The Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have notified the U.S. Supreme Court and various federal district courts that the agencies have finalized a rule “establishing a durable definition of ‘waters of the United States’ (WOTUS),” a development that prompted Colorado to dismiss its lawsuit against the Trump administration’s version of the rule and one that the federal government hopes will influence a pending Supreme Court ruling attempting to define how the EPA enforces the Clean Water Act.
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A New Mexico appeals court panel has affirmed a trial court decision that a multicounty development was likely to impair existing water rights and that residents and entities that opposed a water allocation application were entitled to costs.
CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa — A U.S. Supreme Court special master has denied a motion by the United States to strike a proposed consent decree reached by Texas, New Mexico and Colorado on measuring the use of Rio Grande water and denied a motion by the federal government to keep the agreement under seal.
LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge denied a motion by four environmental groups to issue a temporary restraining order against a water district for allegedly “taking” fish through its operation of a dam and migrating fish ladder and denied their motion to remand their case to state court, noting that many of the issues are subject to the court’s continuing jurisdiction in a previous federal case.
LOS ANGELES — A California appeals court affirmed a trial court’s denial of a petition for a writ of administrative mandate in which an environmental group claimed that a city’s water projects violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The United States’ trust relationship with the Navajo Nation does not require the federal government to oversee the tribe’s right to use water from the Lower Colorado River, the Department of the Interior (DOI) says in its opening brief on the merits in the U.S. Supreme Court.
RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A Native American tribe and two water districts have asked a California federal judge to extend for three months his stay of their water rights case because they believe that private mediation can result in a settlement.
New developments in the following multiplaintiff, interstate or notable water rights cases are marked in boldface type.
MEDFORD, Ore. — An Oregon federal judge has granted a motion by Oregon to remand to state court a complaint that tribal water rights result in the uncompensated taking of a ranch’s property.
SALT LAKE CITY — The United States, the state of Utah and a Utah water district have filed briefs asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah to dismiss in whole or in part a lawsuit brought by a Native American tribe alleging a breach of duty to provide water and water rights since the creation of the reservation in the 1900s and through several water projects and water agreements.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California state trial court has denied petitions for writs of mandate contesting the legality of two amendments to the Delta Stewardship Council’s Delta Plan (the Delta Plan), repeatedly refuting allegations that the Delta Plan is an attempt to revive the controversial and now-abandoned WaterFix project.
DENVER — Six New Mexico residents are appealing to the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a federal court’s dismissal of their lawsuit seeking to counter a state court adjudication ruling involving Native American water rights in the state.
LOS ANGELES — The Second District California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s denial of a writ of mandate ordering an irrigation district to sell surplus water to an out-of-district user, saying the appellants failed to show that the district had an obligation to sell the water or that its refusal to do so was arbitrary and capricious.
SAN JOSE, Calif. — The Sixth District California Court of Appeal has reversed a trial court’s denial of motions by six water districts to recover attorney fees for their superior court challenge of the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) curtailment of water rights during a drought but affirmed denial of legal expenses for an administrative hearing preceding litigation in state court.
CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa — Texas, New Mexico and Colorado have asked a U.S. Supreme Court special master to enter a consent decree settling their water claims under the Rio Grande Compact and over the objection of the United States, which moved to strike the proposed agreement.
DENVER — The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a false claims lawsuit against a water district and other defendants, agreeing that the relator filed his action beyond the applicable 10-year statute of repose and that the lower court did not err in awarding defendants attorney fees and costs because the whistleblower lawsuit was vexatious and intended to harass the defendants.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) has issued an administrative civil liability complaint against the Shasta River Water Association for allegedly violating state drought restrictions and diverting water for irrigation and endangering fish.
SALEM, Ore. — The Oregon Court of Appeals has heard arguments on whether the Oregon Water Resources Commission and Oregon Water Resources Department erred when they denied a permit for a new dam after the project received was approved in a three-step process over six years.
New developments in the following multiplaintiff, interstate or notable water rights cases are marked in boldface type.
BOSIE, Idaho — The United States says an Idaho federal court should deny a motion by ranching interests to intervene in the federal government’s lawsuit against Idaho for the state’s attempt to legislatively rule that the government has forfeited its water rights, saying the intervenors have no protectable interest and are located at least 65 miles from any federal land at issue.