Plaintiff Failed To Show It Was Entitled To Relief Under UCL, Panel Says, Reverses

(April 14, 2020, 11:29 AM EDT) -- SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California appeals panel on March 24 held that there is insufficient evidence to support a lower court’s judgment in favor of plaintiffs on their California unfair competition law (UCL) claim because they failed to introduce evidence demonstrating that the name in question acquired a secondary meaning entitling them to relief under the UCL, reversing the lower court in part (Redding Gastroenterology, LLC v. Paramvir Singh et al., No. C087007, Calif. App., 3rd Dist., 2020 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1897)....

Attached Documents

Related Sections