(October 27, 2016, 11:14 AM EDT) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. — An insurer argues in an Oct. 17 respondent opposition brief that the U.S. Supreme Court should not consider whether a district court may exclude expert testimony in a fraudulent transfer lawsuit based on flaws in the expert’s application of a reliable methodology (Symons International Group Inc., et al. v. Continental Casualty Co., No. 16-220, U.S. Sup.).

(Respondent opposition brief available.  Document #30-161111-018B.)

Continental Casualty Co. alleged that IGF Insurance Co. owed it more than $25 million for a crop-insurance business it bought in...