MIAMI — In an Aug. 21 verdict, a Florida jury rejected allegations that cigarettes manufactured and marketed by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. are responsible for the laryngeal cancer of a 25-year, two-pack-a-day smoker (Barbara Morales v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. 2007-016277-CA-01, Fla. Cir., 11th Jud. Cir., Dade Co.). VIDEO FROM THE TRIAL IS AVAILABLE.
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — In two verdicts rendered Aug. 27, a Florida jury awarded the son of a smoker $7.5 million, one year after a mistrial was declared in the case because of contradictory jury instructions (Michael Olson v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. 2008-CA-00396, Fla. 4th Jud. Cir., Duval Co.). VIDEO FROM THE TRIAL IS AVAILABLE.
NEW YORK — Deeming the Maryland appellate ruling in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v Stidham, 448 Md. 497, 141 A3d 1 (2016), instructive, a New York judge in an opinion posted Aug. 27 rejected efforts by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. to transfer smoking-related allegations by a lung cancer sufferer out of the New York City Asbestos Litigation (NYCAL) docket (Stephen Gabris v. 3M Company et al., No. 190259/2017, N.Y. Sup., New York Co., 2018 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3623).
ST. THOMAS, U.S. Virgin Islands — In what a public health research and advocacy nonprofit organization estimates are among the largest verdicts ever rendered in individual tobacco litigation, two juries empaneled in the U.S. Virgin Islands Superior Court in four separate verdicts issued in August ordered R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. to pay the children of two parents $113 million, including a $30 million punitive damage award rendered on Aug. 24 (Jevon Gerald v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., et al., No. ST-10-CV-631, U.S.V.I., Christian Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., et al., No. ST-10-CV-692, U.S.V.I. Super.).
SANTA FE, N.M. — A New Mexico federal judge overseeing multidistrict litigation over allegations that a cigarette manufacturer and its holding company misled consumers on Aug. 18 ordered the defendants to present a corporate representative for deposition, while also directing plaintiffs to comply with discovery requests in advance of defense depositions (In re: Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Marketing and Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 16-2695, D. Ariz., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140453).
GAINESVILLE, Fla. — A mistrial was declared in Phase 2 of an Engle progeny case on Aug. 17 by a Florida judge after jurors indicated that they were unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the amount of punitive damages to be awarded to the family of a smoker (Frances Bessent-Dixon v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. 2015-CA-002554, Fla. Cir., Alachua Co., 8th Jud. Dist.). VIDEO FROM THE TRIAL IS AVAILABLE.
HELENA, Mont. — Although conceding that a proposed ballot initiative regarding, among other increases, a $2 tax on cigarettes may contain a “mathematical misstatement,” the Montana Supreme Court on Aug. 15 refused to enjoin the state from putting the question to Montana voters this fall (Montanans Against Tax Hikes, et al. v. Corey Stapleton, Montana Secretary of State, et al., No. OP 18-0455, Mont. Sup., 2018 MT 201).
HONOLULU — A plaintiff previously deemed an “abusive litigant” in Hawaii federal court saw his latest efforts at litigating pro se — this time against Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. — thwarted Aug. 16 by a different Hawaii federal judge, who found that the proposed complaint “wholly lacks a cognizable legal theory” (Truman Lee Ketchmark v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, No. 18-79, D. Hawaii, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138767).
BROOKLYN, N.Y. — A defendant accused of violating a New York state law designed to set minimum cigarette prices won dismissal of the allegation on Aug. 3 by a New York justice, who found that offering rebates or other incentives to cigarette purchasers is not specifically prohibited by the statute (Amsterdam Tobacco Co. Inc., et al. v. Harold Levinson Associates LLC, No. 502413/18, N.Y. Sup., Kings Co., 2018 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3397).
SAN FRANCISCO — In what it deemed a case of first impression, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 12 affirmed a Washington federal judge’s determination that a tribal manufacturer of tobacco products located on land held in trust by the United States is not entitled to an exemption from the federal tobacco excise tax (United States v. King Mountain Tobacco Co., Nos. 14-36055 16-35607, 9th Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 22369).
