Insurer Argues In Appeal Brief That Jury Verdict In Collapse Suit Was Correct
(October 13, 2015, 12:20 PM EDT) -- NEW YORK — An insurer argues in an Oct. 5 brief filed in the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that a jury verdict entered in favor of the insurer and against the homeowners who seek coverage for the collapse of their home should be upheld because the insureds failed to prove that the collapse of their home was caused by a named peril (Paul Fabozzi, et al. v. Lexington Insurance Co., No. 15-911, 2nd Cir.).