Mealey's (May 24, 2018, 10:56 AM EDT) -- SYRACUSE, N.Y. — In a dispute over whether a reinsurer is obligated to pay $3.2 million for an insurer’s defense expenses arising from an asbestos claims settlement, a New York federal judge on May 23 declined to reconsider an earlier finding of ambiguity in the reinsurance certificate provisions (Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Munich Reinsurance America Inc., Nos. 12-00196 & 13-00743, N.D. N.Y.)....