CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A North Carolina federal bankruptcy court erred in finding that Chapter 11 debtors Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc. and Hanson Permanente Cement Inc. are not protected by the automatic stay from environmental cleanup cost state court settlement judgments, the debtors argue Feb. 4 in their opening appeal brief in federal court (Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., et al. v. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, No. 3:18-cv-507, W.D. N.C.).
BALTIMORE — The mayor and City Council of Baltimore on Feb. 19 sued Monsanto Co. and its subsidiaries in Maryland federal court, claiming that the companies are liable for contaminating stormwater and bodies of water in the state with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) (Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Monsanto Co., et al., No. 19-cv-00483, D. Md.).
PHILADELPHIA — A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Feb. 19 dismissed a lawsuit brought by two minor plaintiffs and an environmental group accusing President Donald Trump and other government officials of contributing to climate change by rolling back environmental regulations, holding that the plaintiffs cannot trace their alleged injuries to the defendants’ actions and that they failed to state claims upon which relief can be granted (Clean Air Council v. United States, et al., No. 17-4977, E.D. Pa., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25801).
PRESCOTT, Ariz. — A federal judge in Arizona on Feb. 19 ruled that an expert for a gas company seeking contribution and cost recovery under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act from the federal government, U.S. Department of the Interior, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the U.S. Geological Survey, the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the cleanup of 19 uranium mines on the Navajo Reservation can proffer testimony based on aerial photographs of the site, ruling that his methodology was reliable and that any challenges to the weight of his testimony can be challenged at trial (El Paso Natural Gas Co. LLC v. United States, No. CV-14-08165-PCT-DGC, D. Ariz., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26054).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 19 granted in part a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling that upheld a summary judgment award to five environmental groups that accused the county of Maui of violating the Clean Water Act (CWA) when discharging pollutants from its wells into the Pacific Ocean, but limited its review to whether the act requires a permit when pollutants originate from a point source but are conveyed to navigable waters by a nonpoint source, such as groundwater (County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al., No. 18-260, U.S. Sup.).
LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge on Feb. 6 refused to dismiss an insured’s declaratory judgment claim in an environmental contamination coverage dispute after determining that the insured has presented an actual controversy warranting the court’s jurisdiction over the claim (Whittaker Corp. v. AIG Specialty Insurance Co., No. 18-8453, C.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23744).
TACOMA, Wash. — A federal judge in Washington on Feb. 7 found that Union Pacific Railroad Co. was not liable under the Washington Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) for contamination at a former wood treatment site, holding that it was not an operator under the act and that the current owner of the property accepted responsibility for cleanup of the site through agreed orders with the Washington Department of Ecology (DOE) (Port of Ridgefield v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., No. CV14-6024RBL, W.D. Wash., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20229).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal claims court judge on Feb. 8 ruled that the court lacked jurisdiction over a suit brought by the current owner of a Superfund site in Pennsylvania against the federal government under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because the action was barred by the six-year statute of limitations (Whiteland Holdings L.P., et al. v. United States, No. 18-1081L, Fed. Clms., 2019 U.S. Claims LEXIS 56).
NEW ORLEANS — A furniture company’s request for damages under the Business and Economic Loss framework of the Deepwater Horizon Economic and Property Damages Settlement Agreement was upheld Feb. 8 by a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel that found that a federal judge in Louisiana did not err when denying review of the company’s claim because it was given ample opportunities to submit customer information (Claimant ID 100261758 v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., No. 18-30173, 5th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 3999).
NEW ORLEANS — A Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Feb. 8 ordered the federal judge in Louisiana presiding over the multidistrict litigation court for suits over damages caused by the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico that followed the April 20, 2010, explosion of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig to review an appeal brought by BP Exploration & Production Inc. over a finding that management fees paid by a claimant to its parent company are a fixed fee that should not be deducted from its variable income (BP Exploration & Production Inc. v. Claimant Id 100185315, No. 18-30331, 5th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 4007).
