Insured Did Not Comply With Policy’s Consent-To-Settle Provision, Appeals Panel Says

Mealey's (November 21, 2016, 1:26 PM EST) -- CINCINNATI — An excess liability insurer has no duty to reimburse an insured for underlying settlements related to defective knee implants because the policy’s consent-to-settle provision clearly required the insured to...
To view the full article, register now.