Hearst Found To Have No Duty To Preserve Evidence Between Cases

Mealey's (December 19, 2017, 2:10 PM EST) -- NEW YORK — A magazine publisher that has faced several class complaints alleging unlawful disclosures of customers’ data had no duty to preserve evidence between the termination of the first class complaint and the filing of the second, a New York federal magistrate judge ruled Dec. 18 (Josephine James Edwards v. Hearst Communications, Inc., No. 15-9279, S.D. N.Y., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207540)....