(March 8, 2017, 2:41 PM EST) -- CONCORD, N.H. — A man’s belief that he suffered from a heart condition rather than heart disease and his unsubstantiated claims that he disclosed as much to his insurer does not save his action challenging its denial of benefits or rescission of coverage under a pre-existing condition clause, a federal judge in New Hampshire held March 3 in granting summary judgment on the insurer’s counterclaims (Warren Wallis v. HCC Life Insurance Co., No. 15-525, D. N.H., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30360)....