NEW YORK — A receiver for an insolvent insurer in a Jan. 18 letter tells a New York federal judge to ignore a notice of appeal in a dispute over reinsurance payments for construction site injuries because the appeal was not filed by the insurer (Certain Underwriting Members of Lloyds of London, et al. v. Insurance Company of the Americas, Nos. 16-323 & 16-374, S.D. N.Y.).
NEW YORK — An insurer’s request for restitution against a landlord following the insolvency of the landlord’s insurer was denied Dec. 28 by a New York trial justice in a dispute over the settlement of a personal injury action (Jerusalem Avenue Taxpayer LLC, et al. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., et al., No. 159842/13, N.Y. Sup., New York Co., 2018 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 6664).
NEW YORK — A receiver for funds seeks redress in a Dec. 19 complaint filed in a New York federal court for a “massive fraudulent scheme masterminded by the now indicted and/or convicted insiders” of Platinum Partners Credit Opportunities Master Fund LP (PPCO funds) (Melanie L. Cyganowski, as equity receiver for Platinum Partners Credit Opportunities Master Fund LP, et al. v. Beechwood Re Ltd., et al., No. 18-12018, S.D. N.Y.).
SHREVEPORT, La. — A Louisiana appeals panel on Jan. 16 affirmed judgment in favor of Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association (LIGA) in a dispute over coverage under an insolvent insurer’s policy for a personal injury lawsuit (Mercedes Brown v. Affirmative Casualty Insurance Co., et al., No. 52,446-CA, La. App., 2nd Cir., 2019 La. App. LEXIS 69).
GRETNA, La. — Liability coverage was nonexistent for a vehicle involved in an automobile accident, the Fifth Circuit Louisiana Court of Appeal held Jan. 16, finding that summary judgment should have been granted to Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association (LIGA) (William Sanchez, et al. v. Holli Sigur, et al., No. 18-C-680, La. App., 5th Cir., 2019 La. App. LEXIS 83).
NEW YORK — An investor on Jan. 11 joined other motions seeking to dismiss a fraud and conspiracy lawsuit filed in a New York federal court by the liquidators for two hedge funds concerning allegations that the funds with a net asset value of nearly $1 billion turned out not only to be insolvent but also to have liabilities between $400 million and $800 million (Martin Trott, et al. v. Platinum Management [NY] LLC, et al., No. 18-10936, S.D. N.Y.).
NEW YORK — A New York appeals panel affirmed Jan. 10 that an ancillary receiver for Reliance Insurance Co. breached its duty to defend an insured in an underlying personal injury suit stemming from a nightclub shooting (In re Sean Combs v. Superintendent of Financial Services of the State of New York as Ancillary Receiver for Reliance Insurance Co., No. 405987/01, N.Y. Sup., App. Div., 1st Dept., 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 194).
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. — After finding that a judge erred in excluding expert testimony on an insurance agent’s standard of care regarding placed insurance with an insolvent insurer, a Tennessee appeals court panel on Jan. 9 vacated an entry of summary judgment to the agent on a professional negligence claim (Joy Littleton, et al. v. TIS Insurance Services Inc., No. E2018-00477-COA-R3-CV, Tenn. App., 2019 Tenn. App. LEXIS 13).
SAN FRANCISCO — In a dispute with Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar II on who is responsible for payment to insureds of workers’ compensation plans that become insolvent, the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) argues in a Jan. 8 reply brief to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that a lower court erred in dismissing claims based on preemption grounds and based on the government’s failure to timely file proofs of claims (California Insurance Guarantee Association v. Alex Azar II, et al., Nos. 17-56526 & 17-56528, 9th Cir.).
NEW YORK — In a dispute over the alleged mismanagement and misuse of $320 million, a run-off insurer’s second amended complaint should be dismissed, a reinsurer and its entities argue in a Jan. 7 motion in a New York federal court because the run-off insurer fails to sufficiently allege claims arising out of a breach of fiduciary duty and fraud (Senior Health Insurance Company of Pennsylvania v. Beechwood Re Ltd., et al., No. 18-6658, S.D. N.Y.).
