Judge: Policy Exclusions Bar Coverage In Hotel Construction Contract Suit

Mealey's (February 23, 2022, 2:36 PM EST) -- SEATTLE — Exclusions in a contractor’s primary commercial general liability policy bar coverage for losses related to hotel construction delays and alleged water intrusion damages, and an umbrella policy does not apply, a Washington federal judge held Feb. 4, denying a project owner’s continuance motion and granting summary judgment to insurers....

Attached Documents

Order
WSHH’s answer to complaint and counterclaim
Valley Forge’s and Continental’s answer to counterclaim
Valley Forge’s and Continental’s motion for summary judgment with attachments
Todaro’s declaration in support of motion for summary judgment with attachments
Bradix’s declaration in support of motion for summary judgment with attachments
WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion and Rule 56(d) motion
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 1
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 2
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 3
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 4
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 5
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 6
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 7
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 8
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 9
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 10
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 11
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 12
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 13
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 14
Clapham Laveson’s declaration in support of WSHH’s response to summary judgment motion with attachments, part 15
Valley Forge’s and Continental’s reply in support of summary judgment
Complaint with attachments

Related Sections

Mealey's Construction Defects Insurance