SAN FRANCISCO — The same day it upheld a Washington federal judge’s determination that a tribal tobacco manufacturer owes the federal government $57.2 million in unpaid excise taxes, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 13 issued an unpublished ruling, which also affirmed a ruling by the same judge in a separate case that the government is owed $6.3 million for violations of a 2004 law known as the tobacco buyout (United States v. King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc., No. 16-35956, 9th Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 22400).
TAMPA, Fla. — In a July 25 complaint filed in the 13th Judicial Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Fla., a recently diagnosed lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patient took aim at R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Philip Morris USA Inc. and Liggett Group LLC, accusing the cigarette manufacturers of causing his illnesses (Joe Broughton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., et al., No. 18-CA-007187, Fla. Cir., Hillsborough Co., 13th Jud. Cir.).
MIAMI — In an Aug. 6 complaint filed in the 11th Judicial Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, a plaintiff took aim at R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Philip Morris USA Inc. and Publix Supermarkets Inc. in connection with the wrongful death of his wife, just two months after her lung cancer diagnosis (Walter Schnitzer, on behalf of the Estate of Deborah Schnitzer, v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. 2018-026537-CA-01, Fla. Cir., Miami-Dade Co., 11th Jud. Dist.).
OMAHA, Neb. — Efforts by the federal government to wade into a dispute between the Winnebago Tribe and Nebraska state officials over regulation of tribal cigarette sales were unsuccessful on Aug. 2, when a Nebraska federal magistrate judge rejected a motion by the U.S. Department of Justice to intervene in and stay the case based upon an ongoing criminal investigation of the tribe’s tobacco operations (HCI Distribution Inc., et al., v. Douglas Peterson, et al., No. 18, D. Neb.).
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — In an Aug. 6 response brief, Philip Morris USA Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. urge the Florida Supreme Court to turn away an appeal of a ruling that disqualified a law firm from providing legal representation for more than 100 Engle-progeny plaintiffs in Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal (David Canta and Corazon Canta v. Philip Morris USA Inc., et al., No. SC18-1104, Fla. Sup.).
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — In an Aug. 8 notice of supplemental authority, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. cited the Aug. 1 ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court in In re: Accutane Litigation, No. 2017 079958, N.J. Sup., 2018 N.J. LEXIS 988, as “pertinent” to the Florida Supreme Court’s continued consideration of a dispute over application of the Daubert standard in Florida (Richard DeLisle v. Crane Co., et al., No. SC16-2182, Fla. Sup.).
RICHMOND, Va. — A North Carolina federal judge abused his discretion in agreeing to reconsider a predecessor’s order that granted a petition to substitute the United States as a party defendant under the Westfall Act in a dispute stemming from undercover tobacco trafficking investigations led by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosions (ATF), the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Aug. 3 (U.S. Tobacco Cooperative Inc., et al. v. Big South Wholesale of Virginia LLC, et al., No. 17-2070, 4th Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 21574).
BALTIMORE — In a July 17 amicus brief in support of a July 10 motion for summary judgment by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and others, 11 nonprofit medical and research organizations — including the American Medical Association (AMA) — accused the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of unduly delaying its premarket review of newly deemed tobacco products, putting “a full generation of adolescents” at risk for “a lifetime of addiction” (American Academy of Pediatrics, et al. v. Food and Drug Administration, et al., No. 8:18-CV-883, D. Md.).
BOSTON — In an Aug. 2 holding, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a superior court judge did not err in finding that an insurer need not pay a $1.55 million legal malpractice settlement reached between an attorney and his former client whose case against the tobacco industry was not pursued within the three-year statute of limitations for a wrongful death action (Kenneth Perreault v. AIS Affinity Insurance Agency of New England Inc., et al., No. 17-P-1139, Mass. App., 2018 Mass. App. LEXIS 99).
ST. THOMAS, Virgin Islands — Efforts by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. to quash a subpoena issued pursuant to Rule 45 of the Virgin Islands Rules of Civil Procedure in underlying wrongful death litigation were unsuccessful July 24, when the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands refused the request (In re: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. 18-49, Virgin Islands, 2018 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 20).