LANCASTER, Pa. — The attorney for the estate of a deceased nursing home resident on Feb. 18 petitioned a Pennsylvania court to distribute a $200,000 settlement in a nursing home wrongful death and survival case.
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — A Florida federal magistrate judge sided with the federal government on Feb. 12, upholding in a report and recommendation a Medicare Appeals Council’s ruling that a Medicare beneficiary who settled his medical malpractice claim against a hospital for $1 million was obligated to repay Medicare more than $75,000 in medical expenses.
JACKSON, Miss. — Affidavits attesting to the validity of purported holographic and typed wills created a genuine issue of material fact regarding the validity of those wills, even if the affidavits’ signatory may have been married to a beneficiary of those wills at the time of the wills’ signing and was a subscribing witness to the wills, the Mississippi Court of Appeals held Feb. 9 in reversing summary judgment in favor of the objector to the wills.
DES MOINES, Iowa — The Iowa Supreme Court on Feb. 19 found that the state Probate Code does not permit prospective heirs to contest the validity of a will of a testator who is still living, affirming a lower court’s decision not to adjudicate the validity of two wills executed by a man while he was in a voluntary conservatorship (In re Guardianship and Conservatorship of Vernon D. Radda [Kevin Kiene, et al. v. Washington State Bank], No. 19–2088, Iowa Sup., 2021 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 11).
DES MOINES, Iowa — The Iowa Supreme Court on Feb. 19 found that the state Probate Code does not permit prospective heirs to contest the validity of a will of a testator who is still living, affirming a lower court’s decision not to adjudicate the validity of two wills executed by a man while he was in a voluntary conservatorship.
PHILADELPHIA — A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Feb. 5 granted in part a motion to dismiss filed by Kindred Healthcare Inc. and a number of its subsidiaries, finding that a relator in a False Claims Act (FCA) lawsuit failed to sufficiently allege that they misrepresented their compliance with staffing requirements to receive larger reimbursements from Medicare and Medicaid and that they inappropriately used government funding received from the insurers.
PHILADELPHIA — A federal judge in Pennsylvania did not err in granting summary judgment to two physicians who contracted with a nursing home to care for its residents, in refusing to issue two jury instructions proposed by the estate of a former resident who asserted civil rights violations or in limiting the testimony of the estate’s expert witness, a Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Feb. 22 in a nonprecedential opinion.
ATLANTA — A federal district court’s finding that a principal had the mental capacity to enter into a power of attorney was not “clearly erroneous,” and the court properly applied Georgia state law in determining the beneficiary of a life insurance policy in an interpleader action, the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed Feb. 12.
LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel on Feb. 18 reversed a more than $31 million judgment for an employee on her claims of age-based harassment and discrimination due to prejudicial error by the trial court when it excluded some of the employer’s evidence during the liability phase.
WICHITA, Kan. — A Kansas federal magistrate judge on Feb. 16 denied a disability claimant’s motion to conduct discovery after determining that the claimant failed to show that any exceptional circumstances exist that would warrant extra-record discovery.
CONCORD, N.H. — The New Hampshire Supreme Court on Feb. 17 held that amended regulations that retroactively limited rate increases for long-term care insurance (LTCI) policies exceeded the New Hampshire Insurance commissioner's mandate “because they are not reasonable rules that either promote premium adequacy or protect policyholders in the event of substantial rate increases” and, therefore, are invalid, reversing and remanding a lower court’s ruling on a life insurer’s ultra vires claim against the New Hampshire Department of Insurance.
ATLANTA— A federal judge in Georgia on Feb. 10 denied dismissal of a False Claims Act (FCA) lawsuit filed by a former account manager against a local pharmacy services supplier over an alleged kickback scheme between the company and nursing homes, finding that the relator’s amended complaint sufficiently alleged that the provider offered remuneration to assisted living communities (ALCs) that made the defendant company a preferred pharmacy and that the relationship between the parties resulted in the submission of fraudulent claims to insurers.
ST. PAUL, Minn. — A trial court abused its discretion in granting a harassment restraining order (HRO) against a man on behalf of a woman in a care facility without considering the Minnesota bill of rights for individuals under guardianship, a Minnesota appeals court concluded Jan. 25, in reversing and remanding the order. It also held that there was insufficient evidence to support the HRO obtained by the woman’s daughter.
SANTA ANA, Calif. — Finding that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act completely preempts state law claims stemming from a senior living facility resident’s COVID-19-related death and immunizes the facility from liability, a federal judge in California on Feb. 10 denied the family’s motion to remand and granted the facility’s motion to dismiss.
PHILADELPHIA — A federal judge in New Jersey erred in finding that the operators of two rehabilitation facilities where at least 50 patients have died from COVID-19 were not acting at the direction of a federal agency or operator and in concluding that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act did not completely preempt state law claims against them, the operators tell the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a Feb. 8 brief urging the court to reverse the lower court’s order remanding two putative negligence and wrongful death class actions to state court.
ELGIN, Ill.— An Illinois appeals court panel on Feb. 1 ordered a new trial in an action to determine whether a woman’s marriage to a now-deceased man who was subject to a guardianship at the time of the event was valid, thus making her his heir, finding that the trial court judge erred when ruling that the woman could not testify under the Dead Man’s Act.
FRANKFORT, Ky. — Because Kentucky’s grandparent visitation statute does not address issues raised in an action brought by a paternal grandfather to continue visiting his granddaughter, who had been adopted by her maternal grandmother, the Kentucky Supreme Court applied a statutory stepparent exception to the case. The state high court on Jan. 21 reversed and remanded to the family court to determine whether visitation was in the child’s best interest.
BOSTON — The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on Feb. 9 reversed a decision by the state’s Medicaid program, known as MassHealth, that a woman was ineligible for long-term care benefits from Medicaid, finding that her creation of a nominee trust did not make her property a countable asset.
SAN FRANCISCO — Appellants recently asked the California Supreme Court to clarify the application of California Insurance Code Sections 10113.71 and 10113.72 “consistent with their plain language and remedial purpose” and direct an appeals court to confirm the application of these statutes to a $1 million life insurance policy, arguing that the appeals court’s opinion “leaves vulnerable” senior and disabled policyholders that the statutes intended to protect.
DETROIT — A federal judge in Michigan on Feb. 9 signed a consent decree reached between the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and a Michigan company under which the employer will pay $60,000 to end claims that it refused to hire a job applicant due to his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).