We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Mealey's Discovery

  • August 16, 2018

    Judge Rules On Motion To Quash Subpoena In Insolvent Funeral Insurers’ Dispute

    ST. LOUIS — A Missouri federal judge on Aug. 14 granted in part and denied in part a request to quash a subpoena against a nonparty to provide documents in a dispute over the mishandling of funds belonging to insolvent funeral insurers (Jo Ann Howard & Associates P.C., et al. v. J. Douglas Cassity, et al., No. 09-01252, E.D. Mo., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137013).

  • August 15, 2018

    Panel: Jurisdiction Lacking In Journalist’s Case To Unseal Asbestos Document

    HOUSTON — A Texas appeals panel on Aug. 14 affirmed a trial court’s ruling and held that an investigative journalist’s lawsuit seeking to unseal a deposition in an asbestos case was properly dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the plenary power of the trial court had expired and the document itself was not an official court record (Christine Cole Biederman v. Beverly Jean Brown, et al., No. 01-07-00263-CV, Texas App., 1st Dist.; 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 6338).

  • August 15, 2018

    Opioid MDL Plaintiffs Get Partial Access To McKesson Internal Investigation

    CLEVELAND — A special master in the opioid multidistrict litigation on Aug. 1 said plaintiffs can see the names of 46 employees of distributor defendant McKesson Corp. who were interviewed as part of an internal stockholder investigation but said other material is protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege (In Re:  National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2804, No. 17-md-2804, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Div.).

  • August 10, 2018

    Tribal Lending Company Avoids Subpoena Through Sovereign Immunity

    ALEXANDRIA, La. — A lending company owned by a Louisiana Indian tribe is protected by the tribe’s sovereign immunity from a subpoena served by another loan company battling predatory lending practice allegations leveled by Pennsylvania, a federal magistrate judge held Aug. 8 in quashing the subpoena (Pennsylvania v. Think Finance, Inc., et al., No. 1:18-mc-0024, W.D. La., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133990).

  • August 9, 2018

    3rd Circuit Reverses Quash Of Discovery Subpoena In Bone Cement Trade Secret Case

    PHILADELPHIA — Finding that a trial court failed to properly apply the standards for obtaining a subpoena to obtain discovery for use in a foreign trade secret lawsuit, a Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Aug. 6 vacated the quash of the subpoena and remanded for reconsideration in light of the facts of the underlying German lawsuit (In re:  Application of Biomet Orthopaedics Switzerland GmbH under 28 U.S.C. 1782 for an order to take discovery for use in a foreign proceeding, No. 17-3787, 3rd Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 21684).

  • August 9, 2018

    DOJ, FBI Must Provide Discovery In Defamation Suit Over Buzzfeed Article

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Information sought by Buzzfeed from several governmental entities is relevant to its defense in an underlying defamation lawsuit over an article on purported Russian attempts to hack the Democratic National Committee (DNC) database, a District of Columbia federal judge ruled Aug. 3, also deeming the requested discovery to be not privileged or burdensome (Buzzfeed Inc., et al. v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al., No. 1:17-mc-02429, D. D.C., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130480).

  • August 8, 2018

    Insolvent Funeral Insurers Give Notice Of New Info Relevant To Motion To Quash

    ST. LOUIS — In a dispute over the mishandling of funds belonging to insolvent funeral insurers, a receiver and state insurance guaranty associations provided notice on Aug. 7 to a Missouri federal court of new information relevant to a motion to quash a subpoena to testify (Jo Ann Howard & Associates P.C., et al. v. J. Douglas Cassity, et al., No. 09-01252, E.D. Mo.).

  • August 8, 2018

    Judge Won’t Compel Disclosure Of DHS, DOJ Anti-Terrorism Documents In FOIA Dispute

    NEW YORK — A New York federal judge on Aug. 3 found that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) properly withheld documents related to an anti-extremist program in response to an organization’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, finding that the withheld materials were exempt from disclosure under national security and other statutory exemptions (Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law v. Department of Homeland Security, et al., No. 1:16-cv-00672, S.D. N.Y., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130918).

  • August 7, 2018

    Employee Log-In/Log-Out Records Must Be Produced In Employment Class Action

    RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A California federal magistrate judge on July 26 ordered a defendant in an employment class action to turn over log-in/log-out records to the plaintiff and to make good on its promise to turn over job descriptions (Gabriela Ortolani v. Freedom Mortgage Corp., No. 17-1462, C.D. Calif., Eastern Div., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125522).

  • August 2, 2018

    Nonparty Seeks To Quash Documents Requested By Insolvent Funeral Insurers

    ST. LOUIS — A nonparty to a dispute over the mishandling of funds belonging to insolvent funeral insurers argues in a July 30 reply brief that a Missouri federal court should quash documents requested by the insurers’ receiver that were previously settled (Jo Ann Howard & Associates P.C., et al. v. J. Douglas Cassity, et al., No. 09-01252, E.D. Mo.).

