(July 3, 2018, 12:10 PM EDT) -- ANNAPOLIS, Md. — The Maryland Court of Special Appeals on June 28 affirmed a lower court’s ruling that insurers have a duty to defend a restaurant owner insured against underlying claims that it invaded women’s rights of private occupancy of a restroom when its manager conducted unauthorized video surveillance, but found that the lower court erred in not concluding that the criminal acts exclusion bars coverage for the claims against the manager (Harleysville Preferred Insurance Company, et al. v. Rams Head Savage Mill LLC, et al., No. 2409, September Term, 2016, Md. Spec. App., 2018 Md. App. LEXIS 625)....