Mealey's (May 4, 2018, 2:00 PM EDT) -- MILWAUKEE — A plaintiff’s “deluge” of nearly 2,000 pages of documents in support of a “second kick at the cat” raises no new evidence warranting reconsideration of a Daubert ruling, but rather seems to be an attempt to overwhelm the court with paper in hopes it simply gives in, a federal judge in Wisconsin held May 2 in excluding an asbestos expert (Beverly Ahnert, et al. v. Brand Insulation Inc., et al., Nos. 10-156, 13-1456, E.D. Wis.)....