3rd Circuit: Protected Activity Must Be ‘But-For’ Cause For FCA Retaliation

Mealey's (January 11, 2018, 10:54 AM EST) -- PHILADELPHIA — A protected activity by an employee must be the “but-for” cause of an adverse action to prove retaliation under the False Claims Act (FCA), a Third Circuit U.S. Court...
To view the full article, register now.