Judge Excludes Unfounded Expert Opinion, Grants Judgment In Asbestos Case

(June 23, 2016, 1:48 PM EDT) -- BALTIMORE — The evidence completely contradicts an expert’s conclusion that a man worked with asbestos-containing Micarta, a federal judge in Maryland held June 6, also granting partial summary judgment (Charles Lemuel Arbogast Jr., et al. v. A.W. Chesterton Co., et al., No. 14-4049, D. Md.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73425).

After doctors diagnosed Charles Arbogast with mesothelioma, he and his wife, Barbara Arbogast, sued 27 companies whose conduct allegedly exposed him to asbestos. Charles Arbogast allegedly suffered at least part of his exposure at the Sparrows...
To view the full article, register now.