(October 31, 2016, 10:34 AM EDT) -- SALEM, Ore. — An expert was qualified to present a jury with general testimony about the concept of sexual grooming, an Oregon appeals panel ruled Oct. 26, also finding that the testimony did not constitute scientific evidence requiring a foundation under State v. Brown (297 Or 404, 687 P2d 751 [1984]) and State v. O’Key (321 Or 285, 899 P2d 663 [1995]) (State of Oregon v. Robert Lewis Henley aka Sonny Henley, No. 523, Ore. App.; 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1341)....