(August 30, 2016, 1:13 PM EDT) -- DETROIT — A Michigan federal judge on Aug. 26 excluded partial testimony in an insurance coverage dispute on the remaining issue as to whether an insured’s property was located within a 100-year floodplain at the time of its loss (Federal-Mogul Corp. v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, No. 12-12005, E.D. Mich.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114573).

(Opinion and order available. Document #30-160909-011Z.)

In 2011, Federal-Mogul Corp. said a flood caused substantial damage to its facility, located in Thailand. According to Federal-Mogul, it suffered a...