We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Mealey's Discovery

  • February 21, 2019

    Trade Group To High Court: ‘Confidential’ Store Data Exempt From FOIA Production

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a Feb. 15 merits brief, a trade association tells the U.S. Supreme Court that an exemption of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for “trade secrets and commercial or financial information” merely requires a showing that withheld information was “confidential,” arguing that an Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling improperly held that the exemption required establishing that “substantial competitive harm” would result from disclosure (Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, No. 18-481, U.S. Sup.).

  • February 20, 2019

    Judge Overrules Doctors’ Objections To Ruling Refusing To Quash Subpoenas

    LAS VEGAS — A federal judge in Nevada on Feb. 14 overruled objections by two doctors accused of submitting bills to Allstate Insurance Co. and its affiliates for medical services provided to victims of automobile accidents that were not provided or medically unnecessary to a magistrate judge’s ruling denying their motion to quash subpoenas seeking financial records, finding that the requested information is relevant and that the subpoenas cannot be narrowed (Allstate Insurance Co., et al. v. Marjorie Belsky, M.D., et al., No. 15-cv-2265, D. Nev., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24986).

  • February 20, 2019

    Movie Studios Seek Access To VidAngel’s Counsel’s Memo Over Copyright Defenses

    LOS ANGELES — Arguing that VidAngel Inc. waived any attorney-client privilege in a memorandum authored by its lawyer by referencing it as a source of its advice-of-counsel defense against willful copyright infringement, a group of plaintiff movie studios asked a California federal court on Feb. 14 to compel the online movie-filtering service to submit the memorandum and any other documents related to its defenses (Disney Enterprises Inc., et al. v. VidAngel Inc., No. 2:16-cv-04109, C.D. Calif.).

  • February 20, 2019

    Texas High Court Upholds Attorney-Client Privilege For Testifying Expert Materials

    AUSTIN, Texas — A Texas discovery rule requiring the production of a testifying expert’s materials does not apply to any that properly qualify as privileged, the Texas Supreme Court ruled Feb. 15, chiding a Texas city for “seek[ing] to broaden the scope of expert discovery to include material that is otherwise protected by the attorney-client privilege” in a Hurricane Ike insurance coverage dispute (In re Dickinson, No. 17-0020, Texas Sup., 2019 Tex. LEXIS 165).

  • February 15, 2019

    Supreme Court To Hear Case Over Census Question, Commerce Secretary Deposition

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a miscellaneous order issued Feb. 15, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) in a suit that addresses whether a trial court properly struck down a planned U.S. census question over citizenship, as well as whether the court had the authority to order the deposition of the secretary of Commerce to probe his mental processes on the decision to add the citizenship question (U.S. Department of Commerce, et al. v. New York, et al., No. 18-966, U.S. Sup.).

  • February 14, 2019

    Motion To Compel Denied In Securities Class Action

    HARRISBURG, Pa. — The lead plaintiff in a securities class action against a financial institution, its parent holding company and others has failed to show that it exhausted its administrative remedies before bringing a motion to compel the production of protected documents, a federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled Feb. 12 (Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Orrstown Financial Services Inc., et al., No. 12-0993, M.D. Pa., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22436).

  • February 12, 2019

    6th Circuit Affirms Coverage Denial, Discovery Ruling In Rain Damage Dispute

    CINCINNATI — A trial court correctly found that a building owner’s delay in informing its insurer of a rain storm damage claim voided its coverage, a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Feb. 8, also affirming a finding that documents withheld from discovery by the insurer were prepared in expectation of litigation and, therefore, privileged (South Fifth Towers LLC v. Aspen Insurance UK Ltd., et al., No. 18-5440, 6th Cir., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 3939).

  • February 12, 2019

    Judge Rules On Series Of Motions In Coverage Suit Over Superstorm Sandy Vandalism

    BROOKLYN, N.Y. — A New York federal magistrate on Feb. 6 recommended that an insurer’s motions for leave to amend its answer to include certain counterclaims, to compel and for sanctions be granted and that the insureds’ motion to file a second amended complaint be denied in a coverage dispute following Superstorm Sandy (Robert and Laura Toussie v. Allstate Insurance Company, No. 15-5235, E. D. N.Y., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20309).

  • February 12, 2019

    Insurance Agency, Agent Seek Documents By Trustees In Disparagement Case

    TULSA, Okla. — In a lawsuit over alleged disparagement to a self-insurance products distributor during the promotion of a competitor’s products to school districts, an insurance agency and agent in a Feb. 8 motion ask an Oklahoma federal court to compel the trustees of Oklahoma School Risk Management Trust (OSRMT) to produce certain documents (The Sandner Group – Alternative Risk Solutions Inc. v. BancFirst Insurance Services Inc., et al., No. 18-0265, N.D. Okla.).

  • February 12, 2019

    Jurisdictional Discovery Ordered In Lanham Suit Over Online Beauty Products Sales

    HOUSTON — Adopting a magistrate’s recommendation, a Texas federal judge on Feb. 7 denied an online retailer’s motion to dismiss a Lanham Act lawsuit over its alleged sale of counterfeit goods for lack of jurisdiction, finding that good cause exists to conduct limited discovery as to whether Texas jurisdiction is proper (Danny Huynh v. Zurno Inc., No. 4:18-cv-01756, S.D. Texas, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20360).

