Mirena IUD Plaintiffs, Bayer Disagree About Whether MDL Can Survive Experts Ruling

(March 24, 2016, 11:25 AM EDT) -- NEW YORK — Plaintiffs in the Mirena intrauterine device (IUD) multidistrict litigation on March 22 told a New York federal judge that despite the exclusion of general causation experts in the next two trials, they can still prove that the device can cause secondary perforations in the uterus (In Re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2434, No. 12-md-2434, Jennifer Danley v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 13-6586, Christie Hayes v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 14-288, S.D. N.Y.).

(Plaintiffs’ letter available. Document #28-160407-010X.)...
To view the full article, register now.