Mealey's (April 30, 2018, 11:07 AM EDT) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. — In an April 26 decision, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals rejected a patent owner’s claim that it is entitled to a new trial because a defendant was improperly permitted to bypass a comparison of the patent and the accused product, instead allowing jurors to focus on similarities between the accused product and the defendant’s own prior art product (01 Communique Laboratory Inc. v. Citrix Systems Inc., No. 17-1869, Fed. Cir.)....