DENVER — A 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Dec. 18 ruled that a federal district court did not err in granting an insurer’s summary judgment in an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit because the insurer had “an objectively reasonable basis to deny” its insured’s request for coverage for roof and interior damage after a wind storm (Billy Hamilton v. Northfield Insurance Co., Nos. 17-7049 and 17-7055, 10th Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 35393).
SCRANTON, Pa. — A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Dec. 12 ruled that an insured has failed to sufficiently plead her claim for statutory bad faith against her automobile insurance provider because the claim is “premised largely on bare-bones conclusory allegations which are not sufficient to state a bad faith claim” (Lauren Antidormi Moran v. United Services Automobile Association [USAA], No. 18-2085, M.D. Pa., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209315).
WILLIAMSPORT, Pa. — A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Dec. 17 ruled that an insured failed to sufficiently plead facts supporting her claim that her insurer acted in bad faith in failing to pay some medical benefits for claims made under her automobile insurance policy (Toni Leigh Phillips v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., No. 18-1672, M.D. Pa., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211729).
ATLANTA — A federal district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting that it erred in allowing certain evidence in an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit and granting a new trial in the action, an 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Dec. 14 (Joshua Moore v. GEICO General Insurance Co., No. 17-13655, 11th Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 35196).
NEW YORK — With a settlement pending between two insurers and Chapter 11 debtor Rapid-American Corp. over asbestos insurance coverage, the debtor tells a New York federal bankruptcy judge in a Dec. 13 filing that allowing summary judgment motions on two issues will go a long way toward resolving the rest of the case against the only remaining insurer defendant (Rapid-American Corporation, et al. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, et al., No. 15-01095, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).
SEATTLE — In a dispute over coverage for construction defects to a mixed-use condominium building, a Washington appeals panel on Dec. 10 reversed dismissal of an additional insured’s duty to defend and bad faith claims against one commercial general liability insurer but affirmed dismissal of the same claims against two other CGL insurers (Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Ledcor Industries [USA] Inc., et al., No. 76405-5-I, Wash. App., Div. 1, 2018 Wash. App. LEXIS 2769).
LOS ANGELES — A federal judge in California on Nov. 29 remanded an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit to state court, ruling that an insured’s state law claims do not arise under the Medicare Act and that the insured failed to show that federal question jurisdiction exists (Rosalie Vaccarino v. Aetna Inc., et al., No. 18-2349, C.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202672).
DENVER — In an original proceeding pursuant to state appellate rules, the Colorado Supreme Court on Nov. 5 ruled that a state trial court’s order in an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit requiring an insured to undergo an independent medical examination (IME) at the request of her insurer was in error because the insurer’s alleged bad faith “must be evaluated based on the evidence before it” (Charissa Schultz v. GEICO Casualty Co., No. 18SA135, Colo. Sup., 2018 Colo. LEXIS 904).
HARTFORD, Conn. — A Connecticut judge on Nov. 7 ruled that although an insured failed to sufficiently plead claims for insurance bad faith and violations of Connecticut’s unfair trade practices and unfair insurance practices laws, he has sufficiently alleged facts supporting his claims for breach of contract against his automobile insurance provider (Alan Robinshaw v. Foremost Insurance Co., No. HHDCV176082231S, Conn. Super., Hartford Dist., 2018 Conn. Super. LEXIS 3792).
ST. LOUIS — The Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Dec. 6 affirmed a lower federal court’s ruling in favor of an insurer in a breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit seeking coverage for an underlying lawsuit alleging violation of a noncompetition covenant (Robert Mau, et al. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co., No. 17-3392, 8th Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 34358).
CHICAGO — An insured adequately alleged facts in support of a breach of contract claim against a disability insurer but failed to support a claim that the insurer acted vexatiously and unreasonably in refusing to renew the insured’s disability policies, an Illinois federal judge said Nov. 21 (Donald Astar v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co., No. 18-4895, N.D. Ill., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198434).
OKLAHOMA CITY — A federal judge in Oklahoma granted in part an insurer’s summary judgment motion in an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit on Nov. 14, ruling that although certain of an insured’s bad faith claims are time-barred or subject to a “legitimate dispute” over the scope of the insurance policy in question, genuine issues of material fact exist that prohibit summary judgment on the breach of contract claim (Rebecca L. Ake v. Central United Life Insurance Co., No. 17-937, W.D. Okla., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194042).
NEW YORK — In affirming the dismissal of breach of contract and bad faith claims, the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Dec. 6 agreed with a lower judge that an insurer’s settlement of a flood damage claim arising out of construction work and its reimbursement under a captive reinsurance agreement did not breach its contract to insureds (Keller Foundations LLC, et al. v. Zurich American Insurance Co., No. 18-1280, 2nd Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 34345).
LOS ANGELES — No coverage is owed for a judgment entered against an insured for breach of warranty of habitability claims alleged by the insured’s tenants because the insured failed to comply with the policy’s condition that required working smoke detectors in the insured building, the Second District California Court of Appeal said Dec. 3 in affirming the trial court’s decision to sustain the insurer’s demurrer to the tenants’ breach of contract and bad faith complaint (Debra Gray v. American Safety Indemnity Co., No. B289323, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 4, 2018 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 8160).
ST. LOUIS — A Missouri federal judge on Dec. 3 dismissed a disability claimant’s breach of contract and bad faith claims after determining that the short-term disability (STD) plan under which the claimant seeks benefits did not constitute a contract between the claimant and the employer (Anne C. Hart v. Ascension Health Alliance, No. 18-1548, E.D. Mo., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203974).
SAN FRANCISCO — A disability claimant cannot maintain claims for breach of contract and bad faith based on a 2013 denial of benefits because the applicable statute of limitations for breach of contract and bad faith allegations bars the claims, a California federal judge said Dec. 4 (Theresa Hong v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance Co., No. 18-4039, N.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205336).
LOS ANGELES — Judgment in favor of an auto insurer on an insured’s bad faith claim was proper because the insurer promptly paid the insured’s claim after learning how much of the insured’s medical expenses would be covered by workers’ compensation insurance, the Second District California Court of Appeal said Nov. 21 (Melissa Case v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. No. B281732, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 4, 2018 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 7887).
RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals is free to consider an appeal in a declaratory judgment action even while a consolidated bad faith portion of the case remains pending, the parties tell the court in supplemental briefing on the impact of recent Supreme Court precedent. Oral arguments in the cases are scheduled for Dec. 11 (Founders Insurance Co. v. Richard Ruth’s Bar & Grill LLC, et al., George Giannaras, et al. v. Founders Insurance Co., et al., No. 17-1282(L), 17-1284, 17-1344, 17-1348, 4th Cir.).
SYRACUSE, N.Y. — An insured’s bad faith claim arising out of a coverage dispute regarding the administration of an employee retirement fund cannot stand because the insured does not allege a violation of a duty independent of the insurance contract as required under New York law, a New York federal judge said Nov. 30 (Young Men’s Christian Association of Plattsburgh v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co., No. 18-565, N.D. N.Y., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202818).
PHILADELPHIA — A Pennsylvania federal judge on Nov. 28 refused to sever and stay a bad faith claim filed against an auto insurer after determining that severing the claim would not serve the interests of convenience, economy or expedition (Gilbert Goldstein, et al. v. American States Insurance Co., d/b/a Safeco Insurance Co., No. 18-3163, E.D. Pa., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201100).