Mealey's Health Care / ACA

  • April 26, 2018

    New Jersey Court Upholds Caps On Chiropractor Reimbursements

    TRENTON, N.J. — A New Jersey agency’s cap on payments for out-of-network chiropractic care violates neither the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) nor state law barring discrimination against health care providers, and state law provided the agency full authority to enact the measure, a state appellate court held April 25 (Association of New Jersey Chiropractors Inc., et al. v. State Health Benefits Commission, et al., No. A-5653-14T1, N.J. Super., App. Div.).

  • April 26, 2018

    New Jersey Court Upholds Caps On Chiropractor Reimbursements

    TRENTON, N.J. — A New Jersey agency’s cap on payments for out-of-network chiropractic care violates neither the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) nor state law barring discrimination against health care providers, and state law provided the agency full authority to enact the measure, a state appellate court held April 25 (Association of New Jersey Chiropractors Inc., et al. v. State Health Benefits Commission, et al., No. A-5653-14T1, N.J. Super., App. Div.).

  • April 25, 2018

    Religious Group May Intervene In Pennsylvania ACA Rules Case, 3rd Circuit Says

    PHILADELPHIA — A religious group may intervene in Pennsylvania’s action challenging October 2017 rules expanding moral and religious exemptions from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive mandate, the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held April 24 (Pennsylvania v. President of the United States, et al., No. 17-3679, 3rd Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 10312).

  • April 24, 2018

    Dispute Over Kentucky Medicaid Work Requirements Will Stay In D.C. Court

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In an April 10 ruling, a District of Columbia federal judge rejected efforts by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and other defendants to transfer a dispute over the new Kentucky Medicaid program to the Eastern District of Kentucky, deeming the case a matter of “national significance” (Ronnie Maurice Stewart, et al., v. Alex M. Azar II, et al., No. 18-152, D. D.C., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60477).

  • April 24, 2018

    Supreme Court Seeks Response To Hospitals’ Medicare Exhaustion Petition

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on April 24 asked an insurer to respond to out-of-network hospitals’ petition for writ of certiorari challenging whether administrative exhaustion is required in payment disputes between health care providers and Medicare Advantage Organizations (Atlanta Medical Center Inc., et al. v. Care Improvement Plus South Central Insurance Co., No. 17-1283, U.S. Sup.).

  • April 20, 2018

    Judge Certifies Class Of ACA Cost-Reduction Payment Plaintiffs

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal claims judge on April 17 certified a class action involving insurers’ claims that the federal government failed to make timely payments under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) cost-reduction program (Common Ground Healthcare Cooperative v. The United States, No. 17-877C, Fed. Clms., 2018 U.S. Claims LEXIS 317).

  • April 20, 2018

    Federal Judge Again Finds Home Infusion Pharmacy’s Suit Untimely

    LOS ANGELES — The statute of limitations on a home infusion pharmacy’s breach of contract claims began when an insurer made initial, incomplete payment, a federal judge in California said April 17 in granting reconsideration while remaining convinced that the suit was time-barred (IV Solutions Inc. v. Empire Healthchoice Assurance Inc., et al., No. 17-5615, C.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64671).

  • April 20, 2018

    Federal Judge Dismisses Surgery Provider’s ERISA, New Jersey Law Claims

    TRENTON, N.J. — ERISA preempts a state law that in any case lacks a private right of action, and failure to allege exhaustion of administrative remedies and a contract’s anti-assignment provision doom the remainder of a health care provider’s suit seeking reimbursement from an insurer, a federal judge in New Jersey held April 17 (Luis Zapiach, M.D. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield, No. 17-10179, D. N.J., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64887).

  • April 19, 2018

    Amicus Parties Urge 9th Circuit To Reject ACA Rules Challenge

    SAN FRANCISCO — Updated rules providing more exemptions from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive mandate merely corrected unfair discrimination and disparate treatment in the initial rules that ran into constitutional issues, two amicus curiae parties told the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on April 16 in urging them to reject a challenge to the rules brought by a group of states challenge to those rules (California, et al. v. Alex M. Azar II, et al., Nos. 18-15144, 18-15166, 18-15255, 9th Cir.).

  • April 18, 2018

    Judge: Providing Medical Care To Insureds Doesn’t Confer Benefit On Insurer

    MIAMI — Providing insureds with medical services does not sufficiently confer a benefit on an insurer to support an unjust enrichment claim under Florida law, a federal judge in the state held April 13 (John C. Nordt III, et al. v. Colina Insurance Limited, No. 17-21226, S.D. Fla.).

  • April 18, 2018

    Maryland Seeks Creation Of Reinsurance Program For ACA Exchange

    BALTIMORE — The board governing Maryland’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchange on April 16 voted to seek federal funding for a reinsurance program it hopes will save its struggling marketplace.

