OAKLAND, Calif. — In an Aug. 24 reply brief supporting its motion for a protective order, an Israeli spyware developer tells a California federal court that the protective order "is urgently needed" for the disclosure of "very important information . . . that bears directly on" a motion to compel filed by plaintiff WhatsApp Inc. in computer fraud lawsuit against the spyware firm (WhatsApp Inc., et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al., No. 4:19-cv-07123, N.D. Calif.).
CHICAGO — A warrant application by the government for a "geofence" to identify devices in the proximity of crimes being investigated did not meet the probable cause and particularity requirements of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, an Illinois federal magistrate judge found in a ruling that was unsealed Aug. 24, finding that the proposed warrant would give the government too much discretion to obtain the device and personal information of passersby unrelated to the crimes (In re Search of Information Stored at Premises Controlled by Google, No. 20-mc-392, N.D. Ill., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152712).
CHICAGO — An Illinois federal judge on Aug. 21 granted a motion by Clearview AI Inc. to stay two consolidated Illinois suits over the company's creation of a facial recognition database pending a decision by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPMDL) on Clearview's recently filed motion to transfer and consolidate the cases with a group of similar lawsuits in New York federal court (David Mutnick v. Clearview AI Inc., et al., No. 20-cv-512, N.D. Ill.).
CHICAGO — In an Aug. 21 proposed case management schedule, TikTok Inc. and the plaintiffs from most of a consolidated multidistrict litigation tell an Illinois federal court that their recently announced settlement in principle of privacy claims against the social media company should be finalized and ready for court approval in 60 days (In re TikTok Consumer Privacy Litigation, No. 20-4699, N.D. Ill.).
EAST ST. LOUIS, Ill. — A federal magistrate judge on Aug. 19 issued a split ruling on a remand motion by a former indoor trampoline park employee who alleges in a putative class complaint that her employer and the company that it uses for a fingerprint collection system violated two sections of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), finding that Article III of the U.S. Constitution standing was shown for claims under only one of the two sections (Madisyn Stauffer, et al. v. Innovative Heights Fairview Heights, LLC, et al., No. 20-46, S.D. Ill., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149460).
CHICAGO — Although an Illinois federal judge previously found that the Chicago Sun-Times was partly liable under the Driver's Privacy Protection Act (DPPA) for the online publication of certain personal information of five Chicago Police Department (CPD) officers, the judge on Aug. 14 found that the officers had not established that they were entitled to punitive or liquidated damages under the statute, denying their motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) (Scott Dahlstrom, et al. v. Sun-Times Media LLC, No. 1:12-cv-00658, N,D, Ill., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147498).
SAN FRANCISCO — After denying approval in June to the first draft of a proposed settlement in a class action over Facebook Inc.'s utilization of facial scans in a photo-tagging feature, a California federal judge on Aug. 19 granted preliminary approval to a revised agreement that resolved his earlier concerns, notably increasing the settlement fund from $550 million to $650 million (In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, No. 3:15-cv-03747, N.D. Calif.).
FRESNO, Calif. — A California meat processing facility failed to take the steps necessary to protect its employees from the novel coronavirus, hid the initial cases among employees, pressured those who were sick to continue working and later "recklessly disclosed" the private health information of hundreds of employees who were infected, one employee alleges in a class complaint filed July 22 in a federal court in the state (Maria Pilar Ornelas, et al. v. Central Valley Meat Co., Inc., No. 20-1017, E.D. Calif.).
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California on Aug. 17 granted a post-judgment motion filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission in an enforcement action against Facebook Inc., establishing a fair fund for $100 million in civil penalties the social media giant agreed to pay as part of a consent of final judgment stemming from Facebook's issuance of misrepresentations to investors concealing misuse of its user data by data analytics company Cambridge Analytica (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Facebook Inc., No. 19-4241, N.D. Calif.).
