Mealey's (July 25, 2018, 9:11 AM EDT) -- RICHMOND, Va.— An appellant recently asked the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to reverse a lower federal court’s finding that the sale of a vehicle anti-theft device that has a manufacturer warranty does not constitute the sale of insurance pursuant to West Virginia law, contending that the “Protection Plus Policy” was “manifestly insurance and not a warranty” and...