Mealey's (October 30, 2018, 1:55 PM EDT) -- BRIDGEPORT, Conn. — A number of excess insurers involved in an asbestos coverage dispute in Connecticut federal court on Oct. 26 filed objections to a motion for reconsideration, arguing that the motion should be denied because the insurer that is seeking reconsideration failed to present any new evidence warranting the reconsideration of the Connecticut federal judge’s summary judgment ruling (First State Insurance Co., et al. v. Ferguson Enterprises, et al., No. 16-1822, D. Conn.)....