  • April 17, 2018

    Judge: Failure To Exhaust Administrative Remedies Dooms Health Care Case

    TRENTON, N.J. — A woman must exhaust available administrative remedies before filing an Employee Retirement Income Security Act suit if her health care policy does not mandate an appeals process and should further specify the provisions, procedures and costs involved, a federal judge in New Jersey held April 12 (Charlene Lemoine v. Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield, et al., No. 16-6786, D. N.J., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62535).

  • April 16, 2018

    Residential Treatment Exclusion Violates Federal Mental Health Law, Judge Says

    NEW YORK — A man granted summary judgment on claims that his insurer violated federal law in denying health insurance coverage for his son’s mental health services filed a sealed brief on April 9 detailing the appropriate remedies.  A federal judge in New York ordered the briefing after concluding that the insurer violated the law by excluding coverage for residential treatment facilities and that the issue was further complicated by exclusions for out-of-network care (Kevin Munnelly v. Fordham University Faculty and Administration HMO Insurance Plan, et al., No. 16-5632, S.D. N.Y.).

  • April 16, 2018

    Surgery Center Has Liability For Subagent’s Conduct With Insurer, Judge Says

    LOS ANGELES — A bariatric surgery center likely knew that a bariatric surgeon relied on a subagent to receive insurance preauthorization for procedures and can therefore be liable for allegedly fraudulent representations, a federal judge in California held April 11 (Soma Surgery Center Inc. v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., et al., No. 16-5802, C.D. Calif.).

  • April 13, 2018

    Addiction Center Seeks Sanction For Ignoring Subpoena In Health Insurance Case

    MIAMI — A drug treatment and urinalysis facility on April 12 asked a federal judge in Florida for sanctions and an order compelling production of documents from a second addiction treatment facility’s former medical director, saying failure to comply with a subpoena warranted the relief.  The judge dismissed the center’s ERISA and state law claims just days before, saying the allegations lacked sufficient specificity to determine contract details (Living Tree Laboratories LLC v. United Healthcare Services Inc., et al. v. A New Start Inc., et al., No. 16-24680, S.D. Fla.).

  • April 13, 2018

    Court: Health Care Provider’s Contract Claim Not Subject To Government Immunity

    FORT WORTH, Texas — Governmental immunity does not shield a hospital from a health care provider’s breach of contract claim involving bills incurred while treating the son of one of the hospital’s employees, a Texas appeals court held April 5 (Cook Children’s Health Care System, et al. v. Nocona General Hospital, No. 02-17-00128-CV, Texas App., 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 2439).

  • April 13, 2018

    Federal Judge Dismisses Insolvent Health Insurer’s Suit Against United States

    LAS VEGAS — A Nevada federal judge on March 30 dismissed a defunct health insurer’s case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the monetary relief sought against the United States is available through the Court of Federal Claims (Barbara D. Richardson v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al., No. 17-775, D. Nev., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54065).

  • April 12, 2018

    Intervenors Tell 9th Circuit Standing Lacking In ACA Birth Control Rules Case

    SAN FRANCISCO — California and other states lack standing to challenge interim final rules expanding the scope of religious and moral exclusions to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive mandate, two intervenors in the case tell the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal in April 9 briefs (California, et al. v. Alex M. Azar II, et al., Nos. 18-15144, 18-15166, 18-15255, 9th Cir.).

  • April 11, 2018

    Suit Alleging Stalled Health Insurance Claims Proceeds, Won’t Be Bifurcated

    MIAMI — A federal judge in Florida on April 10 declined to bifurcate an Employee Retirement Income Security Act dispute involving more than 100,000 allegedly unprocessed claims worth more than $1 million, saying such a trial procedure is unnecessary in light of how much the evidence overlaps.  On April 4, he largely allowed the claims to proceed, saying exhaustion of administrative remedies is not warranted given the allegations that the insurer breached its regulatory duties and that requiring more precise pleading as to the claims in question would not clarify the case (National Laboratories LLC, et al. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al., No. 17-81178, S.D. Fla.).

  • April 10, 2018

    Insurer, Class Battle Over Scope Of Discovery In ACA Lactation Coverage Case

    DES MOINES, Iowa — A magistrate judge improperly limited discovery in a case challenging a health insurer’s cost-sharing arrangement for lactation consultant services, plaintiffs told a federal judge in Iowa March 12.  But the insurer fired back March 26, saying the ruling properly limits discovery to the lone remaining issue:  whether the in-network coverage complies with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (Jillian York, et al. v. Wellmark Inc., et al., No. 16-627, S.D. Iowa).