SAN FRANCISCO — A class member who objected to the $13 million settlement of a privacy class action over Google LLC's Street View feature took his fight to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in an Aug. 12 brief, arguing that the cy pres-only nature of the settlement ignores the interests of absent class members and runs counter to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (In re Google LLC Street View Electronic Communications Litigation [Benjamin Joffe, et al. v. Google Inc.], No. 20-15616, 9th Cir.).
TRENTON, N.J. — In a divided ruling, a New Jersey Supreme Court majority on Aug. 10 found that a warrant compelling an arrestee to produce the passcode to unlock a smartphone does not violate the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because it does not require a testimonial act that reveals the contents of an individual's mind (New Jersey v. Robert Andrews, No. A-72-18, N.J. Sup., 2020 N.J. LEXIS 898).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Aug. 11 dismissed the second appeal in a putative privacy class action over a 2014 data breach experienced by CareFirst Inc., concluding that the court lacked jurisdiction because not all of the lead plaintiffs' claims were dismissed by the trial court (Chantal Attias, et al. v. CareFirst Inc., et al., No. 19-7020, D.C. Cir., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25392).
KANSAS CITY, Kan. — A Kansas federal judge on July 27 declined to grant the government's request for a protective order to excuse it from completing purportedly burdensome discovery related to two prisoners' claims of attorney-client privacy violations due to eavesdropping, stating that "[t]he government hasn't persuaded the court of this 'impossibility'" of completing searches of electronically stored information (ESI) (In re: CCA Recordings 2255 Litigation, No. 2:19-cv-02491, D. Kan., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132254).
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a pair of executive orders issued Aug. 6, President Donald J. Trump essentially banned any use within the United States of the popular social networking TikTok and WeChat apps, citing threats to "the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States" from the mobile applications, both of which are owned by companies in the People's Republic of China.
NEW YORK — Responding to a motion by Clearview AI Inc. to extend time to answer several class complaints against it, a New York federal judge on Aug. 4 issued an order clarifying that the deadlines to respond are adjourned sine die in light of an upcoming conference that will address all six biometric privacy suits against Clearview pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Mario Calderon, et al. v. Clearview AI Inc., No. 1:20-cv-01296, S.D. N.Y.).
PITTSBURGH — A Pittsburgh hospital properly removed a putative privacy class action against it to federal court under the federal officer removal statute, a Pennsylvania federal judge found July 31, denying a motion to remand the lawsuit over the sharing of patient data to state court (Jane Doe I, et al. v. UPMC, No. 2:20-cv-00359, W.D. Pa., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136077).
LOS ANGELES — VIZIO Inc. on July 30 sued its insurers in a California federal court, seeking defense and indemnity for an underlying $17 million settlement and defense costs arising from class claims over the insured's unauthorized collections of consumers' television viewing data (VIZIO Inc. v. Navigators Insurance Company, et al., No. 20-6864, C.D. Calif.).
SAN JOSE, Calif. — In a consolidated class complaint filed July 30 in California federal court, a group of users of Zoom Video Communications Inc.'s videoconferencing products accuse the company of "an egregious invasion of their privacy" via the collection and sharing of their personal data with third parties and for failing to protect their video conferences from interception and intrusion by "bad actors" (In re: Zoom Video Communications Inc. Privacy Litigation, No. 5:20-cv-02155, N.D. Calif.).
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — The company hired by Arkansas to create and maintain the unemployment website for self-employed and gig workers seeking benefits during the novel coronavirus pandemic failed to prevent a data breach, resulting in frozen accounts for those seeking the aid and exposure to identity theft, three individuals allege in their putative class complaint and emergency motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) filed July 14 in an Arkansas court (Samuel Acker, et al. v. Protech Solutions, Inc., No. 60CV-20-3858, Ark. Cir., Pulaski Co.).
SAN FRANCISCO — After a California federal judge denied preliminary approval to a proposed $550 million settlement of a class action over Facebook Inc.'s collection of biometric identifiers in its photo "Tag Suggestions" feature, the social network on July 22 filed a notice of amended stipulation of the agreement that increased the settlement fund to $650 million (In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, No. 3:15-cv-03747, N.D. Calif.).