejudice a putative class action filed against it by a consumer who claimed that it deceptively advertises its cough drops as offering herbal and medicinal benefits in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • May 02, 2024

    7th Circuit Vacates Class Certification Denial In Prisoner Dental Care Case

    CHICAGO — A Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel vacated a trial court’s denial of class certification in a case against an Illinois county and sheriff by a former detainee who alleges that he and others were denied sufficient dental care, finding that the lower court erred in concluding that commonality, typicality and superiority were not met; the appellate panel also declined the county’s argument that class representatives cannot receive incentive awards and instead ruled that they are appropriate for named plaintiffs “so long as they comply with the requirements of” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.

  • May 02, 2024

    Washington Jury Awards Hospital Workers More Than $98M In Wage, Hour Damages

    SEATTLE — A Washington jury returned a more than $98 million damages verdict for health care workers in a wage and hour class suit in which they alleged unlawful rounding practices and meal break denials.

  • May 02, 2024

    9th Circuit Affirms Class Certification In Marketing Of Pet Health Product Suit

    PASADENA, Calif. — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel upheld certification of a class of dog supplement purchasers who allege the products they bought were falsely marketed as improving joint health, finding that reliance on an unexecuted damages model to certify a class is permissible and that sufficient data was provided to support the certification ruling.

  • May 02, 2024

    Texas Ranch Owner’s Class Suit Blames Utility Companies For Smokehouse Creek Fire

    AMARILLO, Texas — A February 2024 fire in the Texas panhandle that burned more than 1 million acres was caused by an electrical line pole that snapped due to high winds, a Texas ranch owner alleges in his class complaint filed in a federal court in Texas against three utility companies that he alleges controlled or maintained the pole.

  • May 01, 2024

    New York City’s $17.5M Head Covering Removal Settlement Given Preliminary OK

    NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York granted preliminary approval of a $17.5 million settlement to be paid by New York City to end a class complaint by individuals who were forced to remove religious head coverings for post-arrest photos.

  • May 01, 2024

    Individual Settlement Reached In Papa John’s Website Data Collection Class Suit

    SAN DIEGO — A consumer who filed a putative class complaint accusing Papa John’s International Inc. of violating the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) through the interception and collection of users’ data on a pizza-ordering webpage filed a notice in a federal court in California stating that he reached an individual settlement.

  • May 01, 2024

    Jewish Student’s Class Suit Alleges Protests Cause Unsafe Environment At Columbia

    NEW YORK — Columbia University trustees have failed to ensure that students are safe and that their education has not been disrupted following the April 18 creation of a “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” on campus by protestors, a Jewish student referred to only by her initials alleges in a class complaint and motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) filed in a federal court in New York.

  • May 01, 2024

    Judge Awards $300,000 In Attorney Fees 3 Years After Retail Voucher Settlement

    SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge on April 30 granted in part plaintiffs’ motion for attorney fees arising from a 2021 voucher class settlement agreed to by a children’s clothing retailer that was accused of advertising false “original” prices when discounting its merchandise in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other state laws.

  • May 01, 2024

    9th Circuit Panel Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice Of UCL Asbestos-Talc Claims

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Plaintiffs in a class action “littered” a fifth amended complaint with descriptions of advertisements, but many appear unrelated to the asbestos-talc claims underpinning the California unfair competition law (UCL) allegations or lack the necessary evidence of reliance, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said in an unpublished memorandum affirming summary judgment for the defendants.

  • May 01, 2024

    California Chick-fil-A Delivery Price Class Suit Dismissed After Settlement In Ga.

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Chick-fil-A Inc. and a customer who brought a class complaint over the fast food company’s delivery prices filed a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice in a federal court in California after the claims were resolved as part of a settlement approved by a Georgia court in February; the California case had been stayed pending settlement since October 2022.

  • May 01, 2024

    Government, Health Plans Brief Tolling Opt-In Class Cases In ACA Reinsurance Row

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In supplemental briefing in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in consolidated cases over allegedly illegal exactions made under the Transitional Reinsurance Program (TRP) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), group health plans and the government agree that there’s a dearth of case law on American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah tolling for opt-in classes.

  • May 01, 2024

    $42.1M Attorney Fees, Final Approval Sought In Class ACA Reinsurance Row

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — None of the 357 class members has objected to a $169,022,397.28 settlement that would resolve part of a lawsuit over the Transitional Reinsurance Program (TRP) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) or a request that class counsel get 25% of that amount for attorney fees, the class representative told the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in a reply brief.