  • August 2, 2018

    Magistrate Denies Attorney-Client, Work Product Privileges, Won’t Quash Subpoena

    MILWAUKEE — A Wisconsin federal magistrate judge on July 30 denied a motion to quash a subpoena in an employment discrimination lawsuit, finding insufficient proof that the information sought was attorney work product or privileged communications (Natalie Anderson v. SoftwareONE, Inc., No. 16-1181, E.D. Wis., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126812).

  • July 31, 2018

    COMMENTARY: “Hard” Tools For Controlling Discovery Burdens In Arbitration

    By Steven C. Bennett

  • July 31, 2018

    Opioid MDL Judge Blocks News Media Access To Drug Database Discovery

    CLEVELAND — Two newspapers cannot access federal prescription drug tracking data produced in the opioid multidistrict litigation, an Ohio federal judge ruled July 26 (In Re:  National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2804, No. 17-md-2804, N.D. Ohio, E. Div.).

  • July 30, 2018

    Lead Plaintiffs Lack Standing, But Jurisdictional Discovery Permitted

    NEWARK, N.J. — A federal judge in New Jersey on July 27 ruled that certain lead plaintiffs in a securities class action lawsuit against a pharmaceutical company, certain of its senior executives and underwriters of its initial public offering (IPO) failed to show that they have standing to assert their claims against the defendants but denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the claims against them to allow the challenged plaintiffs to conduct jurisdictional discovery on the issue (Robin J. Dartell, et al. v. Tibet Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al., No. 14-3620, D. N.J., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125643).

  • July 30, 2018

    Builder Ordered To Produce Documents About Sales Of Homes With Defective Joists

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — A builder of custom homes on July 27 was ordered by a federal magistrate judge in Ohio to produce four categories of documents regarding sales of homes that were built with joists that contained a flame retardant that allegedly emits levels of formaldehyde that renders homes uninhabitable because the information is relevant to a plaintiff couple’s claims that homes with the joists suffer from a diminution in value (Jamal Coleman, et al. v. Westport Homes Inc., No. 18-mc-31, S.D. Ohio, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125702).

  • July 30, 2018

    Insurer Ordered To Answer Litigation Hold Questions In Testosterone MDL

    CHICAGO — Health insurer Medical Mutual of Ohio (MMO) on July 27 was ordered to provide specific answers to testosterone replacement therapy drug makers relating to when the insurer told employees to hold discovery related data in litigation involving alleged wrongful promotion of testosterone therapy drugs (In Re: Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2545, No. 14-1748, Medical Mutual of Ohio v. AbbVie, Inc., No. 14-8857, N.D. Ill., Eastern Div.).

  • July 30, 2018

    Magistrate Judge Compels Discovery Of Workers’ Compensation Information

    LINCOLN, Neb. — In a dispute over the breach of the promissory note executed pursuant to a reinsurance participation agreement (RPA), a Nebraska federal magistrate judge on July 25 found that requests for workers’ compensation information and corporate structure “are relevant and proportional to the present needs of the case” (Applied Underwriters Inc. v. Top’s Personnel Inc., No. 15-90, D. Neb., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124338).

  • July 27, 2018

    Google Defends Document Withholding, Redaction In Biometric Privacy Suits

    CHICAGO — Opposing a motion to compel production of documents withheld under attorney-client privilege, Google LLC in a July 26 filing tells an Illinois federal court that the disputed materials were properly designated as privileged as they pertained to legal advice in two lawsuits alleging that it violated Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) with a photo-tagging feature (Lindabeth Rivera v. Google LLC, No. 1:16-cv-02714, and Joseph Weiss v. Google LLC, No. 1:16-cv-02870, N.D. Ill.).

  • July 27, 2018

    Toyota Denied Mandamus To Prevent Admission Of Privileged Documents At Trial

    DALLAS — A Texas appeals panel on July 24 denied a petition by Toyota Motor Corp., in which the automaker sought relief from what it called a trial court’s effective denial of its motion for a protective order to prevent use of purportedly attorney-client-privileged documents in a product liability trial over purported auto design defects that led to the injury of two children in an accident (In re Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc., et al., No. 05-18-00839-CV, Texas App., 5th Dist., 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 5658).

  • July 26, 2018

    Federal Magistrate Judge Says Compensation Paid To Reviewing Doctor Is Relevant

    NEW ORLEANS — A Louisiana federal magistrate judge on July 11 partially denied a disability insurer’s motion to quash a subpoena seeking compensation records from a physician hired by the insurer to review a disability claimant’s file after determining that the discovery sought is relevant and permitted under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (Anne Wittmann v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, No. 17-9501, E.D. La., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115848).