NEWARK, N.J. — A federal judge in New Jersey on Feb. 7 ordered a biodiesel fuel maker to pay $100,000 for one count of violating the Clean Water Act (CWA) and sentenced it to five years of probation after it pleaded guilty to discharging 45,000 gallons of wastewater into a waterway separating New Jersey from Staten Island, N.Y. (United States v. Fuel Bio One LLC, No. 18cr335, D. N.J.).
NEW ORLEANS — A Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Feb. 6 affirmed the denial of an Alabama vein clinic’s claim for business and economic loss under the Deepwater Horizon Economic and Property Damages Settlement Agreement, finding that the Court Supervised Settlement Program (CSSP) claims administrator did not err when finding that the clinic’s customer mix data did not support a showing that it lost revenue as a result of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico that followed the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in April 2010 (Claimant ID 100187576 v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., No. 18-30491, 5th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 3721)
LOS ANGELES — A federal judge in California on Feb. 4 entered final judgment in favor of defendants in a lawsuit over the remediation of contamination at the Omega Chemical Superfund site in California, finding that the plaintiffs’ requests for contribution and declaratory judgment under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) are barred by the statute of limitations (Arconic Inc., et al. v. APC Investment Co., et al., No. 14-6456, C.D. Calif., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17664).
NEW ORLEANS — A federal judge in Louisiana on Feb. 4 awarded summary judgment to BP Exploration & Production Inc. in a suit brought by a man who claimed exposure to dispersants during cleanup of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico following the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig caused him to develop chronic conjunctivitis, sinusitis and other injuries, finding that the plaintiff failed to present any evidence on medical causation (Melvin Banegas v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., No. 17-7429, E.D. La., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17353).
TACOMA, Wash. — A federal judge in Washington on Jan. 31 stayed a lawsuit brought by an environmental group against the owners of a landfill over discharges of storm water that allegedly violate the Clean Water Act so the defendant companies could work with the Washington Department of Ecology to resolve uncertainties about the companies’ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits (Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Pierce County Recycling, Composting & Disposal LLC, et al., No. C17-5731 BHS, W.D. Wash., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15736).
GREEN BAY, Wis. — P.H. Glatfelter Co. and Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP on Jan. 2 entered into a consent decree in Wisconsin federal court in which they agreed to expand their obligations under previous settlements concerning the cleanup of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and remediation of natural resource damages at the Lower Fox River and Green Bay Superfund site (United States v. NCR Corp., et al., No. 10cv910, E.D. Wis.).
NEW ORLEANS — A Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Feb. 1 upheld a federal judge in Louisiana’s decision to deny discretionary review of a Court Supervised Settlement Program (CSSP) administrator’s ruling that four claimants’ properties were not entitled to compensation as oiled properties under the Deepwater Horizon Economic and Property Damages Settlement Agreement, finding that the database for parcels of land, not the compensation category map, controls how a property is classified (Claimant ID 100297067 v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., No. 18-30748, 5th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 3089).
SHREVEPORT, La. — Sunoco Pipeline Co. and Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. on Jan. 30 entered into an agreement with the federal government and Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) in Louisiana federal court in which the companies agreed to pay $5.4 million to resolve Clean Water Act (CWA) violations stemming from oil spills in 2013, 2014 and 2015 in Texas, Louisiana,and Oklahoma (United States v. Sunoco Pipeline Co., et al., No. 19-cv-107, W.D. La.).
BINGHAMTON, N.Y. — A federal judge in New York on Jan. 29 recommended denying a man’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and dismissing his suit accusing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, its administrator and others of poisoning him and his dog through the use of pesticides, finding that he failed to sufficiently allege violations of the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Toxic Substances Control Act and Food Quality and Protection Act (David v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 19-cv-0064, N.D. N.Y., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14808).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal judge in the District of Columbia on Jan. 29 granted motions filed by the state of Oklahoma, two industry groups and a power company to intervene in a suit brought by three environmental groups challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s approval of the state’s rule regarding the storage of coal combustion residuals (CCRs), finding that intervention was warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) (Waterkeeper Alliance Inc., et al. v. Andrew Wheeler, et al., No. 18-2230, D. D.C., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14131).