Alabama Federal Judge Says No Coverage Provided For Pollution Incident

(May 17, 2017, 1:15 PM EDT) -- MOBILE, Ala. — Because a third-party claimant seeking coverage for an environmental contamination lawsuit failed to prove that the environmental damages were unintended, no coverage is afforded under a policy’s subsection that provides coverage for unintended pollution incidents caused by transportation activities, an Alabama federal judge said May 15 (Heartland Catfish Co. Inc., et al. v. Navigators Specialty Insurance Co., No. 15-368, S.D. Ala., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73795)....

Attached Documents

Related Sections