Mealey's (May 11, 2018, 12:44 PM EDT) -- SYRACUSE, N.Y. — Instead of addressing the admissibility of evidence in a dispute over the application of follow-the-fortunes clauses in reinsurance certificates for an asbestos settlement, an insurer argues in a May 8 opposition that a reinsurer’s “so-called ‘motion in limine’ is riddled with theories about the merits of the parties’ claims and defenses” (Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Munich Reinsurance America Inc., Nos. 12-00196 & 13-00743, N.D. N.Y.)....