CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 1 affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of primary and umbrella commercial liability insurers in a coverage dispute arising from underlying false advertising claims brough by Hawaii coffee growers against a coffee company insured, finding that there was no coverage triggered under the policies’ disparagement and slogan infringement provisions.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The day after the Motion Picture Association Inc. (MPA) filed an amicus curiae brief supporting a petition for certiorari by a group of music publishers, a coalition of three music industry associations teamed up on another amicus brief, urging the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify whether direct copyright liability rests solely on the individual that “presses the button” to make infringing copies of a copyrighted work or also on the party who directs or authorizes such infringing activity.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Presenting what they call “an obvious candidate” for certiorari, two music publishers ask the U.S. Supreme Court to provide guidance on whether the three-year statute of limitations period in the Copyright Act limits whether a plaintiff can seek damages under the discovery accrual rule for damages sustained more than three years before a complaint was filed.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — State law contractual claims brought by a song lyrics website operator against Google LLC are indistinguishable from federal copyright infringement claims and are, therefore, precluded by Section 301(a) of the Copyright Act, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) argues in an amicus curiae brief in which it recommends that the U.S. Supreme Court deny the company’s petition for certiorari in which it seeks clarification on application of the statute.
By Edward D. Lanquist and Dominic Rota
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In an amicus curiae brief, the U.S. solicitor general (SG), on behalf of the United States, recommends that the U.S. Supreme Court deny a petition for certiorari fled by Apple Inc. and Broadcom Inc., opining that the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals correctly found that the petitioners were estopped from pursuing patent invalidity claims because they did not raise them during inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, although they could have.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Affirming an inter partes review (IPR) ruling by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel majority found that Medtronic Inc. did not establish that catheter guide patents in suit are unpatentable, agreeing with the board’s rejection of asserted prior art and its conclusion that a broader intended purpose for the patents was consistent with expert and inventor testimony.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Vietnamese music app creator will have to face copyright infringement claims brought against it by a music distributor because the U.S. Supreme Court denied the company’s petition for certiorari in its May 30 order list, declining to weigh in on a question of when a website can confer jurisdiction over a foreign party.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A dispute over the eligibility of a patent pertaining to radio frequency identification (RFID) technology under Section 101 of the Patent Act will not be considered by the U.S. Supreme Court, which denied a petition for certiorari in its May 30 order list that asked the court to consider whether subdividing serial numbers served to make an invention patent-eligible subject matter.
CINCINNATI — A distributor of disposable e-cigarette products and several retailers on May 25 filed a notice of interlocutory appeal to the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals seeking to challenge a district court’s ruling preliminarily enjoining them from sales of vapes with a mark “remarkably similar” to a trademark-holder’s without requiring the trademark-holder to post a $1.8 million bond for their alleged future lost sales.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California federal judge denied a reptile exhibitor’s ex parte application for a temporary restraining order (TRO) barring a rival reptile show host from continuing to operate using a logo the applicant says violates its registered trademark, with the judge finding that the applicant waited too long after learning of the alleged violation to claim that it is at risk of irreparable harm.
NEW YORK — A Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed summary judgment for the operators of a gentlemen’s club that used images of models in social media posts without their permission, rejecting the models’ argument that the lower court “misstepped by treating recognizability as the ‘bottom line’ barometer for strength of mark in false endorsement claims” under the Lanham Act.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Two patent infringement suits that were previously before the U.S. Supreme Court in a dispute over the appointment of administrative patent judges (APJs) by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) were both denied certiorari on May 22 on another appointment matter, this one pertaining to temporary appointment of government officials when a PTO position is vacant per the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA).
AUSTIN, Texas — A federal magistrate judge in Texas recommended that a motion to dismiss trademark infringement allegations be denied in a dispute over the use of “ThrIVe” in connection with intravenous drip therapy.
ALEXANDRIA, Va. — Allegations by a bank that prior art renders obvious a patent relating to a remote check deposit system and method that enables quicker access to a check’s funds have been rejected by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
NEW YORK — Litigation in England will proceed before a New York court weighs in on a declaratory judgment action over releases purportedly signed by two individuals who now assert copyright ownership in sound recordings by the late Jimi Hendrix, a federal judge in New York has ruled.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Regents of the University of California have failed to persuade the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to undo a determination by the International Trade Commission (ITC) that myriad lighting retailers do not infringe two university patents.
SAN FRANCISCO — An injunction entered by a Nevada federal judge in a choreography copyright infringement action by two brothers who were replaced in the Cirque du Soleil by two sisters following the COVID-19 pandemic must be revisited, according to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court on May 18 affirmed trial court and circuit court rulings that two Amgen Inc. patents on anti-cholesterol antibodies are not sufficiently enabled because they seek to cover “potentially millions” of antigens that they do not claim.
ALEXANDRIA, Va. — In a preliminary patent owner response, Corrigent Corp. maintains that its patented system that determines bandwidth needs, maps logistical network topology to physical network topology and allocates the bandwidth accordingly should not be subjected to inter partes review (IPR) by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.