SAN FRANCISCO — The California Supreme Court on Jan. 2 denied a petition filed by the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) to review a question on whether a medical care provider’s lien claim is a covered claim and whether subdivision (c)(9)(B) of California Insurance Code Section 1063.1 bars that claim (California Insurance Guarantee Association v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, et al., No. S252560, Calif. Sup., 2019 Cal. LEXIS 78).
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Elected leaders of the Pennsylvania General Assembly on Jan. 3 appealed a Pennsylvania federal judge’s ruling in favor of the Pennsylvania Professional Liability Joint Underwriting Association (JUA) that certain sections of Pennsylvania Act 41 are unconstitutional in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth and 14th Amendments (Pennsylvania Professional Liability Joint Underwriting Association v. Tom Wolf, et al., No. 18-1308, M.D. Pa.).
ST. LOUIS — Banks in a Jan. 2 motion seek to exclude an expert witness from offering rebuttal damages opinions in a Missouri federal court case filed by a special deputy receiver and state insurance guaranty associations over the mishandling of funds belonging to insolvent funeral insurers (Jo Ann Howard & Associates P.C., et al. v. J. Douglas Cassity, et al., No. 09-01252, E.D. Mo.).
NEW YORK — After a New York federal judge’s dismissal of tort and quasi-contract claims against a reinsurer and its entities, a run-off insurer filed a second amended complaint on Dec. 28 in its dispute over the alleged mismanagement and misuse of $320 million (Senior Health Insurance Company of Pennsylvania v. Beechwood Re Ltd., et al., No. 18-6658, S.D. N.Y.).
NEW YORK — A run-off insurer in a Dec. 15 motion seeks to add a fraudulent inducement claim regarding a $50 million investment against an individual defendant as well as civil conspiracy, aiding and abetting the breach of fiduciary duty and fraud claims to its New York federal court lawsuit against a reinsurer and its entities (Senior Health Insurance Company of Pennsylvania v. Beechwood Re Ltd., et al., No. 18-6658, S.D. N.Y.).
CONCORD, N.H. — The New Hampshire insurance commissioner on Dec. 3 sought approval of a settlement agreement reached with a reinsurer in a state trial court’s liquidation of The Home Insurance Co. (In the matter of the liquidation of The Home Insurance Co., No. 03-E-0106, N.H. Super., Merrimack Co.).
GREENSBORO, N.C. — On Dec. 17, a month after a North Carolina federal judge refused to dismiss a breach of contract lawsuit against an insurer regarding the return of collateral funds, the insurer and a staffing and personnel placement company announced a stipulation of dismissal (Debbie’s Staffing Services Inc. v. Highpoint Risk Services LLC, et al., No. 17-657, M.D. N.C.).
OKLAHOMA CITY — An insolvent insurer’s receiver told an Oklahoma federal judge on Dec. 18 that a settlement has been reached with reinsurance intermediaries over a claim of negligence in reinsurance services provided to the insurer (Oklahoma, et al. v. Axiom Re LP, et al., No. 17-484, Oklahoma, et al. v. Brown & Brown Insurance Inc., et al., No. 17-700, W.D. Okla.).
HARRISBURG, Pa. — A Pennsylvania federal judge on Dec. 18 entered judgment in favor of the Pennsylvania Professional Liability Joint Underwriting Association (JUA), declaring that Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Pennsylvania Act 41 are unconstitutional in violation of the Fifth and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution (Pennsylvania Professional Liability Joint Underwriting Association v. Tom Wolf, No. 18-1308, M.D. Pa., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212542).
NEWARK, N.J. — A New Jersey man filed a complaint on Dec. 7 in state court seeking uninsured motorists (UIM) and personal injury protection (PIP) benefits from the New Jersey Property Liability Insurance Guaranty Association (NJPLIGA) (Jose Risco v. De Andrade Filho, et al., No. ESX-L-008659-18, N.J. Super., Essex Co.).