Judge: Insurer’s Argument As To Which Statement Of Values Applies Is ‘Disingenuous’

Mealey's (February 7, 2020, 10:07 AM EST) -- MIAMI — A federal judge in Florida on Feb. 5 granted an insured’s renewed motion for summary judgment on the issue of which statement of values applies in a Hurricane Irma coverage dispute, finding that the insurer’s argument that “it actually meant something else or that it could be referring to another document is disingenuous” (Aligned Bayshore Holdings v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, No. 18-21692, S.D. Fla., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18754)....