  • February 12, 2019

    Judge: Most Freedom Of Information Exceptions Apply To Nestle Forest Water Permit

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A District of Columbia federal judge on Feb. 4 ruled that the U.S. Forest Service was justified in invoking some Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exceptions but not others in an environmental group’s challenge of Nestle Waters North America Inc.’s license to take water from the San Bernardino National Forest (Story of Stuff Project v. United States Forest Service, No. 18-170, D. D.C., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17158).

  • February 11, 2019

    Insurer Denied Access To Plaintiffs’ Computers In Data Breach Suit

    PORTLAND, Ore. — Addressing motions to compel by both sides in a consolidated class action over a 2014 data breach experienced by Premera Blue Cross, an Oregon federal judge on Feb. 6 denied the health insurer’s request to inspect the computers and devices of the named plaintiffs, finding the request to be “not proportional to the needs of the case” and outweighed by the plaintiffs’ privacy interests (In Re:  Premera Blue Cross Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, No. 3:15-md-02633, D. Ore., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20279).

  • February 6, 2019

    Judge Denies Stay Of Order Enforcing Summonses In Reinsurer’s Fraud Case

    WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — A New York federal judge on Feb. 4 rejected a request to stay enforcement of an order requiring an investment group and its founder to produce documents under an arbitration panel’s summonses in a fraud case against a reinsurer and a hedge fund (Washington National Insurance Co. v. OBEX Group LLC, et al., No. 18-9693, S.D. N.Y.).

  • February 5, 2019

    Twitter, DOJ Debate FBI Document’s Classified Status In Gag Order Lawsuit

    OAKLAND, Calif. — The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on Feb. 1 filed a reply brief in response to a California federal court’s order to show cause, arguing that a Federal Bureau of Investigation declaration should remain classified and inaccessible to Twitter Inc. in a lawsuit focusing on the social network’s quest to inform the public about its compelled role in the FBI’s surveillance program (Twitter Inc. v. Matthew G. Whitaker, et al., No. 4:14-cv-04480, N.D. Calif.).

  • February 4, 2019

    Judge Stays Case Over Landfill’s Discharges, Allows Group To Take Samples

    TACOMA, Wash. — A federal judge in Washington on Jan. 31 stayed a lawsuit brought by an environmental group against the owners of a landfill over discharges of storm water that allegedly violate the Clean Water Act so the defendant companies could work with the Washington Department of Ecology to resolve uncertainties about the companies’ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits (Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Pierce County Recycling, Composting & Disposal LLC, et al., No. C17-5731 BHS, W.D. Wash., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15736).

  • February 4, 2019

    Discovery Plan, Scheduling Order Issued In Reinsurance Breach Of Contract Case

    NEW YORK — In a breach of contract lawsuit regarding claims under facultative reinsurance contracts for losses of $2.5 million, a New York federal judge on Jan. 31 issued a civil case discovery plan and scheduling order (Continental Insurance Company of New Jersey, et al. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, No. 18-4715, S.D. N.Y.).

  • February 4, 2019

    Judge Receives Letters On Production Of Documents In Fraud Case Against Reinsurer

    WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — Letters written to a New York federal judge on Jan. 31 address whether an investment group and its founder should be forced to produce documents under an arbitration panel’s summonses in a fraud case against a reinsurer and a hedge fund (Washington National Insurance Co. v. OBEX Group LLC, et al., No. 18-9693, S.D. N.Y.).

  • February 4, 2019

    Donziger: Chevron’s Discovery Request ‘Entirely Unjustified’

    NEW YORK — Steven R. Donziger, the attorney who won an $18.5 billion judgment against Chevron Corp. in a court in Ecuador for injuries only to have it reversed, on Jan. 29 filed a brief in New York federal court opposing Chevron’s motion for permission to seize, “image” and search all of his electronic devices and online accounts on grounds that it is “entirely unjustified” (Chevron Corporation v. Steven Donziger, No. 11-691, S.D. N.Y.).

  • January 30, 2019

    Judge Orders Clinics, Claims Facility To Refine Records Request, Objections

    FLINT, Mich. — A federal judge in Michigan on Jan. 29 denied in part a motion to compel filed by the Michigan Automobile Insurance Placement Facility (MAIPF) seeking records from a number of chiropractic clinics and employees accused of engaging in a scheme intended to fraudulently generate bills for unnecessary medical services provided to individuals submitted claims for no-fault personal injury protection benefits, ordering the facility to refine its records requests and the defendants to provide more details for their objections (Michigan Automobile Insurance Placement Facility v. New Grace Rehabilitation Center PLLC, et al., No. 17-11007, E.D. Mich., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13511).

  • January 29, 2019

    Judge Refuses To Reconsider Denial Of Discovery Request Related To Financials

    WILKESBORO, N.C. — A North Carolina judge on Jan. 25 refused to reconsider the denial of a franchisor’s motion to compel requests related to the financial impact of its alleged overpricing on franchisees’ businesses, finding that the decision contained no clear error or misapplied applicable law (Window World of Baton Rouge LLC, et al. v. Window World Inc., et al., Nos. 15 CVS 1, 15 CVS 2, N.C. Super., Wilkes Co., 2019 NCBC LEXIS 7).