Judge Rules On 13 Motions To Exclude In Insurers’ Receiver’s Case Against Banks

Mealey's (November 28, 2018, 8:43 AM EST) -- ST. LOUIS — A Missouri federal judge on Nov. 21 decided 13 motions to exclude evidence and expert testimony in a case among banks, a special deputy receiver and state insurance...

To view the full article, register now.

Try for FREE for fourteen days

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Printable Version

Documents

Memorandum and order
Plaintiffs’ motion in limine to strike PNC’s categorically improper deposition designations
Plaintiffs’ motion in limine to exclude PNC from presenting regulator and bank examiner conduct for purposes of arguing the standard of care, the lack of a breach of trust or limiting a punitive damages award
Defendants’ motion in limine to preclude plaintiffs’ experts from using the phrases “red flags” or a “Ponzi-like scheme"
Defendants’ motion in limine to renew portions of the court’s prior orders
Defendants’ motion in limine to preclude cumulative or bolstering expert wtiness testimony
Defendants’ motion in limine to exclude plaintiffs’ expert testimony
Defendants’ motion in limine to exclude evidence regarding funds not deposited into the NPS preneed trusts
Defendants’ motion in limine to preclude evidence, testimony and argument regarding notice to consumers and funeral homes not required by the trust agreements or Missouri law

Related

Sections

Mealey's Insurance Insolvency