Mealey's (March 25, 2019, 9:56 AM EDT) -- PHILADELPHIA — Although conceding that he made “two descriptive errors” in a February grant of summary judgment to R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (RJR) and others, a Pennsylvania federal judge on March 20 reaffirmed that his findings were nonetheless proper because a pro se plaintiff “adduced no more than a mere scintilla of evidence” that his alleged injuries were caused by smoking defective cigarettes (Ted A. McCracken v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., et al., No. 17-4495, E.D. Pa., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47137)....